ie8 fix
madison

Microsoft to begin automatic Internet Explorer upgrades in 2012

By | December 15, 2011, 5:00am PST

Summary: In a major policy change, Microsoft plans to deliver IE upgrades automatically to Windows users. That moves IE incrementally closer to its fast-paced competitors, although there are still enough exceptions to keep enterprise users happy.

In January 2012, Microsoft will begin installing the latest version of Internet Explorer on Windows PCs automatically, via Windows Update.

Automatic browser updates will begin rolling out worldwide in Australia and Brazil and will gradually scale up to additional countries and continents over time. Customers running Windows 7 and Windows Vista will be updated to Internet Explorer 9. Those who are using Windows XP will get Internet Explorer 8—the highest version available for that platform.

The new policy represents a major change for Redmond, which currently classifies new browser versions as Important updates but requires the user to manually consent before installing an upgraded version.

With this change, Microsoft joins Google and Firefox, both of which currently push out automatic updates to all users. The big difference is that Microsoft will continue to support older versions of browsers. That’s a crucial distinction for enterprise customers, who need to test and approve any new software release before deploying it and who have complained loudly about Mozilla’s decision to drop support for all but the most recent browser version with their new rapid-release cadence.

Multiple opt-out mechanisms will be available for businesses and consumers who choose not to upgrade:

  • If you previously refused an update to IE, you will not be automatically updated.
  • As is the case today, you’ll be able to uninstall an Internet Explorer update and roll back to the browser that came with your Windows version.
  • Enterprises can block the automatic installation of IE updates using Microsoft’s Blocker Toolkit for IE8 and for IE9.
  • Microsoft has committed to making opt-out mechanisms available for future IE releases as well.

Although its new update policy is more aggressive, Microsoft hasn’t announced any plans to pick up the tempo at which it releases new browser versions. IE9 was released in March 2011, and IE 10 is on pace for a release date roughly one year after that. By the standards of the last decade, that’s agile, but both Google and Mozilla have reset expectations in this regard, pushing out new versions every six weeks.

More details are available in the official announcement at the IE Blog.

Related posts:

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Ed Bott is an award-winning technology writer with more than two decades' experience writing for mainstream media outlets and online publications.

Disclosure

Ed Bott

Ed Bott is a freelance technical journalist and book author. All work that Ed does is on a contractual basis.

Since 1994, Ed has written more than 25 books about Microsoft Windows and Office. Along with various co-authors, Ed is completely responsible for the content of the books he writes. As a key part of his contractual relationship with publishers, he gives them permission to print and distribute the content he writes and to pay him a royalty based on the actual sales of those books. Ed's books written prior to fall 2011 have been distributed by Que Publishing (a division of Pearson Education) and by Microsoft Press. As of November 2011, Ed is a partner in the independent publishing company Fair Trade Digital Exchange, which exclusively publishes his books.

On occasion, Ed accepts consulting assignments. In recent years, he has worked as an expert witness in cases where his experience and knowledge of Microsoft and Microsoft Windows have been useful. In each such case, his compensation is on an hourly basis, and he is hired as a witness, not an advocate.

Ed does not own stock or have any other financial interest in Microsoft or any other software company. He owns 500 shares of stock in EMC Corporation, which was purchased before the company's acquisition of VMware. In addition, he owns 350 shares of stock in Intel Corporation, purchased more than two years ago. All stocks are held in retirement accounts for long-term growth.

Ed does not accept gifts from companies he covers. All hardware products he writes about are purchased with his own funds or are review units covered under formal loan agreements and are returned after the review is complete.

Biography

Ed Bott

Ed Bott is an award-winning technology writer with more than two decades' experience writing for mainstream media outlets and online publications. He's served as editor of the U.S. edition of PC Computing and managing editor of PC World; both publications had monthly paid circulation in excess of 1 million during his tenure. He is the author of more than 25 books on Microsoft Windows and Office, including the recently released Windows 7 Inside Out.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?
94
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

Sites that don't work, use Compatibility view.
rwparks.it 9th Jan
I cringe at first when hearing about automatic IE updates.

Have experienced too many times where the new version for the browser would not work on certain websites (i.e. some financial websites written for IE6 would not work on IE7, and some on IE7 had IE8 or higher). Then solution then was to remove the newer broswer version and revert/reinstall the older.

