Jobs: 'No way to be sure' iPhone minerals are conflict-free
Summary: An email from Steve Jobs indicates that although Apple requires its suppliers to certify that they use conflict-free minerals there is "no way" for the company to be certain.
Apple customer Derick Rhodes was shocked after reading in the New York Times about the conflict raging in the Congo which supplies many of the minerals that end up in gadgets like mobile phones, computers and game consoles.
The minerals have been dubbed "conflict minerals" in a nod to the conflict diamonds -- according to Wikipedia, those mined in a war zone and sold to finance an insurgency, invading army's war efforts, or a warlord's activity, usually in Africa.
Since Rhodes was in the market to purchase an iPhone, he fired off an email to Apple CEO Steve Jobs asking about the source of the minerals used in the iPhone:
Hi Steve,
I’d planned to buy a new iPhone tomorrow – my first upgrade since buying the very first version on the first day of its release – but I'm hesitant without knowing Apple’s position on sourcing the minerals in its products.
Are you currently making any effort to source conflict-free minerals? In particular, I'm concerned that Apple is getting tantalum, tungsten, tin, and gold from Eastern Congo through its suppliers.
Looking forward to your response, Derick
Jobs responded:
Yes. We require all of our suppliers to certify in writing that they use conflict few materials. But honestly there is no way for them to be sure. Until someone invents a way to chemically trace minerals from the source mine, it’s a very difficult problem.
Sent from my iPhone
Wired verified the authenticity of the email response and suggested that Jobs' use of "conflict few" was a typo for "conflict free" which they attributed to the email coming from his iPhone.
Tip: Wired, Photo: Mark Craemer
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
Fascinating
:|
Apple and Foxconn is a problem, Minerals.. NOT
Apple should choose its suppliers better. Making profit is good, making profit at the expense of integrity is wrong, and Apple is walking a fine line here.
If Apple's products keep on failing with more issues:
- Lost Calls... Antenna issue.. Apple should provide free jackets
- Screen Issues -- Apple should replace units
- FaceTime -- Well this seems like a software issue easy fix.
- Camera -- Same as above
Apple has had a history of providing problematic products in the past, (eg infineon chips???). Its users have for the most part ignored these issues.
Its up to the users to determine what they should demand from Apple. But considering their profit margins, at the very least they should provide solutions for free and not ask users to pony up more money, that's just bad business all around.
China is a massive issue in Africa
You've got it completely backwards
honest
at least apple is giving an honest answer and not some pr drivel. foxconn is producing for sony, hp, dell, nokia, nintendo and apple among many others. where is your outrage here? otherwise your post is just the usual hypocrisy of an apple hater.
And the same is true of HTC, Dell, Samsung...
More comments from the mentally challenged unable to actually think for themselves.
One of the reasons the electronics I write software for have CPU cards that cost $5,000 is because we CAN track the origin of the materials. 5K for a processor card with a 132 MHz processor and 2 MB of RAM.
Until people are willing to pay 3K for a DVD player, 15K for a 30" LCD TV, 2K for a cell phone, 250K for a Kia Soul, what Steve Jobs said is very true.
If this is failure...
You need a reality check, my friend.
RE: Jobs: 'No way to be sure' iPhone minerals are conflict-free
Name me one company that can.
RE: Jobs: 'No way to be sure' iPhone minerals are conflict-free
It's unfortunate.
TripleII
Can't edit.
I try to edit the above to add "expose them ([B]the supplier that is[/B])" but each time I try and hit "submit" I see the messages "This has been reported as spam".
TripleII
The new talkback system is infuriating
When you edit..
You have to delete the {br} and hit return to put in proper paragraph breaks. Yes the new forum editing SUCKS which is saying a lot for a web site run by supposed IT professionals <img border="0" src="http://www.cnet.com/i/mb/emoticons/sad.gif" alt="sad">
Message has been deleted.
RE: Jobs: 'No way to be sure' iPhone minerals are conflict-free
true
but do you also understand that your statement holds true for any other company? dell, hp, nokia, sony, nintendo, everyone is producing at the same suppliers in china nowadays.
RE: Jobs: 'No way to be sure' iPhone minerals are conflict-free
Absolutely understand that it applies to everyone! And the problem is way bigger than a lot of folks understand. For example, the current administration is touting the need for energy indepnedance by going to green technologies. Guess what? There are many minerals, etc for which China is the world's primary supplier that go into all the green technologies. End result: trading energy dependance for mineral (& technology) dependance. All those "green jobs" that will supposedly be created? Already in China.
Remember, the US business model is buy low, sell high. It applies to Apple, Wal-Mart, and green products. Low prices from China, high prices to the consumer, and CEOs get rich.
I dislike Apple generally - but posing the question is idiotic
If that's the standard, then what about the general population using imported oil from the middle east? That's one conflict after another.
You want to nail Apple for something, how about exporting jobs overseas?
jobs
how about creating around 25.000 jobs in the us over the last decade? get your facts straight, than your apple dislike doesn't come off as clueless as it does now.