So, where's Apple's tablet computer?
Summary: If a TV isn't Apple's next big thing, then what about an OS X-powered tablet computer? Given the changes we've seen in OS X lately, it makes sense.
There's no doubt that Apple's iOS-powered iPad has been a massive hit, but with Microsoft and its hardware partners getting ready to unleash a multitude of Windows 8 and Windows RT powered hardware, can an OS X powered Apple tablet computer be far behind?
There's been endless speculation as to what Apple's next big thing will be. While many analysts, along with a huge number of tech pundits, believe that this is going to be an Apple branded television, I have to say that I'm skeptical. The television market is on its knees and unless Steve Jobs really did come up with the secret sauce to allow Apple to sell televisions by the millions, it doesn't seem like a good market for the consumer electronics giant to enter into.
So, if not a TV, what else?
How about an OS X powered tablet computer?
On the face of it, this might seem like a crazy idea. After all, the iPad is a highly successful tablet and given the tight grip that the Cupertino giant has on the tablet market, the company can ride the iPad for the foreseeable future. So far, the iPad's only real competition has been a flood of mediocre Android tablets. With Microsoft -- and countless hardware OEMs -- now stepping up to the plate, the iPad is going to face new, and possibly quite vigorous, pressure. Also, for the first time, Windows 8 will offer consumers the opportunity to experience a full-blown, touch-optimized operating system designed with tablets in mind.
Like it or not, Windows 8 is going to be a game changer. It's going to give people -- consumers and enterprise users alike -- a taste for tablets that feature a full-blown operating system. Is Apple going to let Microsoft and its OEMs define the full-OS tablet market?
This leaves Apple with a dilemma. Stick with the iPad and its cut-down iOS operating system, or offer a tablet with a more fully-featured operating system.
Joining the dots, I think that there's evidence to suggest that Apple is already preparing the way to put OS X on a tablet.
Starting with OS X 10.7 'Lion' Apple has been busy adding features from iOS into its desktop operating system. There have been small tweaks such as 'reverse scrolling,' which took the scrolling paradigm that mouse and touchpad users have become accustomed to and turned it on its head; and moving the content in the direction of finger movement, something that will be familiar to millions of iPad and iPhone users.
Then there's the Mac App Store, a mechanism of distributing apps to Mac users, bypassing the middleman and creating a digital distribution mechanism similar to the App Store present in iOS. Not only does this give Apple 30 percent of all software bought via the store, it gives users one-click access to the software they want. It also paves the way for iOS-like apps on OS X that would give users access to apps specifically designed for use with fingers rather that a keyboard, mouse, and touchpad.
Then there's iCloud. Local storage is now being augmented with cloud storage, and while none of the players -- Microsoft, Apple, or Google -- have nailed it down perfectly yet, the distinction between local storage and cloud storage is blurrier than ever.
There are countless other features from iOS that have made it into OS X, such as the Launchpad application launcher that allows users to fire off a program by single-clicking on an icon, a feature that looks a lot like the iOS SpringBoard or Home Screen interface. Launchpad makes a lot more sense on a touch device than it does on a system driven by a keyboard, mouse, and touchpad.
All this development work sounds like a perfect match for a tablet.
Microsoft has faced heavy criticism for making too many touch-related changes in Windows 8 too quickly. Apple, on the other hand, seems to have been making smaller, incremental changes in OS X. While some have rebelled against this iOSification of OS X, most users seem to be happy with the changes.
Apple, it seems, has been laying the groundwork for touch-enabled OS X systems for a few years, and now that Microsoft is preparing to make an assault on the tablet market, the time may be right for Apple to unveil its next-generation Mac -- the Mac Pad.
This certainly excites me more than all this talk of an Apple TV does.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
Naaaahhh...
Exactly.
In the future, all laptops will have a dockable configuration. It will meld the tablet market with the laptop market. It's a great new market that is flexible and user friendly.
Nope
The keyboard exist because it is user friendly to type longer text with it.
Bonus sides are:
+ Bigger battery (+9-16h)
+ Connectivity (2 USB, SD-card slot, Headphones+Mic)
+ Protects screen when in backpack
But the tablet needs to be accessible without any keyboard and laptop needs to be accessible without touching the display.
The GUI needs to be designed radically for both different work situations. Example Android in Transformer is awesome, but keyboard is only great when typing a lot emails, documents or otherwise writing a lot (and I mean dozens of pages per day).
The touchpad is still better to scroll views and point things as hands are comfortable on keyboard and it is easy just to click wanted (even better are those acceleration shortcuts in browser addons).
Touch screens are stupid. Here. Try this experiment.
Edit: Touch screens for desktop and laptops.
