Windows 8 launch: Time to nail those Windows Store myths
Summary: With less than a month to the launch of Windows 8, controversy still surrounds the Windows Store app market but it's based on a number of misconceptions.
Windows 8's new Windows Store is courting more than a little controversy, with gaming-industry figures from Minecraft's Notch to Valve's Gabe Newell expressing distrust and disquiet about Microsoft's move to add a new software distribution channel to its latest OS.
Listening to them, it sounds as though Microsoft is turning the PC into another iPad or Xbox, with a closed software distribution model that puts an end to the PC as a general-purpose computing device.
It's certainly a scary idea for any of us who've grown up with machines we've been able to program and customise. Are those PCs suddenly going to turn into appliances, where the software you use is dumbed down and curated by a malevolent entity set on extracting the last pennies from our pockets? Or has the rumour mill gone into overdrive again?

Let's take a look at how software gets run, and gets installed on Windows 8.
First we have the traditional desktop. Most applications that run on Windows 7 or earlier will run here. That means you'll install them in the same ways you always have, by downloading, by buying CDs and DVDs, by using flash drives. Windows applications are still Windows applications, and nothing has changed for them.
So if you've installed Java, you'll be able to download and play Minecraft, or install the Steam client and download any game you've bought there. There's no intervention from Microsoft, no oversight, no curation. It's the Windows world as you know and love — and hate — it.
That was the old Windows world, and it's not going away. Windows 8, however, adds the Windows Store and Windows Store Applications — what Visual Studio calls what used to be Metro applications — which have a whole new way of installation. And that's where the confusion comes in, because the Windows Store adds new certification processes, adding strictness to what has been ad hoc and unmanaged software distribution.
Store-only distribution model
There are two routes to the Windows Store. First, there's the Store-only distribution model for Windows Store applications. That's not the only way they can be installed on PCs and tablets, but we'll leave the complexities of enterprise sideloading for another day.
The Store-only distribution model requires apps to pass local tests that come with Visual Studio before being uploaded and handed over to the Microsoft approval process before they're certified, digitally signed, and listed in the Windows Store.
If they're paid applications, Microsoft takes a cut and processes all the transactions. But it doesn't take a cut of any in-application transactions, unlike some other app stores.
The second approach is for desktop apps that are listed in the catalogue, but not hosted by Microsoft. There applications need to be certified and signed with a digital signature, but are downloaded from the vendor's own site or a third-part app store. Microsoft doesn't process transactions and doesn't take a cut.
It's that last approach that Microsoft was suggesting Minecraft's Notch should take — certifying his code for inclusion in the store listings, while still downloading it from his own site.
Additional level of trust
As Raphael Rivera detailed on Within Windows, this approach wasn't locking Minecraft away in a walled garden. It was just giving it an additional level of trust and a new distribution channel built into the OS. If he did want to be part of the Windows RT distribution model, Notch certainly has the option of taking his existing Xbox code and turning it onto a Windows Store application, moving it from one closed-store model to another, with some code changes. But that's not what Microsoft was suggesting here.
The argument that the Windows Store is a walled garden designed to lock out other software distribution mechanisms is a pervasive one, but it's also easy to refute. All you need do is look at the store.
Take Gabe Newell's issues with the Windows Store, which seem to centre on it locking his own Steam online market out of the Windows ecosystem. One of the more amusing things you'll find while exploring the depths of the Windows Store is Microsoft's own strategy game Age Of Empires Online.
It's a desktop application, so the Store link takes you to a web page. If you follow the download link on that page, you're taken straight to another online store for the download. It's not just any store, either — it's Valve's Steam.
Just follow the steps:




Microsoft isn't turning Windows 8 into a walled garden like iOS, though the Windows RT distribution model for ARM tablets is similar to Apple's. What's actually happening is that new channels are being opened up, new ways of distributing and developing software that work alongside the familiar ways we've used for much of the past 25 years or so.
Walled garden? What Microsoft is delivering is more like a mix of country cottage garden, formal garden, and walled garden — with a greenhouse thrown in for good measure. It's a whole Downton Abbey gardens' worth of software distribution, and that's not a bad thing.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
Thanks for the article
Yes
The way it should be.
