$1.5b enough for NZ broadband

$1.5b enough for NZ broadband

Summary: Telcos, power companies and the like tried to pull a fast one when they claimed the New Zealand Government might need to up its NZ$1.5 billion budget for the Ultra Fast Broadband roll-out.


Telcos, power companies and the like tried to pull a fast one when they claimed the New Zealand Government might need to up its NZ$1.5 billion budget for the Ultra Fast Broadband roll-out.

The arguments stem from the ambitious proposals submitted by all and sundry, who seek to roll-out broadband faster than the government's proposed 10-year time frame, some in as little as three years.

Indeed, the government's Crown Fibre Holding Company, which will manage the government's $1.5 billion scheme was somewhat inundated with proposals.

In what was called a "scramble", 18 organisations submitted proposals when the deadline passed at the end of January, according to TVNZ.

Telecom New Zealand was in there, and an international investor, now confirmed as Canada's AxiaNetMedia, which is building a broadband network in Singapore.

One proposal by a local lines company promised rural Franklin, just south of Auckland, speeds of up to 1Tbit/s completed within three years.

It is heartening to see such great support for the New Zealand broadband program from such a diverse range of outfits. It highlights the popularity of the government's approach along with the importance the country's technical community sees in broadband.

Indeed, it is the very fact that there is so much support for the government's proposals and so many bidding for the work that shows the NZ$1.5bn budget won't rise.

The 33 proposals from the 18 companies provide both the government and end users with choice. Like in other spheres, such competition will drive down costs, increase quality and improve value.

And we must not also forget Kiwi ingenuity. Just this week, news surfaced that New Zealand developers were developing software that can help firms plan more efficient fibre roll-outs, promising savings of 5 to 10 per cent — something that holds promise for Australia's NBN project as well.

As Crown Fibre Holdings assesses the bids, it can pick out the best deals for the taxpayer as well as end users. A more rapid roll-out than currently intended may put pressure on prices, but the competitive element and technological developments will counter that — something I am sure business-minded ICT Minister Steven Joyce knows all too well.

Topics: Broadband, CXO, New Zealand, NBN

Darren Greenwood

About Darren Greenwood

Darren Greenwood has been in journalism, not all of it IT, since the days of typewriters and long before the web spun its way around the world.

Coming from Yorkshire, he can be blunt, and though having resided in New Zealand, as well as Australia, for quite some time, he insists he is not one of the 'sheeple!'

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.


Log in or register to join the discussion
  • wow..

    1.5bill vs 43bill.... gosh.. I prefer their maths to ours.. although im assuming geography may be a major factor in aussie cost.
  • geography

    Your assumption is spot on. Australia is reasonably unique in that we have such a large area for such a small population. We're lucky that we're resource rich so can cover costs, but there arent many countries that need unused infrastructure like Australia does - only Canada might need so many 1000km roads between large population centres. Laying out the NBN has the same problem - a lot of essentially unused rollout just to get from one bunch of people to the next.
  • geography and costs

    As someone who has driven from Sydney to Perth and back, I can vouch that geography will be a factor in your higher costs.
    Australia also has five times the population, so more homes to cover as well.
    Kiwis also work cheaper!!
  • ?

    Isn't-the population most of them over the coastal area's? rather than spread out?