Between the Lines

Larry Dignan, Andrew Nusca and Rachel King

Apple tops reputation survey; Facebook a 'non-factor'

By | February 13, 2012, 7:55am PST

Summary: Apple and Google have topped a recent poll of reputable companies and brands. But Facebook doesn’t appear on the list at all.

Apple has topped the ranks of other world-leading brands, organisations and consumer-focused product manufacturers, as having the best image for any American company.

As one might expect, in the midst of a Eurozone crisis and continued economic hardship, financial institutions ranked the worst.

Apple arrived at the top spot in Harris Interactive’s annual public opinion poll on online brands. It even outperformed Google, which was relegated to number two. Not only that, the Cupertino-based company ranked higher than any other company ever had in the poll.

Last year, Apple brought out the long awaited iPhone 4S, amid disappointment over its lack of iPhone 5-goodness. The technology giant nevertheless outsold its previous range of smartphones in a record time, with over 4 million by the first weekend.

Out of just shy of 13,000 respondents, companies were ranked based on six qualities, including: leadership, financial performance, emotional appeal, workplace environment, social responsibility, and the quality of products and services.

Apple scored 85.62 on the scale out of 100, with Google following just behind on 82.82. Apple gained by the company driving for near-perfect product quality and its environmental record. In regards to emotional rapport, Steve Jobs’ death is understood to have played its part in reviving empathy for the company.

But the company lost out on its position in China, where controversy bubbled just before and after Christmas, where workers at the Foxconn plant threatened suicide. Apple had been accused for supporting poor working conditions at the factories that make its flagship iPhone smartphone and iPad tablets.

Apple responded by probing the factories; with only today a statement from Apple saying that it has asked the Fair Labor Association, a third-party inspectorate, to look into its factories abroad.

Apple and Google aside, Amazon.com reached fourth place at 8.192, less than one percentage point away from its online cloud-storage rival.

Meanwhile, though Facebook is familiar to billions of people, with over 850 million users registered with the social network at the time of its initial public offering filing, did not appear on the list at all. “People don’t currently think of Facebook as a company,” Harris Interactive vice president Robert Fronk told Reuters.

But the figures appear to stop in the mid-80 mark. While Apple reached the highest score of any other company during this survey in its 13 years of running, many companies are suffering from bruised reputations.

The research group explained:

“An RQ score of 80 or above signifies a company with an “excellent reputation.” Since first measured in 2000, Apple has shown steady improvement, earning an elite score of 85.62 this year, the highest RQ score ever achieved by any company in the 13 years of the RQ study.

Reflecting the negative mood of consumers, this year only eight companies earn such scores. This is a 50% decrease from 2011, when 16 companies earned this privileged status.”

Related:

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Zack Whittaker, a criminologist who studied at the University of Kent, Canterbury, is a journalist, writer and broadcaster.

Disclosure

Zack Whittaker

I worked briefly with Microsoft UK in 2006 but no longer have any connection with the company. Regardless, I remain impartial and unbiased in my views.

I don't hold any stock or shares, investments or industrial secrets in any company, but have signed confidentiality agreements with a number of UK and U.S. organisations, whose names I am not at liberty to disclose.

I was involved with Kent Union, the University of Kent's student union, undertaking voluntary, non-salaried, elected positions between early 2009 and mid-2010.

No other company, body, government department, non-governmental organisation or third sector organisation employs me or pays me a salary in any capacity whatsoever.

As a freelance journalist, whenever expenses are given and taken by a company that is not CBS Interactive, these will be disclosed in each relevant post to ensure transparency.

I currently work with a UK law enforcement unit, but this is an entirely separate position which bears no connection to other work.

(Updated: 23rd October 2011)

Biography

Zack Whittaker

Zack Whittaker, criminologist who studied at the University of Kent, UK, is a journalist, writer and broadcaster.

After studying criminology at university, though still in his early-20's, he has already had a series unconventional work and voluntary positions. He has worked with researchers studying neurological illnesses like Tourette's syndrome (which he suffers from), has given lectures on the nature of disabilities in the public community, and occasionally ends up speaking on television and radio discussing the events of the day.

He first had academic work published at the age of 22, then still an undergraduate, and has been cited by a wide range of publications: from CNN, the Huffington Post, AllThingsDigital, The Atlantic Wire and CBS News.

16
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Apple tops reputation survey; Facebook a 'non-factor'
CowLauncher 13th Feb
Come on Zack, you guys cater to trolls and bullys as well as "fanboys"! That's your readership.
Like say "Apple's fanboy problem" ha! And claims that Apple's lawsuits will cause some sort of backlash.

Pagan jim
@James Quinn I think the backlash to any given company will come when that company manages to block the sale of items in a particular region, especially if the items are desired by a certain percentage of the population.

If Samsung would manage to block the sale of iPads in my country, I would get pissed at Samsung. I'm sure people who like Samsung products will feel the same towards Apple if the opposite happens.

I love Apple products I use them a lot (as well as MS and Linux tools). I've invested a lot in Apple and I don't want it to suffer from its actions.
0 Votes
+ -
And there is the rub.
James Quinn 13th Feb
@IAmMarty ... What if Apple estimates it could loose say a hundred million or even a billion if it allows a competitor to take its property? And if it does not allow this it could at least in the short term loose some customers? Well at this point Apple is growing. It is selling more iPhones, iPads, and even Macs than ever before so the loss of some customers vs million even billions has to be weighed. Also I as a stockholder could sue Apple and it's management if I feel Apple is NOT protecting my investment by allowing other companies to use what I consider as a stockholder my property! It has happened and will happen again bet on it.

Pagan jim
0 Votes
+ -
Not all perfect
William Farrel 13th Feb
@James Quinn
But the company lost out on its position in China, where controversy bubbled just before and after Christmas, where workers at the Foxconn plant threatened suicide.

And most consumers don't know of the lawsuits, they're not reported in the news they watch, so no surprise there.
@William Farrel ... Still Apple did finish as the highest rated ever in the history of this particular survey. So it's pretty much all good.

Pagan jim
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
@James Quinn For the record, re: Violet's piece on the "Apple fanboy problem", I completely agree with her, and frankly, am glad someone finally stood up to the minority of the Apple community that bully and troll people online.
@zwhittaker
+1000
Come on Zack, you guys cater to trolls and bullys as well as "fanboys"! That's your readership.
0 Votes
+ -
While suicide is an awful thing, anyone ever look at average suicide rates? In the US it is 11.3 people per 100,000 people.
http://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/publications/suicide-in-the-us-statistics-and-prevention/index.shtml

With Foxconn employing nearly 1m people, that means that it would be in line to have 113 suicide attempts given the rate of the US, so in having only 17 attempts per 1m people, that is quite low at a rate of only 1.7 per 100,000.

To be clear that doesn't justify 16 hour work days, or conditions harmful to the health of the workers, or any kind of child labor, but it puts the suicide rate into perspective.

Also given that those 17 attempts were over a decade, that suicide rate at Foxconn is even lower.
I wonder how such an evil privacy invading company like Google comes second... It again proves that most of the public are ignorant or half-id***ts or the data itsself is cooked...
0 Votes
+ -
What about the rest of the list?
William Farrel 13th Feb
You only have 5 of the companies on there.
0 Votes
+ -
Curious about MS? I am as well.
James Quinn 13th Feb
@William Farrel

Pagan jim
@James Quinn The end of a giant ?
0 Votes
+ -
ESPECIALLY where Microsoft placed. My guess would be near the bottom...
@gribittmep
Up from 16th last year. That is a climb of 7 spots on the list. Apple climbed 4 spots.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix