ICANN and the coming flood of domain names

Summary: Companies will be able to turn any word into the ending of domain names, replacing .com, etc. Will it lead to a new Internet land grab?

AdAge columnist Judy Shapiro writes that ICANN's new program, which allows any word to be used instead of .com or .org, etc, will create "one of the biggest changes on the Internet in a decade."

She writes:

With ICANNs New gTLD Program to commence January 2012, the doors will be thrown wide open and virtually any word can become a gTLD if the company or organization meets certain criteria:

-They can pony up the hefty application fee ($185,000)

-They can prove they can afford to run a gTLD year after year

-They can justify why they should own a particular word as a gTLD — e.g. a travel company is unlikely to be successful at justifying buying ".Apple" as a gTLD but they can justify buying ".travel"

...

From a marketer's perspective (and their agencies): Here's the bad news. If you're at a Fortune 300 company, it is likely your IT/ legal department will advise you to purchase multiple (possibly a dozen) gTLDs.

Now even if you manage to avoid getting hit directly with that cost (for now), you will still have to spend a hefty chuck trying to figure out what to do with these new "marketing assets."

It's far too strong to call this "One of the Biggest Changes on the Internet in a Decade." It's a way for ICANN and the registrars to milk more money from large corporations.

A domain name has very little value unless it is used in marketing campaigns -- it's the marketing that creates the value -- not the domain name.

(There is value in small numbers of high profile .com names, but that value disappears with other TLDs.)

Also, Google is favoring large brands in its search results, so it's already discounting other TLDs that belong to squatters or small businesses, in its search results. That means there's little value in terms of SEO, and the parsing of keywords in domain names, as there used to be.

But corporate legal departments always bank on the side of caution so it's understandable that they would recommend buying other TLDs to prevent competitors, and also scammers/spammers attempting to hoodwink consumers with look-alike names. But that consumer problem exists today without the new TLDs and is solvable through browser warnings.

Ms. Shapiro is helping to organize a free conference November 1, in NYC, to help brands understand the coming changes, info is here: CADNA - What is at stake?


Topics: Browser, Networking

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

5 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • RE: ICANN and the coming flood of domain names

    Hi Tom - Hi Tom <br>Thanks for this post. <br><br>IMHO it does qualify as a game changer for two important reasons. First, for marketers standard URLs are morphing into a marketing program, complicating the ever increasing marketing landscape. <br><br>Second, for consumers, the ability to recognize safe sites from harmful one will get much much tougher. <br>In the end I dont know if gTLDs are good or bad but I do sense they are a big change.

    Thanks for your good wishes at the conference and for the record there are NO vendors there with any ties to selling gTLDs the conference is a discovery conference for marketers to learn. <br><br>Judy Shapiro
    judy.shapiro@...
    • Seems superfluous to me, DNS supports subdomains for a reason. [nt]

      [nt]
      olePigeon
    • RE: ICANN and the coming flood of domain names

      @judy.shapiro@... One might argue that the price and justification factors would make maliciously intended URLs difficult to obtain.
      Imrhien
  • RE: ICANN and the coming flood of domain names

    That is interesting!
    Lots of implictions. Price is hefty, and what 'proof' would they need to secure name? Who's going to get the polo brand: the car, clothes or cologne? I bet there is going to be a split second race for that one! :-)
    EgoDust
  • RE: ICANN and the coming flood of domain names

    I'm not 100% clear on what you mean by "it's the marketing that creates the value -- not the domain name." Are you saying that by purchasing an exact-match domain and doing very little, if any, marketing to the site (other than throwing a site up, of course) that that EMD would not have SEO value?

    In my experience and based on SEOmoz's 2011 search ranking factors, EMDs still hold major weight in the SERPs:

    "Domain level keyword usage

    - Correlated data shows .22 ??? dropped from .38 (June 2010), stated as one of the biggest drops in the entire data set.
    - Survey data shows participants felt exact-match domains (EMDs) are still highly favored to other strategies in terms of impact on rankings (97.0), keyword present anywhere in domain (71.0)"

    While the data shows that opinion on EMD importance dropped from 2010 to 2011, EMDs are still viewed as a strong element.

    I'm not saying that a bunch of .books or .travel domains are suddenly going to start being search ranking powerhouses for "books" and "travel" keywords. But IMO EMDs are still up there as one of the strongest SEO strategies.

    Great post, btw. Looking forward to reading more.
    houseofcopy