There is a saving grace that IE 8 and IE9 have a 'Compatibility View' (under Tools). This has the potential to work on some of these sites with older requirements.

Do you have any success stories using this feature?
0 Votes
+ -
Glad it's optional..it's not like browser updates are critical enough that they need to be installed that second when I'm trying to do other things. I like that they are there for people who want them and are set to auto by default because I know a lot of newbs out there wouldn't update (for years sometimes lol). I update my browser before doing anything important or purchases and I don't think I need an auto update when I'm just browsing.

I check Firefox at least once a week..I'm sick of Chrome taking up system resources or not loading right away because it's updating when I'm just going on it to read or maybe play Words with Friends..so much so I'm thinking of just dumping Chrome..I know there is a way to disable auto in Chrome but it's not a simple thing to so I haven't attempted it yet and it should be an option for advanced users...
@ChrispyCritter ... I understand your frustration about it, but browser updates exist for a reason and YES, they usually ARE critical enough that they need to be installed right away. I can't count the number of users I've removed viruses for that could have avoided it if they'd had their system updated.
@GoodThings2Life I'm usually the one removing viruses for others..for them maybe it's critical but I don't need an update that min or day..unless I'm about to purchase something it's not all that important to me. I don't remember the last time I had a serous issue with a virus it's been that long..probably more than 3 years ago when I was still using XP...
@GoodThings2Life Sorry, but I know of a lot of headaches caused by people who DID upgrade (in an enterprise environment). The web pages were coded for a specific version of IE and did not work with newer versions. And, no, they could not upgrade the applications due to licensing issues.
0 Votes
+ -
Chrome Updates
mejohnsn 15th Dec
@GoodThings2Life But both Google and Mozilla have got into the bad habit of creating 'churn' in the browser by pushing out various 'fixes' before they are ready and then having to issue yet another new version in a short time to fix the problems they created with the previous release.

Google started it by deciding to push so much of their software on the world while it was still beta -- and then just not talk about a distinction between beta and release!
0 Votes
+ -
Chrome slowing you down?
Joe.Smetona 15th Dec
@ChrispyCritter ...

"""I'm sick of Chrome taking up system resources or not loading right away because it's updating when I'm just going on it to read or maybe play Words with Friends..so much so I'm thinking of just dumping Chrome..''''

I've been using Chrome since it was first available, before it was released, up to the present. I have used it on many computers, both Windows and Linux, and have never experienced any slowdowns from it updating. It's been totally invisible, and that's even on non dual core computers. With my dual core HP with 1.7 Ghz processors and Linux, It's never a factor in anything also.
0 Votes
+ -
@Joe.Smetona When Chrome is up and running it is fast but when you open it cold it always checks for updates and takes a second. I tend to close my browser a lot..just recently it updated even when it wasn't open. My cursor started showing the loading symbol and I was like why and when I looked it was Chrome auto-updating.

I'm not running short of resources but I don't like it using them without asking. Chrome takes longer on startup to load than Firefox..now maybe it's my Google.com home page but I'm using that homepage on both browsers and am signed on both also. Chrome was my default browser for awhile when Firefox was having issues but with all the updates/changes Chrome is becoming a bit "bulky" and if it gets much worse I'm dumping it altogether.

I installed Chrome because it was a light browser but lately Firefox is faster. I have 64bit Win7,4gb RAM (soon to be 8gb) and a quad-core so I don't even use 3gb RAM. I also clear my browsers quite a bit..Chrome just takes a second on cold startup..even longer than IE it seems anymore...
0 Votes
+ -
Reply to Crispy Critter.
Joe.Smetona Updated - 15th Dec
@CrispyCritter... That's very interesting, especially with the the resources you are using. I believe you, but I suspect you have other gremlins.

I bought my HP dual core, AMD 7550, 1.7 Ghz, 2 GB of RAM with on-board NVidia graphics for $241. new, including shipping. I've since replaced the onboard graphics with an ATI, 2 GB, PCI 16X discreet card. I'm still using 2 GB main memory. (With Linux MInt 11 and 12).

Chrome always seems to be updating, but I never notice it. I check the "About" and it seems every time I check it, it's a different version.
@Joe.Smetona I wondered why Chrome booted my homepage so slow and I noticed when I click "about Chrome" it is checking for updates..the actual browser itself opens in an instant like everything else but because it's checking updates is slows down the speed of my home page's loading as far as I can tell and only with Chrome.

