With changes, Apple's Cook takes decisive action for future
Summary: Apple's recent executive changes show a company configuring itself for the next decade -- and a chief executive who won't tolerate internecine warfare.

As Hurricane Sandy reconfigured the eastern seaboard of the United States, so did Apple chief executive Tim Cook, dismissing longtime exec Scott Forstall (most recently head of iOS) and retail chief John Browett in a series of executive changes announced last night.
Much will be made of the personality clashes that serve as the undercurrent to these changes, but the key takeaway here is that Tim Cook is circling the wagons after a rocky year in which the monolithic company began to reveal fissures.
That's why Jony Ive, Bob Mansfield, Eddy Cue and Craig Federighi will add more responsibilities to their roles at the company -- it seems that Cook thought there were too many cooks in the kitchen, with the result manifesting in products that increasingly grew apart.
Here's Fast Company's Austin Carr on just one battle, over skeuomorphic design, where digital things imitate the real-life objects they replace:
Inside Apple, tension has brewed for years over the issue. Apple iOS SVP Scott Forstall is said to push for skeuomorphic design, while industrial designer Jony Ive and other Apple higher-ups are said to oppose the direction. "You could tell who did the product based on how much glitz was in the UI," says one source intimately familiar with Apple's design process.
Apple's products will always be the collective effort of many people, but it's up to the company's leadership to smooth the edges so that the patchwork effect isn't jarring to the customer. In the paragraph above, you can see teams beginning to push their own agendas rather than an agreed-upon direction for the product as a whole. That's usually the first step toward corporate catastrophe.
(If you want to read more on the various storylines, read posts by Om Malik, John Gruber and reports by Jess Lessin and Nicks Wingfield and Bilton. All take different angles on this story.)
I'd like to focus on Cook. Here, we see the chief executive begin to change what he had been handed in the wake of former chief executive Steve Jobs' death. Many of the names mentioned above were hand-picked by Jobs for roles at that moment; here, Cook is heading off further trouble at the pass with decisive action. Perhaps his only regret might be letting some of that internal tension manifest itself in the products, from UI design philosophy to the Maps fiasco to whatever else might be out there.
No matter. The house that Steve built is becoming the house that Cook built, albeit slowly. So far, both eras seem to share the same philosophy of simplification: instead of allowing Apple's various branches to grow in their respective directions, Cook has reaffirmed the company's course (and values) by pruning what's out of line. It's not necessarily the best management strategy, but it has worked well for Apple.
One last point: none of these changes address the company's recent quality control issues. Cook may have excised conflict from the top ranks of his company, but a higher bar of expectation starts with him. Half-baked products are a company culture issue. That starts with Cook.
Photo: Kent German/CNET
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
signs the the ship is taking water
Wow
........http://goo.gl/0fzJS
The Hell??
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Yes
No, this is bad for Apple
Apple is trying to spin this as a good news story. It's a shame commentators pass on the propaganda line without scrutiny.
There is a good point hidden in this FUD
What you infer, and what's worth discussing further, is just how much conflict a company is willing to bear within its ranks. Positive conflict is what happens when a lot of good ideas from different viewpoints come to the same table and generate an agreed-upon solution; negative conflict is when people feel that their ideas are ignored and the company is headed in the wrong direction.
Ditch all the personalities and you've got a lot of followers and few leaders -- a military-like situation that prioritizes execution over strategy. I don't think this is the case at Apple, given how respected its other executives are in their respective disciplines (e.g. Jony Ive), but it's worth mentioning relative to your comment about "disposing of rivals."
Well, you have very valid points there.
1. Positive conflict - may keep the company in a balanced state and bring out good products. The heads will not leave the company unless there is a compelling offer from somewhere. This keeps the momentum and may actually lead to transformation of the company into more successful.
2. Negative conflict - will sink the ship because some of the heads will lose their jobs, and the followers in that groups would be under pressure until they get used to the newer stewardship. This where the leadership of the company may look like it is going under autocratic system or beaurocratic. The newer leadership needs to prove itself and know their assets, strengths and weaknesses. If the leadership fails in understanding this, or takes lot of time, it may fail. In these situations, a lot of new leaders take side of transactional, but it will fail because transactional leadership, eventhough it is not bad, puts lot of pressure on the team and weakens the team relationship. In these situations, the new leader should follow servant leadership rules.
If you start disposing your rivals, it will go to autocratic system and the entire system may fail. You need some critics always, who may sound bitter, but will give great boon to the ecosystem of the organization.
Yeah, Apple has peaked....
Deaf to their critics
Apple in self-destruct mode
There are two sides to every story. It's unlikely we'll ever hear both sides of this one. Even if the Maps apology story is true, it's reasonable to assume that he had compelling reasons not to sign, e.g. sticking to his principles, and because in reality the buck actually stops with Cook not him.
Let's see what you have to say in a year
iOS in decline
FUD or Troll Statement?
Just curious: Just what is a CEO supposed to do with an abrasive subordinate who apparently wasn't a team player? One of the other reports stated that Browett's firing was well received by the rank and file. Having served in the Army, I guarantee that if the troops are glad to see a superior leave, he or she should have left long before.
You read either like someone who loves FUD or like a Micro$oft troll.
Two sides to every story
Decline
I have new found respect for Tim Cook
I am still going to switch from the iPhone 4 to Windows Phone 8 (hopefully the Nokia 920 if it ever comes to Verizon) but I have new found respect for Apple and Tim Cook.