Time for stricter harassment laws?

Time for stricter harassment laws?

Summary: A remarkable scolding incident filmed on a handphone has appeared on Web sites. In it, a lady is seen launching a verbal barrage at a commuter standing in a commuter train.

SHARE:

A remarkable scolding incident filmed on a handphone has appeared on Web sites. In it, a lady is seen launching a verbal barrage at a commuter standing in a commuter train. The five minute edited video seems to suggest a much longer period of filming in which the lady loudly proclaims in a mixture of Hokkien, Mandarin and English apparently stemming from an incident where some physical contact may have taken place in a crowded train.

Some pronouncement of the law is also spewed out by this lady (however, this should not be taken as legal advice--she ignored the long-accepted principle that some form of physical contact in crowded place as a defence to the tort of battery). A companion of the lady (whose face is obscured) videos the entire incident and posts the edited version. The man, being quite annoyed by the extended video-taking, asks for the video-taking to stop and for the matter to be settled in a police station but this goes on until train station staff intervened.

I think the time has come where this "in your face" video-taking needs to be controlled. I can imagine instances of celebrities, girls or even men noticing videos being taken of them in public for extended periods of time even after requests to stop. Singapore does not have a law on privacy which is the right for people to be left alone but cases like these make one re-think whether this kind of behaviour should be condoned further.

In fact, other laws for action to be taken, or at least considered, could be in place--an example is the Miscellaneous Offences (Public Order and Nuisance) Act.

Section 13B of the Miscellaneous Offences (Public Order and Nuisance) Act--Causing harassment, alarm or distress--Any person who in a public place or in a private place (a) uses threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour; or (b) displays any writing, sign or other visible representation which is threatening, abusive or insulting, within the hearing or sight of any person likely to be caused harassment, alarm or distress thereby shall be guilty of an offence and shall be liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding S$2,000 (US$1,320).

I do not think that the provision has been used in this case scenario but the counter-balance for this offence is that the defence of reasonableness would weed out genuine uses of video-recording devices. Therefore, the end to paparazzi guerilla video-taping may be near.

Topics: Singapore, Emerging Tech, Hardware, Legal, Enterprise 2.0

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

2 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Time for stricter harassment laws?

    On the 23rd October 2007 oral and anal sex was legalised for heterosexuals only. The changes mean oral and anal sex between consenting heterosexual adults is no longer an offense but section 377A, which deals with oral and anal sex between consenting men, remains in force. "Singapore is basically a conservative society," the prime minister, Lee Hsien Loong, told MPs before the vote. "The family is the basic building block of this society. And by family in Singapore we mean one man, one woman, marrying, having children and bringing up children within that framework of a stable family unit." <a href="http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/2009/03/06/obama-lift-ban-funding-stem-cell-research/">Stem cell research</a> is a subject of controversy. Some stem cell research involves harvesting stem cells from embryonic tissues, which results in the destruction of the embryo. Obama has lifted the ban on stem cell research, making it easier for scientists to advance the study of their use and so scientists don't have to get a payday loan to do anything furthering the cause of humanity. The essential argument against is that it kills children, although zygotes (pre-embryos) and embryos are barely viable outside of the womb. The scientific community argues against banning studies, because they have demonstrated that stem cell research leads to techniques and treatments that can save and repair lives.
    FinnE
  • Time for stricter harassment laws?

    Hi,

    I have been receiving repetitive threats and abusive language which causes distress and emotional stress. I came across your article.
    About Section 13B of the Miscellaneous Offences (Public Order and Nuisance) Act--Causing harassment, alarm or distress--

    is there any chances that i can file a case?
    what is the process?
    anonymous