Analyst: Microsoft losing $2.5B a year on Office for iOS delay
Summary: In a case of "not if, but when," Microsoft may be losing out on about $2.5 billion a year by failing to expand its Office offering to iPhones and iPads, according to one analyst.

Microsoft could be leaving as much as $2.5 billion on the table by failing to get a version of Office for iPhones and iPads out the door, according to Morgan Stanley analyst Adam Holt.
The Redmond, Wash.-based software giant already has some software available for the iPhone and iPad in the pipeline—but as with Office, they have yet to make an appearance. It's now at the point where even Microsoft are "no longer bothering" to deny the rumors," according to ZDNet's Mary Jo Foley, but the company is far from being forthcoming about an expected release date or in what form a release may take.
According to Holt in a note to investors, he said that Microsoft could generate a greater return on Office, by as much as close to half of what Office earns today. $2.5 billion, in fact.
At the last earnings call, Microsoft's Windows division took first place in divisional rankings by revenue. The Windows division generated $5.88 billion, while the Business division—which houses Office and other services—generated a second-place $5.69 billion. Office is worth a great deal to Microsoft and brings in around 90 percent of the division's total revenue, just shy of one-fifth of the company's overall quarterly revenue.
For some time, it was even bigger than the Windows division.
Holt estimates that if it were to release Office for iOS for around $60, just shy of one-third of iPad users would snap up the software. Should the current iPad cumulative sales trend continue to 200 million by the end of 2014, Holt believes that Microsoft could generate around $2.5 billion in revenue on Office for iPad alone, after Apple collects its commission fees, of course.
Holt also adds that around 30-40 percent of Mac users install paid versions of Office 2008/2011 as Windows PC users do. The figure is a bit skewed, considering that some Windows machines come with a basic version of Office already installed.
"The math is compelling, and may drive Microsoft to move Office," he wrote.
It's a rough estimate, but it's more of a point to show that not only Microsoft generate vast sums more in its Office business than it does now, but also that Apple could end up capitalizing on Microsoft's expected runaway success with the mobile software.
But here's where it gets even more interesting. Microsoft may not pay that 30 percent fee to Apple, by circumventing the need to go through the iPhone and iPad's app store altogether.
One of the problems with bringing Microsoft software to iPhone and iPad is that Apple will receive a 30 percent cut of every sale. Many Microsoft apps are available for iPhone and iPad already—not limited to OneNote, SkyDrive and Lync—and are free to download, so the company avoids paying a 30 percent cut to Apple.
Foley notes that in whatever form an Office version for iPhone or iPad may take, Microsoft will likely battle the 30 percent cut that Apple will take from an app store purchase.
The way Microsoft could get around it is by offering it as a subscription service as it has done with some versions of Office 2013, or even develop a non-app store version in HTML5 so the company can serve it up without needing to rent space in Apple's store.
But bringing Office to the iPad could ultimately lead to the death throes of Microsoft's own strategy, notably with Surface—which remains the only tablet on the market with a 'legitimate' (used carefully, granted) version of Office installed.
Office for iPhone or iPad may seem frivolous to some, but it's an important bridge for bring-your-own-device (BYOD) users as well as ordinary enterprise users alike.
The majority of businesses still rely on Microsoft Office—in whatever incarnation, including partially Web-based Office 365—and iPad remains popular in the enterprise thanks to its back-end mobile device policy management.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.


Talkback
I really doubt it
iPad is not for work
Re: iPad not for Work
Bare bones?
Uh, do you know what "fully featured" means?
In business, Macros are a really big deal
it is close to Office on Mac rather than Office on Windows
Maybe not fully featured
The main problem with Office on RT is licensing. It's Home & Student version, so in theory it should not be used for work unless you buy another license which is good for work (but it doesn't change functionality, so macros still don't work). And it doesn't have Outlook. And it's desktop version. MS should really have made real tablet version for RT.
They will make a Office version
They will make an office version for RT long before they completely rewrite/port the code to objective c. Not to mention office for ipad is really unnecessary with more robust and usable devices being released almost daily. People will move away from ipad when they realize how much better the alternatives are, so the 2.5 billion/year "projected" profit would be rather short lived and not worth the effort long term.
Really?
I don't think so
And since the CocoaTouch APIs for iPad are so similar to Cocoa, porting it to iPad is a lot easier than coding from scratch. It is an unfathomable decision, not to release.
As to Surface - the Pro maybe. Nobody wants RT, from what I can tell. It does less than an iPad, by virtue of just not having the ecosystem.
A third bought it
I disagree with that...
I bet if MS Optimizes RT a little bit more and releases a new surface running on Tegra 4, people will want it.
I hate to burst your bubbble
No Way
Maybe
This.
Of course it makes sense
it has to be remembered, Microsoft is a software company, and always has been. Office's programs for the most part came out on Mac before they were made for Windows.
Precisely.
@ rahbm - But you're only looking at half the picture...