I don't get why there is no advanced option to disable it and for me to be able to check manually. The only way I have seen to disable it involves messing with the registry..I'm capable of doing so but I haven't bothered and am close to just dropping it as my secondary browser..maybe I'll start using IE as a 2nd as it seems IE has improved greatly the last couple years...
@Joe.Smetona I use chrome and ff. IE is a rather slow poke. SOme MS updates mess up pcs
@Joe.Smetona You've got the added benefit of Linux in that it's the OS updating Chrome and Firefox, not the browsers themselves, and the system can update programs that are still running and will replace the files when they're no longer in use, so the update process is very transparent. Heck, you can even DELETE a file in use and it'll be deleted once the file is closed. happy
@CrispCritter

Seriously wrote "I don't like it using them without asking. "

How do you do your computing, sat looking at process explorer all day?

Why are you opening and closing your browser a lot.

You seriously need to stop micromanaging your computer, and let is get with its job.
0 Votes
+ -
@Bozzer My Desktop PC monitor on a swivel is right next to my recliner hooked to my HDTV also. I close my browsers a lot is for various reasons but I more recently started doing it as I used to leave them open..I found when I left browsers open all day they tend to eat up more memory so when not in use I close them..plus I use 2 browsers for different things but Firefox stays open a lot more.

I'm a bit of a tech geek so I do a lot of things normal people don't like I leave Task Manager running and look at it several times a day paying attention to what is running how much memory is being used,what is using the most memory and other things. A lot of times I'm watching TV and I browse during commercials. I used to online game a lot on Playstation (Socom mostly at one point playing over 1,500 hours in game in a year) and that's how my computer ended up next to my recliner...
@ChrispyCritter "I wondered why Chrome booted my homepage so slow and I noticed when I click "about Chrome" it is checking for updates.."

Not sure if this is worth mentioning, but when you click About, it checks for updates *at that moment*, solely because you went into About; you didn't just happen to catch Chrome checking for updates when you clicked About.
0 Votes
+ -
@dh1760 Yeah it could be some other issue..maybe I should remove Chrome and reinstall just to see if it loads better. I know sometimes programs can become sluggish after awhile but if it is it's the 1st I've ran into on Win7. I also just did a full anti-virus scan and some maintenance.

It's only on Chrome's start up that I see it not any other programs and my PC boots up quickly. Also there is the possibility that because I'm using Chrome and am logged into Google's server there cloud server is just causing it to load a bit slow. I don't get it with Firefox logged into Google though and I know it's not my connection because I'm only running this computer hard wired on a 20+Mbps connection...
@ChrispyCritter

Recent versions of Firefox are quite noticeably faster than Chrome at things like starting up and rendering big pages. If you use "Web Apps" (heavy JavaScript sites) you might notice Chrome being faster -- but it'll be using a lot more RAM and system resources while it's doing it.

That said, Firefox still makes a major CPU grab every time you download a new file, and if if one tab is struggling for some reason, all the others do, too, while in Chrome things still work in other tabs. For me, I prefer Firefox (not to mention the moral reasons for using it)...But to each their own.
@jdakula Yeah I prefer Firefox too but for awhile there Firefox was sucking glad it was only a couple months..might see spikes in CPU use but even on my low end AMD Quad-Core it hardly ever strains..rarely using over 10-20% CPU. I only started using Chrome when it came out to try it and at the time is was great. It was nice simple browser that was good to use for some sites but lately I ask myself why I even need anymore it really.

Even if I wanted to be on the same site on different user names (I play Words with Friends on FB and I was playing Farmville because of my sister and her children on 2 accounts) I can just use a different identity profile on Firefox. There was a time when Chrome loaded some sites a lot better than Firefox but it doesn't seem to be that way anymore. I probably won't dump Chrome but I might unpin and not use it much...
@ChrispyCritter

There actually is a simple way from within Chrome: type about:plugins in the address bar, find Google Update in the list and disable it.

