Post-PC devices: Samsung's got the sales, but Apple's making the money
Summary: The latest figures for 'smart connected devices' show that while Samsung's still selling more units than its rival (just about), Apple's far and away the leader on margins.
When it comes to 'smart connected devices' — think PCs, tablets and smartphones — Apple's iPhone 5 and iPad mini have put it within a whisker of leader Samsung.
Samsung accounted for 21.2 percent of the 378 million devices shipped in the last quarter of 2012, placing it just ahead of Apple's 20.3 percent, according to analyst firm IDC. Apple has gained five percentage points since the previous quarter, compared with Samsung's one percent rise. Samsung overtook Apple as market leader by shipments last year, due largely to the South Korean company's increasing smartphone sales, IDC said.
IDC estimates there were 1.2 billion smart connected devices shipped last year. The multi-form factor category was worth $168bn for the fourth quarter, which Apple dominated with 30.7 percent of revenue, while Samsung accounted for 20.4 percent.
Tablet forecasts
IDC expects last year's tablet shipments of 128 million to grow 48.7 to 190 million units by the end of 2013, by which time they will overtake desktop shipments, which reached 148 million in 2012. Desktop shipments are expected to decline 4.3 percent this year.
It does not expect tablets to surpass last year's portable PC shipments of 202 million until 2014, in line with the timeframe fellow analyst firm Canalys has predicted. Portable PCs shipments will be practically flat at 0.9 percent growth, said IDC.
IDC's timeframe for tablets to surpass PC shipments flesh out a forecast in February by analyst Sameer Singh, who predicted tablets could overtake PC shipments as early as Q4 2013.
The fastest growth is expected to come from emerging markets, where IDC notes tablets grew 111 percent in 2012, compared with 62 percent in mature markets.
Smartphone shipments also grew faster in emerging markets at 39 percent compared with 20 percent in mature markets.
"In emerging markets, consumer spending typically starts with mobile phones and, in many cases, moves to tablets before PCs," said Megha Saini, research analyst for IDC's Worldwide Smart Connected Device Tracker.
"The pressure on the PC market is significantly increasing and we can see longer replacement cycles coming into effect very soon and that, too, will put downward pressure on PC sales."
IDC also gave its four year outlook, predicting tablet sales to reach over 350 million and portable PCs to hit 240 million.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback
How does Apple's excessive profit benefit consumers?
Er......
Good lord!
Sorry, no one can control the supply chain like Apple can. You folks keep worrying about market share while Apple worries about making money.
Actually
Couldn't actually care who makes more money, it's the media applause that is just grating.
The morons who pay loads of cash to Apple then celebrate them and praise them for their revenues, well that sort of things been happening for years. Better than handing over your first born anyway.....
How do you not get it?
So what you are saying is...
So you are actually saying ...
I've got a used VW I'll sell you for only $100K. Call me. You can then brag about how clever you are.
Sell a few hundred thousand of those used VWs,
Considering a company has to persuade people
What you really mean to say is that Apple makes more profit than you think they should. Which is a totally meaningless statement. Since you are not a participant in buying or selling Apple products, your opinions on their price and profit is irrelevant.
Warning sign
So you see no value in quality?
so
Ok..........
Quality is good, paying over the odds for less is not.
Re: So you see no value in quality?
I have tenuous logic.??????
For your own and the public's safety.
Bernard Madoff persuaded lots of people
What Benefits the Fish When Cows Go Hungry
2) Apple, too, is a consumer.
3) In accordance with free market theory, a transaction occurs when an item of value is exchanged for a desired good or service. If Apple is selling things, we presume that people (consumers as you call them) wanted the item at those conditions and that's the benefit, not the seller's specific price point (which is more controlled by supply and demand then the seller's desire to make precise margins.)
4) Everyone wants to increase their margin if they can. Some folks lower margin in order to gain volume. High volume / high margin is everyone's Plan A.
5) AnalogJoystick begs the question that Samsung is carefully choosing its profitability so as to strike the non-existent theoretical max-benefit-to-consumers-point. I think Samsung is spending like crazy on marketing with two goals in mind, to sell the devices that Apple won't and to crush the competition underneath. At this point, win and win. Meanwhile — and how this drives some of us crazy — as Samsung has been winning, Apple has not been losing. Indeed as Samsung is a parts supplier to Apple, it also profits from Apple's profit.
6) Not everyone buys smartphones and tablets. In fact, at IDC's estimated tablet shipment rate of 200 million, it will take 35 years to sell one to everyone in the world today. If everyone shipped is bought. Hmm. In 35 years, there will be more people. If one has no need for a smartphone, tablet, or computing device — and I'm not sure that demand will be universal or the services usable were it so — it doesn't really matter what the prices are or how much profit any one is making.
7) If you don't like what Apple sells for the price it sells it as, don't buy it. The rest of us make decision like that every day; we just don't overlay a self-serving patina of "theoretic greater good." Now, if Apple and Samsung put money into the bank because they have devices people want, that's fine. I would not want any one judging me as bad for the consumer if the fruits of my honest labor end up with my having more money in the bank. I don't think AnalogJoystick is arguing that if a worker is cash positive, he or she is being overpaid, meaning a consumer somewhere is being charged too much. Though, looking at it, perhaps AnalogyJoystick is making that exact argument. Though AJ's employers and/or clients might be more interested in that self-negation than us here reading ZDNet.
That's just plain crazy!
A company that makes much less profit compared to its competitor is a "winner"???
Welcome to Bizzaro World! ;-)
Since you struggle with reading comprehension
Dumb!
Well
Bearing in mind we only talk about Samsung Electronics here, not the whole conglomerate here.
Not gonna happen, while we're still alive anyway.