Contrast, compare, examine and explain. If you dont like something, say why, but dont declare its crap when its only crap in your mind and for your purposes.
If you like something say why you like it but do not pretend its the savior that will run other products off the shelves just because it fits your needs.
Balance is greatly appreciated and well deserved praise should be given for some even headed reporting.
Unfotunately, the critiques are correct
Not quite right. For apps written for the UI previously known as "Metro", it most certainly IS a walled garden. Desktop apps are still the same as usual... no walled garden, but if you want to write a Metro app, you HAVE to distribute it through Microsoft's walled garden, with the exception of Windows 8 Pro and the Enterprise side-loading option, which home users simply won't have access to, except for a small minority of IT experts.
"Listening to them, it sounds as though Microsoft is turning the PC into another iPad or Xbox, with a closed software distribution model that puts an end to the PC as a general-purpose computing device."
Because it is. Metro is already there and as Microsoft has told us over on MSDN, they intend to kill the desktop. But, even if they don't kill the desktop or don't do it for a long time, Metro is already a completely walled garden, and contrary to a post from someone else, Metro is NOT just for tablets, it's for non-tablets... it's for all Windows 8 machines too and it is what Microsoft is encourage us over on MSDN to develop for on desktop and laptop machines as opposed to the desktop UI.
This is a real concern and a real issue. Microsoft has announced to us in MSDN that they intend to deprecate the desktop eventually, which will turn Windows into a 100% walled garden. So yes, this is a very big concern and I, as both a developer AND a consumer, am extremely concerned.
Been using Windows 8 for a month now
Hopefully this article will open up a few people's eyes to how Windows 8 actually works.
Sure there are improvements that need to be made and they will be, example they need to add more visual cues to performing certain actions.
One big change to the desktop
One big change to the desktop
Now in windows 8 you have a list of apps which you can organize and group on the desktop in any fashion you wish. You can also name the groups anything you wish. You can pin as many apps as you like to the desktop or not pin any. If an app is not pinned to the desktop all you need to do is start typing the name of the app and you get a list of apps matching what you typed or you can bring up a full list of all apps on your computer just like you can with the start button. The only difference is searching through a vertical list (start button) or a list which is in coulmns and rows.
While it is a change it is not a change that is hard to learn ( 5 to 15 minutes tops)
And its the truth.
Its beyond me why the haters just cannot leave it alone. That goes for all the haters. Just because an OS of particular brand may be severely unappealing to you, for what may be excellent reasons for you, the pure failure to see that it dosnt matter how good your reasons are for you, others have their own reasons and they are better reasons for them. There is no point in trying to explain your way to victory when its just a colossal waste of time. And if you could have the simplest understanding of human nature and what comes out of that you would understand what a colossal waste of time.
For those who just don’t get it, here is how to think about it. If you love Linux, and you honestly feel that it has far more to offer overall than either OSX or Windows, how much luck am I going to have trying to convince you that you are out of your mind and that Linux is a waste of time? No luck. And you know why. It goes exactly the same for any other person who is happy with their OS of choice. Learn to accept the fact that no current major OS is a bad OS. It’s a fact. Some suit some people better than others. Like it or not it’s a real live fact and being a hater isn’t going to change reality.
And its the truth
Were you really that enamoured with the Start button?
Personally I think almost all of the griping about W8 is simply people don't like change.
Mini desktop (Start Screen) for the desktop
Great article!
Good article!!
As someone already said "non-sensationalist writing style is a refreshing".
Brilliant article!
I agree.
Trouble with "notch" is that his game has fueled his ego.
I don't see what his problem is. It's a terrible game anyway, not matter what distribution model.
You're missing the point.
Metro apps are in a walled garden
I've got no problem that a store exists and some business sideloading, but I want to distribute by myself without having MS getting in the way... And having MS in the way is the only way to the Metro apps.
No complain about the rest of Windows 8 which still have the old paradigm, just Metro app I complain about.
But it is okay paying apple for the
So what walled garden are you still referring to?
and if he did that
PLS Read reziol comment below
But I do believe that reziol below even expanciated better than I did in his article titled "Read the article again"
I can only hope that folks get pissed up with MS or any other company for that matter for a justifiable reason which in this case and on this particular subject I find lacking.