There are other, slightly more complicated ways involving Component Services.
@huygens1962 From what I've read it doesn't disable it and sure enough after I disabled it and went to "about Chrome" it still checked for updates. Even if I could disable it then there is no way to update it..it's a crap design...
@ChrispyCritter That's my mother's philosophy too... "I don't want these stupid things popping up when I'm trying to do things... I don't have time for this..." and because of that her Java doesn't get updated, her Flash doesn't get updated, her Adobe Reader doesn't get updated, and Win7 SP1 didn't get installed. If I didn't have her using Opera with automatic updates turned on, that'd never get updated either and she'd be even more vulnerable.
@jgm@... I'm not your mother and I have been manually updating things for at least 5 years..but I understand a lot of people are like your mother..I'm someone who keeps my desktop computer running pretty much 24/7 and this computer hasn't been off more than a few days since 6/2009 and reboots..that was only because I was away. Also I follow a lot of tech people all over the internet (read tech stuff daily) so when really urgent Windows updates are released I know about them that day usually...
@ChrispyCritter my biggest problems with some updates is that they mess up pcs.
@ChrispyCritter: What are you on about? Chrome updates completely silently and only asks you close/restart at your leisure.
@bradavon If it's completely silent then why did I notice it updating to a new version the other day when Chrome wasn't even open?..Google needs to add the option of disabling it and I'm not the only one who believes that do a search you will find plenty of posts on it...
Thank God. I know many folks that could use this.

Good to see IT has an option to escape this. but God knows, many folks there need a kick in the pants too.
@Cylon Centurion +1
Good first step, I'd say. But they really do need to increase the frequency with which they issue updates. Even once in 6 months would do. I am sure that is not going to happen anytime soon though.
0 Votes
+ -
Updating browsers, in the case of IE, provide additional revenue streams for Microsoft. It's primary purpose is not to enhance security or provide better user experience.

It's also a valuable asset for Microsoft to incorporate further data gathering into a large number of customers who still use older versions of IE. Most businesses that I've seen use IE6 and actually stipulate that it should not be updated. Timkeeping, HR, Retirement and various company software only work on IE6. This change is now making it the IT departments responsibility to disable this change.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
Absolutely untrue
Ed Bott 15th Dec
@Joe.Smetona

I have investigated extensively, and I can say with confidence that your accusation of "additional data gathering features" is completely unsupported by any facts.
0 Votes
+ -
I read what he wrote and LOL'd
Joe_Raby 15th Dec
@Ed Bott

He says he's used Google Chrome since it came out and he's worried about Microsoft collecting user data??!

Ya, he has his priorities straight there.... (sarcasm)

Google Chrome tries to open 10+ connections back to the mothership when you open it, even when your homepage is blank. Not on my PC!
0 Votes
+ -
Reply to Ed Bott.
Joe.Smetona 15th Dec
@Ed Bott ... The incentive I have seen for browser development has always been for operations directed to online advertising revenue. I wouldn't expect to find any direct facts with IE browsers, mostly due to their being closed source.

To me it's a given based on the Microsoft attempt to buy Yahoo for 44.6 billion dollars some years back. This signaled Microsofts' keen interest in competing with Google in the online advertising area. I'm questioning the motives for this mandatory upgrade based on that history. Albeit, having an OS, without question, has to be the most profound way to gather user data. Everything must pass through the OS and perhaps search engine and browser functions take on a secondary role.

I use the open source Chromium along with Chrome. To me there isn't a noticeable difference, they operate in an identical manner. Firefox is open source, so I wouldn't expect to see proprietary operations to possibly encrypt and transmit data.

Microsoft, for almost all users, is always running as a mystery and I'm certain that some individuals within their community, such as yourself, do have additional knowledge.

I use Statcounter and the results displayed are impressive. Someone can determine the search term used in Google and what web pages were accessed with no difficulty at all. I'm sure Bing operates in a similar manner. Using a browser for data gathering is something to be taken for granted., to some extent.

I have used the Mutek Black Box years ago and it provided over 30,000 entries by just opening a program and closing it. It's probably one of the best ways to indirectly find out what a program is doing.

Initially, from you article, it would seem that automatic "changing of the browser" would adversely affect a great number of average users. To me, recent Internet Explorer browsers have developed a very heavy appearance, further complicated when the user starts adding Bing toolbars. When this is coupled with UAC prompts, it becomes very busy. Perhaps automatically upgrading a browser for the "average Joe" might cause some undesirable effects. I would not expect a good portion of the computing public to disable it, possibly even some commercial users would miss it.
0 Votes
+ -
Reply to Joe Raby. Unfounded accusations.
Joe.Smetona Updated - 16th Dec
@Joe Raby.

@Joe_Raby...

