The problem with the iPad
Summary: The lack of an accessible file system makes it hard to keep track of projects that use multiple files. Does Apple need to make the iOS file system accessible to all, or is there an easier way for the Cupertino giant to allow users to manage files?
The iPad was one of those pieces of tech that people really didn't expect to succeed. Prior to Apple's entry into the market, Microsoft had tried — and essentially failed — to take the form factor into the mainstream, but the Cupertino, California, giant's vision of what a tablet device should be was an overnight success.

As the iPad matured, it transitioned from being a consumer electronics bauble into also being a serious tool used by enterprise, with Apple claiming that virtually all of the Fortune 500 and over 85 percent of the Global 500 companies currently deploying or testing iPads.
The iPad's ace up its sleeve was simplicity. Everything about the device was built around making it as easy to use as possible. But it's possible to take simplicity too far, especially when enterprise users are concerned, and there's one aspect of the iPad that Apple may need to address to keep enterprise users happy, and that's file system access.
Jean-Louis Gassée of The Guardian succinctly summed up the problem facing the iPad.
"On a 'real' PC," wrote Gassée, "the file system is visible, accessible; on the iPad, it's hidden. The act of creating, arranging, accessing files on a PC is trivial and natural. We know how to use Finder on the Mac and Explorer on Windows."
But things are different on the iPad.
See also Network and network troubleshooting apps for the iPhone and iPad
"On an iPad, you don't navigate a file system, but, instead, you launch an app that has its own trove of documents that it understands — but it can't 'see' anything else," Gassée pointed out.
The more you work on an iPad, the more you notice this.
If everything you do is done in a single word processing document or spreadsheet, or you spend most of your time flinging birds and pigs, then you might never notice a problem, but if you work on projects that rely on multiple files or multimedia — and by this I mean multimedia in the loosest sense possible, in that you need multiple types of media — then this is when things start to get tricky. Even doing something as simple as keeping together a set of images that go with a word processor document is hard. Most of the time, you end up resorting to using a cloud storage service, a situation that can be far from ideal for some.
While there's little doubt that simplicity is at the heart of Apple's decision to hide the iOS file system from view, security and data integrity also plays a part. Apps are sandboxed from each other, and cannot, in most cases, see or tamper with data that belongs to another app.
Apple's intentions are honorable.
One way that Apple could solve this file system dilemma is to create shared storage space on iOS devices that any app — with the right permission — can access. This would work much like how photo storage works, where apps can ask for permission to access the camera roll, and then have the ability to access, modify, and save files. This would allow those who wanted to manage projects from their iPads — or, for that matter, their iPhones — the ability to create folders to hold a variety of project files, and then give apps the ability to access these folders.
This would offer the best of both worlds. It would allow Apple to keep the iOS file system from view, while offering enterprise and power users the ability to do more with their iPads.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
Get a Surface Pro
Even better yet
Gorilla Arm? Not necessarily...
Or..
No gorilla arm and not many alternatives for Surfaace Pro
THE REAL PROBLEM WITH IPAD
FFS, for $600, I want to see the LOGO in the dark!
"One of the" problems with iPad is...
You want customer access to files? Let iOS put a mount point on the SD card, call it "Home"
Try accessing the Cloud when you are on a plane. Or a passenger in a car. Internet is nice, but it isn't everywhere (contrary to some peoples opinion)
A 'File system' is old thinking
It really strikes me how hard we try to cling on to old modes of working, this is what the Surface Pro is hoping it will make money from
Just better to let go and get on with with living in the future
File managment
sure but
If the people around here only knew...
For most, email from the cloud is the largest part of the cloud they use. And of course this makes some good sense as cloud based email has been around forever, and its no small wonder given email really needs an internet connection anyway.
We cling onto things that work.
Its actually really important.
Pssst...
A file system! Sure, it's "on the cloud" but the basic idea of the file system is there.
It is, however, limited by the fact that you need to have access to it. You need to have access to the Internet and while this may be a trivial problem to a lot of people, it surely isn't so for everybody. A file system on the device itself would solve this problem.
all well and good
Document Manager?
Precisely.
real world uses files
iTunes
Mail
Apple has, with photo attachments, shown it is possible to cross-access files and so they could, if they felt so inclined, allow us to access other files thru, say, a Pages install or - if really paranoid, via Cloud services like their own.