Ultrabooks: Four things that will make or break the category
Summary: If ultrabooks are going to be a huge success they will need to inspire a corporate and consumer upgrade cycle.
A week from now you may never want to hear the word "ultrabook" again. The Consumer Electronics Show will bring non-stop ultrabook chatter to the fore. And if that's not enough CeBit is likely to be ultrabook heavy too.
You know the ultrabook story by now. Intel has hatched a plan to reinvent the PC with thin, responsive, power sipping laptops. Think the MacBook Air for the Windows crowd. The reviews have been solid and ultrabooks have a lot going for them---notably a thickness of 0.8 inches and some features found in tablets.
What's unclear is how fast this ultrabook transition will occur. For instance, IHS iSuppli reckons that 43 percent of notebook shipments will be ultrabooks in 2015. In 2012, about 13 percent of notebooks will be ultrabooks. Some analysts have noted that the ultrabook could be a big chunk of shipments by the end of the year. Sterne Agee analyst Vijay Rakesh said in a research note.
Intel is making a big push with ultrabooks and working with multiple supply chain partners and Intel Capital to lower platform costs from the current ~$1000+ ASPs to a more palatable ~$800 – with CES-Computex-CeBit as launch venues. We should note prior endeavors such as the CULV and netbook platforms have been successful and so we would not be betting against it. Nonetheless, we believe the 40% ultrabook penetration for C2012 might be too high.
Also see: CNET's CES 2012 coverage
In other words, a lot of folks are clinging to this stat that 40 percent of notebooks will be ultrabooks. What will it take to get there? Here are five items that need to line up for ultrabooks to be a crazy success.
Price. Intel has 60 design wins for next-gen ultrabooks in the queue. That's a good thing given that competition will be needed to lower ultrabook prices. CNET's Brooke Crothers said:
Price may be the single most important metric for ultrabooks. Toshiba has been leading the way this year, going as low as $699 on its Portege Z835. Expect more of this in 2012. HP, for example, doesn't shy away from price competition. Its Folio 13 offers a lot for $899, including a Core i5 processor, a 128GB solid-state drive, USB 3.0, and great battery life.
Is $699 the magic price? Probably not. Perhaps $500 is the benchmark. Tablets and laptops are increasingly looking like competitors not complements. The sooner prices fall, the faster consumers will gobble up ultrabooks.
Windows 8 needs to be huge. The big driver for ultrabook sales will be Windows 8, a Microsoft release designed to meld the PC and tablet experiences. Ultrabooks with touchscreens and hybrids could appeal to the masses. But first, Windows 8 needs to capture corporate and consumer imaginations. The challenge is going to be the new Metro interface, which is snazzy but a total sea change.
Ultrabooks have to inspire consumer and corporate upgrades. Will ultrabooks be so snazzy that corporations will hand them out like candy? Probably not at first given that enterprises are still upgrading to Windows 7. On the consumer front, it's also unclear whether ultrabooks can thwart tablet momentum.
The MacBook. No matter how much you love ultrabooks, Apple created the category. Price will matter for ultrabook success largely due to Apple prices. At $800, many folks will go MacBook Air over the ultrabook assuming they can handle an 11-inch screen (I can't) starting at $999. At $1,299 for a 13-inch MacBook Air, an ultrabook at half that price is very appealing. The challenge for ultrabooks is that the PC industry is going where Apple has been---not where it's going. Apple could cut prices, cook up new designs and offer more screen variety to fend off ultrabooks.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
Will users choose Cedar Trail Netbooks over Ultras?
RE: Ultrabooks: Four things that will make or break the category
Again with the "WTF?"
Wouldn't it be nice if you explained WHAT a "Cedar Trail Netbook" is.
I'm sure I can Google it, but... seriously? Give a 'clue' when you post something please. Thanks. (I did say "please.")
RE: Ultrabooks: Four things that will make or break the category
RE: Ultrabooks: Four things that will make or break the category
RE: Ultrabooks: Four things that will make or break the category
A decade back shaving sytems had only one blade on it, now most comes with 5 blades... Apple may be bringing something like that... Five 1mm displays that can be pulled up... Mac books will probably be relegated to 1% of market share by 2015.
Highly unlikely
RE: Ultrabooks: Four things that will make or break the category
RE: Ultrabooks: Four things that will make or break the category
Ya, lets get real here.
