Wind technology design innovation would eliminate blades
Summary: A Tunisian company called Saphon Energy says it has designed a turbine using Zero-Blade Technology inspired by a sailboat that is more efficient and safer for wildlife.
Those of us who love the idea that wind-generated power could help reduce some of the world's fossil-fuels addiction are conflicted by stories of possible health side effects (headaches and worse) as well as the negative impact that some wind farms have had on bats and birds. Not to mention the noise and the aesthetics.
But what if you could make a wind turbine with no blades at all?
Yes, I know I just wrote about the world's longest blade which is fascinating in and of itself, well I just read this item over at TreeHugger detailing a scheme by a company called Saphon Energy to redesign the turbine layout to eliminate blades. Not only will this help with some of the noise concerns and danger to wildlife, but it will help turbines be more efficient, according to the company.
On its Web site, Saphon says the concept was inspired by sailboat designs. The company writes:
"The blades are replaced by a sail-shaped body, while both hub and gearbox are removed. Instead of spinning the blades' rotor, the wind is being harnessed by a sail, which follows a non-rotational back and forth motion. Such movement follows a knot path and allows the conversion of the majority of the kinetic energy into mechanical energy (using pistons). The same is then converted to a hydraulic pressure that could either be stored (in hydraulic accumulator) or instantly converted to electricity via a hydraulic motor and a generator. Thanks to the aerodynamic shape of the Saphonian, the drag force becomes the driving force of the system while the lift force becomes almost nil."
The design would allow turbines to overcome Betz' law, which limits how much kinetic energy a wind turbine can capture. Right now, most turbines can capture about 30 percent to 40 percent, but Saphon Energy believes its design will capture at least twice that amount, resulting in a more efficient turbine.
So, let's be clear. This is a theory that the company has prototyped (now in its second generation). But the company needs a manufacturing partner to take things farther. We've got at least two years to wait before this technology is maybe, possibly a reality.
The video below details more about the theory behind the Zero Blade Technology. Now, we'll need to keep an eye on the company to see if its idea works:
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
Cheaper and double the efficiency?
Theyre certainlly uglier which might be a problem for John Kerry who
Is that an "April's Fool" day video?
Makes claims .... but shows NOTHING.
How is the device going to capture wind power?? By having wind push?? (that is what it claims on the website). Yeah right!! Like that is going to produce better efficiency than rotating blades.
While blades can generate electricity with low strength wind (most common wind), this will require a hell of a lot more wind to actually generate power (if any). So the claim that it can be 40+% more efficient sound like BS.
Love logic.
I'm not the one who need to show proof
Could it be legit?? Sure, if they can prove the claims ... even if it is not as high as efficient as they claim. But so far, this sounds more like a tech scam than a real product.
Well I do agree that burden of proof is on their part.
"like that is going to produce better efficiency than rotating blades."
" a lot more wind to actually generate power (if any)."
Since those are your claims, then burden of proof is on you.
Maybe because I'm an engineer ...
They have to show PROOF of at least a concept. So far, they are just throwing around a lot of numbers (that sound too good to be true) with nothing to back them up.
Vid
Shows nothing at all.
Just some blah blah blah.
Their site is useless also.
Blame patent system.
Also those mentioned prototypes may be not so nice looking, or made just for testing.
And the 3rd point. This video may be pure PR to get media coverage to get more attention from manufacturers. (So you seeing anything specific there at all, may have not been on the list of priorities at all).
The patent is already filed
So why can't they give details on the invention?
So why the heck can't they give any meaningful details about what they actually have developed? If it's on the second generation prototype, why is it we only have some weird hand-wave about it being like a sailboat which pumps left and right and makes hydraulic pressure? Um.... the picture doesn't reflect that design. They've got a big disk with no apparent moving parts.
I smell a fraud.
Anyone who had a meaningful invention here at the second stage of prototyping would be able to explain SOMETHING about what they are doing.
This? Vaporware.
Patent system.
They already filed the patent
1. They have already filed their patent (and it doesn't appear to resemble the hype they are putting out).
2. Under the US patent system, you can make public disclosure and still have an entire YEAR to file patents on it.
Care to address either of these small flaws in your reasoning?
WO/2012/039688 patent uses blades
Hello supposed inventors: PROVE ME WRONG. State what the HECK you are doing that's new?
Give specifics. If you dare.
Love logic.
What part of the following don't you understand???
http://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=WO2012039688&recNum=25&docAn=TN2010000005&queryString=%28IC/F03D%29%2520&maxRec=4314
"equipped with a series of BLADES arranged all around it. The wheel (F) TURNS in a pivoting connection about a fixed axle"
This one:
Lets assume that this company have device covered in this patent ready for production. What that change?
Cann't they have one without blades. One that is not covered by this patent.
I do not understand why you jump to the conclusion that patent you have found describe device mentioned in the article. Why you insist on this company having only one invention, and only one research....
Maybe because it is the only RELATED patent
Because they are POINTING TO IT?
READ much? http://www.saphonenergy.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=83&Itemid=92
Sheesh.
Um... Saphons own website SAYS it's the patent on the device
http://www.saphonenergy.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=83&Itemid=92