U.S. punishes Iran for Internet censorship practices

U.S. punishes Iran for Internet censorship practices

Summary: The U.S. government has imposed sanctions on Iran due to its alleged harsh treatment of bloggers and online journalists.

SHARE:
censorship iran america government sanctions online activist blogger journalist

The U.S. Department of State has placed sanctions on four Iranian individuals and five Iranian entities for the country's harsh treatment of bloggers, journalists and online activists.

The department announced the sanctions against Iranian individuals and entities -- otherwise known as governmental bodies or private companies -- for "having engaged in censorship or other activities that prohibit, limit, or penalize freedom of expression or assembly by citizens of Iran, or that limit access to print or broadcast media, including by jamming international satellite broadcasts into Iran, and related activities."

In addition, the department says "countless" activists, journalist, lawyers, students and artists have been detained, tortured and denied their human rights.

The sanctioned agencies include Iran's Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance, the Iranian Press Supervisory Board, and the Center to Investigate Organized Crime which helps "identify Internet users who published material insulting government officials," according to the AFP.

Iranian Minister of Communication and Information Technology, Reza Taghipour, is charged as the person responsible for ordering satellite television broadcast signal jamming and restricting access to the Internet.

Access to Gmail was temporarily removed in Iran this year as an "involuntary" consequence of trying to reinforce the censorship of Google's video-sharing website YouTube.

"Unfortunately, we do not yet have enough technical knowhow to differentiate between these two services. We wanted to block YouTube and Gmail was also blocked, which was involuntary," Mohammad Reza Miri, a member of the telecommunications ministry committee said. "We absolutely do not want YouTube to be accessible."

The department says that the move will prevent American businesses from trading or working with the sanctioned individuals and entities. In addition, each individual and member of the government agencies or private firms are banned from visiting the United States.

Government officials say that the sanctions are aimed at drawing worldwide attention to Iran's practices of censoring their citizens. In addition, the department wishes to prevent the Iranian government from creating an "electronic curtain" which cuts the Iranian general public off from the rest of the world.

Topics: Government US, Social Enterprise

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

3 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Ah it started so well...

    Acting against torturing suspects, detention without trial and other acts against basic freedoms should always be welcomed.

    Then it goes on to center around youtube and gmail... It's not quite the same really is it? Basic human rights violations versus a countries basic soverign right to decide which foreign products are available to it's citizens. Believe it or not they can actually block gmail, hotmail, ymail, etc completely legally. You'd only really question it morally if they said "no email" , but that isn't even half the issue. In the UAE apple can't sell iPhones with facetime on them... Probably better sanction them too.

    Utterly rediculous, there are real human rights issues out there, not being able to see talking cats is not a particularly pressing one... Although Ambesty International's next adverts should be interesting...
    MarknWill
    • I value your opinion but...

      Fighting for the simplest freedom no matter who and where it is initiated from is not violating a country's soveringty and I gather you have not lived in a society with restrictions as such. Any actions to limit the so called politicians (in reality the dictatorship elements) would be a welcome step for me and I applaud it. It is a matter of principle, and believe me, I know it.
      Nsaf
  • I'm actually dubious about such practices

    It's one thing to shame foreign governments for violating the rights of its own citizens (I'm all for that), but it's important both to not punish the citizenry along with the government, and to not give the government any outsiders to blame for the country's problems.
    John L. Ries