Apple: The iPad is falling behind the competition in one area
Summary: The iPad is still enjoying good sales, but the competition has left it behind with the ability to display more than one app at a time.
Apple's iPad competitors have been regularly trying to best the top seller in a number of areas. One of those has the potential to knock the iPad off its pedestal, and Apple better be thinking of a way to bring similar functionality to its tablet.

The feature that has the iPad beat is the ability to display at least two apps on the screen at the same time. In Windows 8, this is called snap view, and on Samsung Android tablets, it is multi-view. Both of these features let the user put one app alongside another at the same time to provide increased utility to the user.
This may not be easy for Apple with the iOS design of running one app at a time. There are strictly controlled exceptions to this rule, primarily to allow audio to play in the background while other apps are running onscreen. That's sorely lacking compared to the functionality in Windows 8 and on Samsung Android devices.
While the Windows snap view is pretty handy, I find Samsung's Android implementation to be more useful. This is largely due to the ability to resize either of the two app panes in any way that best fits. Windows restricts one app pane to be narrow and the other to take the rest of the screen.

Samsung first brought multi-view to its phone line, and then spread it to its Android tablets. I have used it heavily on both the Note 2 phone and the Galaxy Note 10.1 tablet. It positively rocks on the tablet, with enough screen real estate to make this a highly useful feature.
It's so good, I rarely use the Note 10.1 without having two apps onscreen with multi-view. It's not uncommon for me to have email on a narrow pane on the left, with another app, perhaps the web browser, in a larger pane on the right. Or I may have a Twitter app (Tweetings is my favorite) on the left, and the browser on the right. This is especially useful for tapping hyperlinks in tweets and having them open in the browser on the right.
I do similar things on Windows 8 with good results.

Samsung has also included the ability to cascade multiple app windows on the screen, so more than two apps at a time can be running and displayed. This can come in handy, as any app window can be selected and resized as desired. The windows can be positioned anywhere on the screen, so it's possible to have several apps displayed next to each other for those times when this makes sense.
The single app nature of iOS will no doubt make this functionality difficult to implement, but Apple better be working on this. As more consumers see that this is possible on other platforms, and the OEMs should be all over the advertising to let them know, they are going to ask themselves: Why can't they do it on the iPad?
Like any company in a competitive market, Apple needs to be moving the iPad forward in features and functionality. That means the ability to run and display multiple apps at the same time in this writer's opinion. While I have been known to state in the past that I like single app focus, and that's still true for intense work sessions, having used multi-view a lot, I have changed my view on how useful it can be at other times.
Related stories
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
James
Smdh...
Umm, I mentioned Windows
just to let you know...
Maybe because you said One Area
It costs 2 times more
Because it's not a tablet
Surface Pro is in competition with the MacBook Air, not the iPad.
Surface RT is in competition with iPad. It has a windowing desktop, but it limits you to running a handful of Microsoft apps (like Office, calculator, notepad) on the desktop and everything else has to run tablet style with the 1-up/2-up options.
If they'd add the functionality to it that Stardock's ModernMix application brings to Windows 8 (lets you run multiple Windows 8 tablet-style apps windowed on the desktop), it would just kick the crap out of Android or iOS.
They are different beasts
Re: Surface Pro is in competition with the MacBook Air
Surface Pro is a device in it's own category, one that the market is not really looking for (yet?).
Do you honestly believe that if windowing on a tablet made any sense, Apple would not do it? They have gone to great lengths to remove that functionality from their OS X UI APIs for iOS. A tablet is much more useful without the "desktop" metaphor.
Unfortunetely for Apple
iPad's solution is more intuitive...
FWIW, I don't hit home twice to bring up the app list. 4-figure swipe up...
Nice. I did not know that.
Good point
@BillDem
Note that switching between two apps is NOT the same as seeing two apps running side-by-side, so this article does not qualify.
That's not the same thing
The issue is viewing and working on two apps at once.
Not the Answer
Re: Surface Pro is in competition with the MacBook Air
you do realise Surface Pro is a full Windows laptop?
Agree
I personally believe Apple is working on an iOS-based device similar to a MacBook Air, but with a touch screen and full iPad compatibility.
The use case does sound silly
styli
I think you miss the point; a big point.
I still feel so many folk are missing the point; and so many folk are failing to see the benefits of using the touchscreen in laptop mode. You don't have to use touchscreen, but the option is pretty useful. Would I rather have multiple devices and mess around synching data OR one device. This is a no-brainer!