If your talking about laptops that cost huge, and in Apples case undeservedly so, yes, Apple dominates simply due to the fact that all of their competition finds they can mass produce notebooks just as powerful for less money.
I have said it a million times; if you really need an Apple computer, or simply just really like them for any rational reason and can afford one, go ahead and get one because they make nice hardware and every Mac owner I know seems quite happy with their Mac. On the other hand don't try and justify the purchase of a Mac any flavor by trying to justify its cost or based on claims that Windows is somehow too problematic for daily use.
The facts of life are the facts of life, Macs are costly and Windows has been powering the computerized world for years without significant issues, so make your purchases with those simple plain realities in mind.
RE: Ultrabooks: Four things that will make or break the category
In comparison, I could have bought a Dell Vostro 3750 (Core i7, 4GB RAM, 500GB 7200rpm HDD) for about $1200 inc tax and shipping. In fact, for the money I paid for the MBP, I could have bought two comparable Dell laptops. With enough cash left over for another cheaper laptop or a new printer or a copy of Photoshop, or ...
Would the Dell have been as "pretty" as the MBP? No, probably not, but at least I'd have the full complement of keys on the keyboard (no delete, page-up/down keys, damn you Apple) and better, more up to date driver support than Apple provides.
Make no mistake - Apple charges a sizeable premium for its products. How else do you think they report multi-tens-of-billion dollar profits from 40% gross margins on hardware sales while the rest of the PC industry skims by on 4-8% margins?
Diou! Wrong!
RE: Ultrabooks: Four things that will make or break the category
All market studies show Apple's share of the desktop market increasing over the past decade, driven perhaps by iOS sales, but once Apple gets a foot in the door with an iOS device, it's that much easier to make an OS X sale. For 2011 stats, see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usage_share_of_operating_systems
Why so many nerds buy MacBooks
RE: Ultrabooks: Four things that will make or break the category
Right!
While the Wintel industry is going after market share with razor thin margin for profit, Apple is laughing all the way to the bank. Who cares about market share when there's not much money in it, and for us techno geeks, when quality stinks in these "ultrabooks"?
We all know that Apple's competitors are all keeping an eye on them.
What was it Microsoft used to call Apple? Research south?
It's making me sad that so few have the brains to do like Apple, powerfully push the evolution of technology forward. :(
RE: Ultrabooks: Four things that will make or break the category
Exactly. I always am amazed that more people don't figure this out.
Apple MAKES MONEY. Most OEMs don't. That's why they're doing so well. They build high quality products, stand behind them and sell them for a profit. Dell, HP and Gateway introduced the cheapo-PC, and consumers assumed that that was how computers should be. Consumers assume that it's normal to buy cheap plastic pieces of crap that break within two years ... they've done it with laptops, desktops, music players and phones for decades now. Part of what I admire about Apple (I won't say 'love', since I'm quite turned off by a lot of Apple aspects as well) is that SJ was unwilling to cheapen his own product with discounts, flash-sales and multiple models. Apple makes a few very great products, supports them for many years, and prices them accordingly.
BTW, this is also why the Thinkpad is so great. The Thinkpad has evolved slowly over its lifetime (from IBM to LN). It's not the trendiest or most attractive computer, but boy, Thinkpads LAST. And they work.
RE: Ultrabooks: Four things that will make or break the category
Don't let apple fool you. they're using the same components everyone else is. Dell laptops and Apple laptops are all made by Foxconn.
Of course you don't get it. Clearly.
RE: Ultrabooks: Four things that will make or break the category
Well, Apple doesn't use the same trackpads. (See James Kendrick's recent articles on the subject.)
Apple doesn't use the same battery technology. (Although a difference which makes no difference IS no difference. By that I mean, that might not matter in a comparison between an Apple Battery subsystem vs a PC battery subsystem if the two give equal charge durations and have the same service life. Although, I tend to think Apple's new battery tech might last longer and perform better overtime than a comparable PC system. But again, I have no experience to support that claim.)
Most PC laptops are not constructed using a aluminum unibody case. Apple unibody laptops are noted for their lightweight and case rigidity.
But do they use the same processors? Yeah. The same RAM? Yeah. Although Apple does tend to use more SSD Flash based memory than a PC laptop does, on average.
RE: Ultrabooks: Four things that will make or break the category