Security startups are booming so why is enterprise security getting worse?

Security startups are booming so why is enterprise security getting worse?

Summary: The complexity is becoming overwhelming as exploits become ever more sophisticated.

SHARE:
Eastwick dinner-10

 

I attended a dinner organized by Eastwick Communications that featured several of their security clients and a security industry analyst. The discussion grew ever more interesting as the wine glasses emptied and refilled. Here’s my notes from the evening:

- List of participants is below. Each of the security companies is working in important areas and focused on helping enterprises deal with the many risks.

- One of the companies said that security used to be difficult for startups to get funding but these days, it’s a very good sector and VCs love security companies. There’s also lots of revenue potential because of the complexity of enterprise security.

- The complexity of the security risks facing companies was repeated time and again by each of the companies.

- Deborah Gage from the Wall Street Journal asked a good question: Can private industry deal with the security issues or does it need government involvement? She didn’t receive a good answer beyond the usual response that government involvement isn’t necessary .

- We were reminded of the “fiduciary duties” that executives have towards making sure their business is protected from security risks.

- I asked what exactly are those fiduciary duties when it comes to security risks? How much is enough security? Is there a standard set?

- Private Core has an interesting approach to it’s goal of making cloud IT services as secure as your own data center. It encrypts the entire computation of an app from within the cache memory of microprocessors. It’s a much smaller attack surface. 

- NSA revelations haven’t caused much concern among US enterprises but in Europe it is having a very large effect on enterprises. 

- Enterprises often don’t know what devices they have connected to their networks. There are typically 5,ooo applications used by staff in a large organization.

- Apps such as Dropbox are a problem because they have APIs and their contents are shareable by many other applications, greatly magnifying risks.

- “Free” apps on phones and tablets are a worry because they are making money by sharing data on their enterprise users — it’s one of the problems with the bring-your-own-device trend.

- Security is a very good business because it is one of the few things that will get a CEO out of bed at night. 

 Jon Oltsik, senior analyst at the Enterprise Strategy Group, said security risks have increased because of the use of mobile, the increase in malware, and the problem that no one talks about: a big shortage of people with cyber security skills.

- I mentioned that people were still the biggest security risk and that people such as Edward Snowden were motivated by ethics and not money. It’s difficult to guard against ethical hackers  — at least with money theft there’s a silver trail to follow. And I’m surprised we’ve only had one Edward Snowden.

- There was some discussion that Millennials might be a security threat because they are upset with large college debts and poor salaries. I disagree, they are much more likely to be motivated by ethics — doing the right thing — than by money.

- Security analyst Jan Oltsik ended the evening with a bang. (Despite all the security companies at the table, and the many more in the industry), he said that the enterprise security situation is bad and will worsen further unless there is a radical new approach/technology developed. But what is that radical new technology? No one had an answer. 

Foremski’s Take: The security industry is constantly warning of ever greater risks to enterprises — the sky is always falling. When has a business bought enough security?

The answer seems to be that there is never enough security that you can buy. You can never have enough security is great for vendors but it’s very bad for enterprises because it leads to indecision. 

The complexity of the security risks is another issue. Some of the exploits are extremely sophisticated and can only be understood by experts in their fields. To expect CIO’s to be able to asses the risks of exotic malware and other new exploits, and then take appropriate steps is not realistic. It’s overwhelming.

The complexity needs to be outsourced in some way, even though the legal liabilities can’t be outsourced easily. Enterprises need specialist service providers that stay up to date on threats and can quickly implement protective measures and policies. Otherwise, the security situation will get worse.

Also, I wonder about the competitions that companies are advertising to find bugs and flaws in their software. Only a few people are rewarded but many others become familiar with the software and better able to discover and exploit additional weaknesses. Are the bug competitions training grounds for a new generation of hackers?

What was clear from the evening’s discussion is that security is a shimmering mirage that can never be reached, and can never quench your thirst for more. It’s a very good business to be in. Between the money lost to criminals and the money spent to prevent that loss, it’s a costly tax on doing business. And it does absolutely nothing to enable commerce or improve productivity. 

- - -

Participants:

Lasse Andresen, CEO, ForgeRock
ForgeRock is the only unified open source identity stack to protect enterprise, cloud, social and mobile applications at Internet scale.

Patrick Peterson, CEO, Agari
Agari provides global brands with the experience, tools, and analytics they need to eliminate email threats, protect customers and their personal data, and proactively guard brand reputation.

Arvind Purushotham, Citi Ventures
Citi Ventures is Citi's global corporate venturing arm, chartered to collaborate with internal and external partners to conceive, partner, launch, and scale new ventures that have the potential to disrupt and transform the financial services industry, drive client success, and generate new value for Citi.

Peter Long, CEO, Lockbox
Lockbox is an end-to-end, client-side encryption platform that allows users to generate and maintain encryption keys for secure and private file sharing and storage in the cloud.

Paul Stich, CEO, Appthority
Appthority provides the industry’s first all-in-one App Risk Management service that employs static, dynamic and behavioral analysis to immediately discover the hidden actions of apps and empower organizations to apply custom policies to prevent unwanted app behaviors.

Rob Rachwald, Senior Director, FireEye
FireEye is the leader in next generation threat protection, stopping advanced malware, zero-day, and targeted APT attacks that bypass traditional defenses.

Steve Weis, CTO, Private Core
Private Core is a venture-backed company delivering an industry first: the ability to protect enterprise data in use by encrypting memory.

Scott Gordon, CMO, ForeScout
ForeScout delivers pervasive network security by allowing organizations to continuously monitor and mitigate security exposures and cyber attacks.

Topics: Security, Enterprise Software

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

2 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • followers & control freaks

    The main problem is the security industry is made up of mostly followers and control freaks on a power trip. They believe they know everything you shouldn't do and generally have no solutions for how to do what needs to get done in order for business to be conducted in a timely manner. They are obsessed with stopping business from moving forward to solidify their power by playing the security card rather than providing solutions they throw up roadblocks.

    They move as a pack from one idea to the next without thinking following the prescribed mantra du jour while constantly being outflanked by gorilla tactics.

    The current spate of identity verification by profile question & answer will only lead to the leakage of massive amounts of personal data guaranteeing successful identity theft that will be unstoppable ultimately resulting in individuals being issued completely new identities. This will be viewed historically as a legitimate epic failure.
    greywolf7
  • Complexity always loses out at the end

    The more complex a system is, the more inherently fragile and vulnerable it is. Despite Microsoft's recent weaselly efforts to claim otherwise -- it only used data gathered from its weak and misnamed Malicious Software Removal Tool for that claim -- Windows 7 actually passed XP in overall vulnerability during the past year according to the somewhat more comprehensive NIST's National Vulnerability Database, and Windows 8 seems to be on even a faster track. But what about all those extra security features Microsoft incorporated into Windows 7 relative to XP? They simply were not enough to compensate for the issues 7's much greater complexity and bulk created.

    And this applies as well to these complex layers of security that companies and agencies have been resorting to. Their complexity sucks up time and effort for management, troubleshooting is a pain and lends itself to mistakes, and the slightest mistake, from a seemingly minor misconfiguration to not promptly enough getting critical patches applied, can easily turn into a very nasty "Whoops!" moment. The base software itself needs to be much better coded and robust, reducing the need for the cyber equivalent of moats, drawbridges, and trained dogs.
    JustCallMeBC