That example is so funny
Type out an 800 page novel using just the on screen keyboard while standing and holding the iPad in 1 hand. That was fun, wasn't it? Not.
Hint: holding your arm straight out in front of your body and holding it there for 60 seconds isn't the typical use case for a touch screen on a desktop or a laptop. In fact, there is NO different between using a touch screen on a laptop and using the iPad with a keyboard dock. From PERSONAL experience (since I own an iPad with a keyboard dock) the iPad is worse because you have NO CHOICE but to use the touch screen. At least a touch screen laptop gives you the option of using a mouse for all those times when on an iPad, you'd be forced to hold your arm straight out in front of your body for a minute.
Edit - agreed on needing edit back
or trackpad, like the Surface.
Go Toddy
toddbottom3 doesn't understand the concept.
Because I do a lot of traveling and I need to keep my blogs updated, and I have a lot of business correspondence, I find the iPad much more convenient than lightning around my MacBook Pro. I use Apples Pages it's fully customize for the tablet experience. Never have I had any major concerns typing out long reports, the iPad is fantastic.
Lately I have upgraded to an iPad 3 I have now switched over to do a lot of my work using the built-in dictation system. I find this much easier as long as you're in a quiet location otherwise I have to switch over to the keypad.
Apple's dictation system is fantastic I'm actually using it right now on my iPad using Mountain Lion. Every new Mac has built-in dictation which of just a few months ago would've cost you $200 to incorporate. There's no need to train it matter fact I've actually had a conversation sharing a microphone with two people that's picked up both sides of the conversation about any problems.
Even though the iPad can perform well doing correspondents on the road I really do believe that the iPad main function is to review and gather information. As a resource and search tool it's absolutely wonderful. My next purchase of course will be an iPad mini
SO I QUOTE TODDBOTTOM3 " TOUCH SCREENS ON PORTABLE DEVICES LIKE THE IPADS ARE STUPID.
I hope you reconsider your comments. Are you sure if you understand the concept of using a touchscreen. I know some people have a hard time adjusting to new technology.
Voice dictation and touch-screens on Apple devices will be the future. Soon the keyboard will take its place alongside obsolete devices. Roller balls in Mouse. CRT Computer screens. 5.25" floppy disk's. I think you get the idea by now.
Hope you find this information helpful and informative toddbottom3, keep working at it I hope you get the hang of it soon.
Uuummmm
Now a desktop screen would be a slightly different story. I'm really eager to try out Win 8 on a desktop with a pair of touchscreen monitors, just to see how much touch input I use. I suspect that it will be less than with the Transformer, but not entirely absent. But still, on a laptop? Yeah, a touch screen will make for a better experience, and I assure you, many people will take advantage of it.
Now if you'll excuse me, I'm about to reach out with my finger an hit "submit" on this comment.
I don't see this happening
They don't seem like they're gunning for one OS.
Didn't they even say it was a bad idea?
Nope
IOS, OS X and all their iPod etc devices use XNU operating system. The difference is that they include different system programs and libraries and software platforms to different devices/systems.
Now Microsoft has moved to same style in Windows Phone 8, as they have same NT operating system for all devices, from servers to smartphones and desktops.
"Like it or not, Windows 8 is going to be a game changer."
If Apple were to release an OS X tablet, that would be egg on Tim Cook's face.
Let me be the first to say it
And..
That would be nice
You don't have any money to bet
Why oh why
Because technology changes?
If we take you guys at your word, that the iPhone was simply a 2007 version of the failed NEWTON, clearly a good idea that was before its time can be reintroduced once technology can fully implement that idea.
Will Windows 8 tablets fail? Perhaps. Or maybe what killed those tablets were price, bulk, battery life, and a UI not designed for touch. Maybe if technology can now produce a 1.5lb, thin tablet with an 8 hour battery life with great support for touch apps while still giving you access to a desktop with great support for keyboards and mice / trackpads / stylus, the old idea of a tablet PC can be implement in 2013 to great success, just like the epic failure of an old idea (NEWTON) was finally implemented properly in 2007. Right?
Or is only Apple allowed to beat a dead horse? See Apple TV. Oops, that wasn't a dead horse, that was a hobby. It is all in the marketing.
Toddy... Another false equivalency..when will you stop?
http://www.engadget.com/2012/07/24/apple-q3-2012-hardware-sales-numbers/
So....not really equivalent after all, are they Toddy? Does that mean that you're the one doing the marketing or is it that your statements are not always (ever?) supported by the facts.
Please note: I'm not saying that Surface will fail....perhaps now that iPad has pointed MS in the right direction, the addition of a key board or docking station will make the difference. I'm simply pointing out that your constant use of the tools of the professional political operative (false equivalencies, sophistry, etc.) is ever increasingly tiresome.