Will standardizing on a single browser today help keep IT costs at bay?
Summary: A new Microsoft-commissioned study makes the case that corporations do well by standardizing on a single browser. Microsoft's obvious hope and contention is that browser is Internet Explorer.
I don't often cover Microsoft-commissioned studies because of the seeming increased potential for biased results. But I'm bending my rules with a new study by Forrester Research commissioned by Microsoft about standardizing on a single browser in the enterprise.
Microsoft highlighted the study and provided a free download link for it via its "Exploring IE" blog this week. The reason I decided to take a look was my interest in how Microsoft is campaigning to get business users to standardize on Internet Explorer (IE) -- and hopefully not the older, not-so-standards-compliant versions of it.
Forrester's report, "The Business Case for Standardizing on a Single Modern Browser in the Enterprise," highlights answers from 133 North American IT pros and business-decision makers surveyed. Ninety-six percent of those surveyed said their firms encouraged standardization on a single browser for company-issued PCs. (So bring-your-own devices are excluded here.) But only 51 percent of those surveyed said single-browser use was enforced by lockdowns at their companies.

From the summary on the Exploring Microsoft blog post (which doesn't mention, by the way, that Microsoft commissioned this study -- but which Forrester does make quite clear at the top of its downloadable report):
"Forrester found that firms spend an extra $4,200 per web app annually to support multiple browsers. For a large corporation, that translates to almost $400,000 per year just for web apps. Any potential benefits were clearly outweighed by support, maintenance, and other costs - as most firms with multiple browsers experienced cost increases in excess of 20% overall. This is in line with conventional wisdom, which says to pick one browser but develop sites to common web standards."
Forrester found security and patch management, testing, and training (and to a lesser extent app-development costs) increased when businesses allowed deployment of more than one company-sanctioned browser.
Forrester analysts didn't tell those surveyed who commissioned this study (according to a note in the results). Nor did Forrester's report make any recommendations about on which single browser enterprises should standardize.
But Microsoft's blog write-up plays up the fact that IE10 is integrated with Windows 8 -- just as IE9 was with Windows 7. So if an enterprise has Windows, the implication is IE is the single browser you already have by default and the one that is the obvious choice for those looking to standardize on a single browser.
Even though IE's share is holding roughly constant at just over 50 percent of the market at this point, not every enterprise user and admin likely agrees that standardizing on one browser is a no brainer. Browsium, for example, is taking a different tack and is focused on giving IT browser-management tools via its Catalyst product (now in beta) for multi-browser shops.
"It’s not about only using one browser. It’s about giving IT the browser management tools they need to retain control, because the multi-browser enterprise is here to stay," said Gary Schare, Browsium President and Chief Operating Officer.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
Will standardizing on a single browser today help keep IT costs at bay?
And IE is easily serviced
"We standardize on IE" ?
You and your pet goldfish ?
Great idea for small business, but impractical for large enterprises...
We agree
Was perfectly fine to cover the study
If the results had been any different, then MS would not have allowed them to be published.
and you have proof of this?
What proof is needed?
Besides, I remember the news article posted in ZDNet several years ago about an MS-funded researcher who was fired for testifying about the security risks of software monocultures (the dismissal was vociferously defended by pro-MS Talbackers, as one might expect).
I want that edit button
The important thing to remember is...
Ack!
re: and you have proof of this?
I don't get it...
Because...
Most businesses already do.
As for compatibility...with nearly every version of Firefox & IE, I've found in my *personal* browsing experience that, if the problem isn't tied into a 3rd-party plug-in, then 4 out of 5 times it's *Firefox* that will have an issue with a page that gives IE no problems whatsoever.
However, because Mozilla's products are my personal favorite, I usually only use IE when a) I'm at work, or b) I happen across a page that doesn't work right in Firefox or Seamonkey. And it's been a while since I ran into a page that either one had a problem with, so my home IE usage is really, really low.
Benefits outweigh the dubious "I could use it on my phone" opportunity cost
1) It is the browser already included on all of that company's computers.
2) It is also the browser that offers the highest level of control for that company's network administrators.
3) It is also the only browser that works with the company's Active Directory - Integrated applications to reliably support single-sign on.
There is a cost associated with standardizing on IE in terms of platform flexibility and the ability to use it with a plethora of operating systems and devices, however there is also a number of valuable benefits as well - only one of which is a reduction in cost.
Modern browsers are mostly standards compliant and mostly compatible
* Patch Tuesday patching. This allows the browser to be part of the overall patching, testing and maintenance IT "rhythm"
* GPO capabilities. IE allows the enterprise to manage the browser using the same tools it uses to manage the rest of the desktop client environment
* Microsoft's 5+5 support lifecycle. Unlike the other other major browsers, IE has an enterprise friendly release and support lifecycle. Consumers and enthusiasts many like the browser of the month release cycles that Chrome and Firefox have, but they are inappropriate for enterprise environments.
"Browser of the month"...
Firefox has the answer
They need to do a better job of publicizing this, obviously.
That doesn't really compare to IE though