What do the connections do?. I guess I'm supposed to rely on your observation that they are for spying. I'm sure you realize that connections are opened with Firefox and Internet Explorer also. You realize, Google has to work as an efficient browser and 100% of its design can't be devoted to spying as purported by some of the posters. That's just common sense.

If someone reads the Google Privacy policy and comes to understand how they work, it would be beneficial since it is a legal document. I have come to view the MS EULA as an open document allowing global operations, always in Microsofts favor. It's legal, but a legal document could legally allow them to do anything.

Do you think the processes have anything to do with making Chrome more efficient with Googles' 1,000,000+ servers? Google is bigger and better than Microsoft Web and my experience with Chrome has been seamless since I began using it. It works great for me as do all Google services including their DNS.

http://www.colocationamerica.com/blog/google-has-an-estimated-1-million-servers-and-counting.htm

So the next time you start trying to talk down Google, take a look at their achievements.

Temple University recently dumped Outlook and went to GMail. It's a tremendous savings and success. Important messages aren't bounced back because the Inbox is always full like in Outlook. Do you think they have any reservations about Google privacy with their 10,000 users?

http://temple-news.com/2008/11/11/gmail-taking-over-tumail-transition-this-week/

"After deciding to look for a new e-mail system, Stahler said the number of universities using Google mail pushed Temple to make the jump, as well."

???When we began the process, we had a list of 50 recognizable universities. Google says there are hundreds,??? Stahler said. ???One of the really important reasons is that we just can???t keep up with the technology.???
0 Votes
+ -
@Joe.Smetona

...shouldn't have computers connected to the Internet.

If you have a web app that only runs in IE6, it should be virtualized and run without external network access. Requiring XP still is just dumb. Get a better software vendor that supports a current OS, because when you get new computer hardware, you're going to be in for a world of hurt when it comes to driver support. Most newer motherboard chipsets don't support XP anymore.

Ask your software vendor how much they invest into R&D for future platform support. The worst vendors are those that only support the new platform when the OS vendor stops supporting the old one completely. Those kinds of vendors are bad news. They don't want to spend anything on innovating their product. Instead, they want to sell it off as-is and then just turn their devs into support pro's to get as many customers as possible into a support contract. It's a money grab that involves very little head-work, so those vendors aren't IT strategic. Steer clear.
0 Votes
+ -
@Joe_Raby

May not have any choice in the matter!

That decision may have come down by executive fiat; you know that kind, the one that says: "increasing shareholder value is paramount!"

Need I say anything more?
@Joe_Raby, I agree. Being a developer, I am pained by lack of forward vision in IT departments and vendors. Our job as developers is to write apps that can be upgraded as systems change, we should always be learning the new things on the horizon. I have worked for a rather stuck company in the past and they did not have any plans on how to move off of the VB6 codebase. They are probably still running VB6 code today (they were still running a couple Netscape Servers when I was there 6 years ago).
@Joe_Raby

And IE6 support doesn't end until April 8, 2014 so yes, many IT departments are still using it. And like XP, I doubt they'll change until the last minute. That's the way it is.

MS only has themselves to blame for supporting it as long as they have.
@Joe.Smetona

First of all I think your belief of the quantity of applications that still require IE6 is vastly over estimated but like the other Joe said if that is the case then the App should be virtualized or run in some other sort of session.

Secondly Microsoft makes it very easy for IT departments to manage what updates the computers get. Even small businesses can set up WSUS or something to manage and allow approval of updates with minimal effort.

I suggest you let go of the hate because it is making your talk nonsense.
0 Votes
+ -
@bobiroc

....even Intune lets you manage updates.

For a startup MSP, $14/mth/PC isn't a bad price to charge to customers (resellers get rebates back - that's just the retail price), and then you can just add-on whatever service charges you want on top ie. setup, on-site charges, phone support, etc.
0 Votes
+ -
@bobiroc ... Worldwide engineering companies use XP and mandate IE6. If people upgrade to Firefox, IT sends mass emails to everyone informing them to remove Firefox and if it is not removed, it will be automatically deleted from your workstation on a specific date (usually a week later). Sorry, I don't know your experience, but I have plenty with large worldwide companies with over 100,000 computers. They are using XP and IE6 and don't want to spend the money to re-write their entire system. And if someone want to access these company websites with Chrome, Firefox or IE-8, it won't work properly and IE-6 will have to be used. I see suggestions, but money is tight and things are going to stay XP and IE-6... with minimal support.

