Samsung Galaxy S3 'vulnerable' to remote malicious reset
Summary: A single line of code embedded in a web page can be used to trigger a remote factory reset of some Samsung smartphones, including the Galaxy SIII and SII, a researcher has claimed.
Owners of Samsung Galaxy SII and SIII smartphones may want to take care when opening web links received via QR, NFC or push messages, after a security researcher showed that the handsets are potentially vulnerable to being remotely wiped.
Ravi Borgaonkar, a researcher in the Security in Communications department at Technical University Berlin, demonstrated the weakness at the Ekoparty security conference in Argentina last week.
According to Borgaonkar, the way the Galaxy SIII uses Unstructured Supplementary Service Data leaves it wide open to exploitation via a single line of malicious code embedded in a web page. Unstructured Supplementary Service Data, or USSD, is used to send messages between a phone and an application server.
The code can be used to trigger the reset for a Galaxy SIII, according to Twitter user @pof. Embedding it in a simple frame will automatically trigger a non-user initiated factory reset of the device, he added.
However, simply browsing a website with the code embedded will not trigger the reset, but opening a message via QR, NFC or WAP Push SMS will. When the website link opens, it starts the wipe.
In the demonstration video above, taken during the Ekoparty security conference, Borgaonkar said that the vulnerability can be mitigated by switching off Samsung's 'Service Loading' feature.
Samsung had not responded to a request for comment at the time of writing.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
Real Effects?
Real question is, what else can this exploit do? If it's nothing else then meh, no big deal, if there's more to come from hackers using this exploit, well then I'll just have to listen to the last 5yrs of people telling me not to open links I didn't ask for........
It's funny
Wrong again, thanks for turning up though
Please spare me the lies.
And I admit I have a bias against the apple reality distortion field
I don't hate apple owners, I sit within 5m of 3 for 8 hours a day and have just suggested an ipad to a relative as it's the right 'fit' for them, while paying apple the royalty fees by buying peripherals for their birthday.
What I do hate is FUD and BS, no matter what the topic, and that's what I find fun to pick on. It's not some ethical crusade, it's just fun. Why? Because your average itard will defend the fruit name regardless of facts. I especially hate the distortion of history into what can only be called 'history - sponsored by apple'. That's good marketing, credit to apple, it's blind acceptance by the itards that I take issue with. If people didn't believe the FUD and BS, I'd have no problem.
Personally I find it amusing that anyone can have such an attachment to a faceless corporation that cares for nothing but the £ you spend with them. A small package of electronic hardware? Big deal, I don't have an emotional relationship with my calculator nor my SGS3. If Nokia bring out an 8 phone that beats everything else out of the water, I'll jump ship (excuse the obvious mixed met's), without hesitation, how many itards can say the same?
But then I've already explained this to you and the other itrolls, who refuse to listen. Why - because I call BS on the lies and spin that itards think passes as coherent argument.
Ultimately, you and the rest of the sunshine bus trip claim fandroids jump on anything to cause an argument, yet here we are, totally off topic thanks to you and the window licker from the front of the bus.
I only see 2 people
Nasty?
Name calling?
Who tends to skew the facts?
Truth? There are now three different ways for a single line of code to flat wipe a Galaxy clean. A simple user mistake of scanning a QR code, viewing an SMS message or, horror of horrors, activating his so-vaunted Near Field Communications ability at the wrong time could turn that Galaxy into a brick--unrecoverable until it can be re-activated.
Boring
I find it amusing that you refer to me as an iTard
So it's pot and kettle again then?
Draw?
But let me guess - you didn't find a post where I defend Apple when they were in the wrong.
Let me break it down for you - my iPhone is a tool nothing more. If I find a tool that works better for me then I'll use it. Thus far the only device thats come close is my HTC TBolt. And the iPhone is the only Apple product I use... I'm writing this on my Dell Inspiron laptop, my desktop is a Dell XPS, and I use a B&N Nook that is rooted.
It's not that I am a blind Apple iFanatic but I will counter the FUD and lies the fAndroids throw like a monkey flings poo just as I will counter those iFanatics who do the same...
Have YOU ever tried an iOS product? Just curious.
Unfortunately I agree
And yes, we have istuff in our household, so what? I've never said it's bad kit and I stand by that. You're very selective on which comments you base your opinion of me on, even though I do try and keep the words small so you and the rest of the iDWF's can understand.
And there you go again...
Are you even capable of having a discussion witout insults?
ToddyBum, you've made yourself another screen name!
I'm on it if its Android or I-phone
What do you mean its time for a Windows phone 8?
But why do people always have to put others down, just because they choose to use or like a different platform, or using multiple platforms?
Nobody should be calling others fandroids, itards, wintards, etc...esp. in 2012.....
TW
Real Effects!
Oh, yes. If the Maps thing is a big issue for the iPhone 5, then this is a HUGE issue for Samsung's Galaxy series.
According to reports