If someone's not there to pull the fuse in time, you are going to see a gigantic mess because all the company tools will be shut down. This is not a good idea.

I met with Microsoft when they introduced XP SP1, which did not close files on Windows 2000 Servers. It was a horrible mess for our customers and initially we thought our CAD program was at fault. That is, until we noticed files not closing with Word. You would open a Word file, make changes and when you needed to save it, it would take you to "Save As" because the Save was grayed out. That's because the original file would not close and it was asking you to save under a different filename. Files had to be closed from the server. Customers were going nuts, MS gave us two options: remove SP1 or if that wasn't possible, reinstall Windows and do not install SP1.

12/16/2011...."I suggest you let go of the hate because it is making your talk nonsense." Actually, there's no hate. Microsoft has been doing a lot of bad things to a lot of people for a long time". A lot of people know what they do and have a strong dislike for it. Especially, their double dipping on licenses and they aggressive actions toward competition. I was using computers before MS and have seen a lot. They did bring computers into ordinary homes and businesses, but at what cost?
0 Votes
+ -
@Joe.Smetona "in the case of IE, provide additional revenue streams for Microsoft. It's primary purpose is not to enhance security or provide better user experience." Wow didn't know you were on the MS board...that's amazing thank you.

OH! and don't for once think Google isn't gathering info either NOPE no way, they walk on water...

Good luck with that.
It will get ugly.
aaaahhhhh... the only way they can get people to download it, is to force it..... tut tut
@deaf_e_kate

Did you even read the article? Let me point out the key points for you.

"Multiple opt-out mechanisms will be available for businesses and consumers who choose not to upgrade:

1.) If you previously refused an update to IE, you will not be automatically updated.
2.) As is the case today, you'll be able to uninstall an Internet Explorer update and roll back to the browser that came with your Windows version.
3.) Enterprises can block the automatic installation of IE updates using Microsoft's Blocker Toolkit for IE8 and for IE9.
4.) Microsoft has committed to making opt-out mechanisms available for future IE releases as well"
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
Only 100 million people
Ed Bott Updated - 15th Dec
@deaf_e_kate

Poor IE9. Only 10% market share after nine months. Oh. Wait. That's over 100 million users who chose to download, install, and use it?

That's a very strange definition of failure.
@Ed Bott

In her defense I have worked on about 50 or so computers in my side jobs running Windows 7 that I installed it on. And businesses that use WinVista or 7 have begun rolling out to their clients too because they usually wait a few months at least to make sure things work OK within their environment with any new version of software.

Of course I constantly run into computers with Chrome on it to which many people claim that they have no idea how it got there or how it became their internet browser default.
@Ed Bott

So, exactly half of the number of Chrome users --- who genuinely sought it out and chose to download and install, rather than just dumbly taking whatever Microsoft dumps on them ?

According to the company, there are now 200 million active Chrome users.

http://www.tomshardware.com/news/google-chrome-market-share-browser-wars,13721.html


[ Disclaimer: I neither like nor use Chrome. ]
@Ed Bott I chose to download and install it and I only choose to use IE9 maybe once a month if that often :P Although IE has taken some big steps with IE8-9 in the right direction...
@Claverhouse
... meh ... more than half the folks I see with Chrome installed say "I've no idea how that got on here'. I do, it is selected by default in tons of other software and/or software updates, e.g., Java, Open Office , etc.
So that purposefully sought out and installed Chrome, is pure rubbish.
@Ed Bott

There's actually another issue with Chrome. It's actually possible to install Chrome without admin rights to the machine, as it installs to the user's profile as opposed to the Program Files directory.... Makes it a lot easier to unintentionally install as well.
0 Votes
+ -

...Google and Mozilla have reset expectations in this regard, pushing out new versions every six weeks.

I cringe at first when hearing about automatic IE updates.

Have experienced too many times where the new version for the browser would not work on certain websites (i.e. some financial websites written for IE6 would not work on IE7, and some on IE7 had IE8 or higher). Then solution then was to remove the newer broswer version and revert/reinstall the older.

There is a saving grace that IE 8 and IE9 have a 'Compatibility View' (under Tools). This has the potential to work on some of these sites with older requirements.

Do you have any success stories using this feature?

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix