ie8 fix
madison

Hardware 2.0

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes

Google Chrome OS is a game changer

By | July 8, 2009, 4:21am PDT

Late last night Google finally owned up to having an OS in the pipeline the Google Chrome Operating System. This is going to be a game changer.

We don’t have a lot of information on Chrome OS just yet, but what we do know is very interesting:

  • It’s open source
  • It’s a lightweight OS aimed at netbooks
  • It’ll be available to consumers in the second-half of 2010
  • It’ll run in x86 and ARM processors
  • The idea is for you to be on the web in seconds

Should Microsoft be threatened by this announcement? You bet.

Speed, simplicity and security are the key aspects of Google Chrome OS. We’re designing the OS to be fast and lightweight, to start up and get you onto the web in a few seconds. The user interface is minimal to stay out of your way, and most of the user experience takes place on the web. And as we did for the Google Chrome browser, we are going back to the basics and completely redesigning the underlying security architecture of the OS so that users don’t have to deal with viruses, malware and security updates. It should just work.

There’s also a clear shot in Microsoft’s direction:

We hear a lot from our users and their message is clear — computers need to get better.

While it’s clear that Google’s intention for Chrome OS is for it to be a platform for users to access web-based services (Google web-based services …), given that this OS is based on the Linux there’s no reason not to assume that the OS could be a platform for all sorts of apps. In fact, I think that Google shouldn’t be too focused on web-based services and add a sprinkling of apps too (and make sure it’s easy for users to find more).

One thing’s for sure, this is a game changer. Big style. So far, Linux and open source as a whole hasn’t had a major company giving it momentum in the consumer market. While people might not have a clue what an Ubuntu or Linux or FOSS is, people do know what Google is, and this means that for the first time, Linux represents a serious threat to Microsoft’s business.

Anther factor that makes this a game changer is that it represents an unorthodox way to make money from an OS. Microsoft’s business model is based on fostering a platform, but ultimately it has to sell each and every new OS to users. Apple ties the OS to the hardware, in effect giving the OS away for free. Google will be looking at using ad revenue to make this venture worthwhile. Microsoft is vulnerable at the lower-end of the price spectrum because the cost of the OS represents a significant chunk of the overall cost of systems. A free OS pushed by a big name like Google could quickly gather momentum, especially are more and more people find that there is indeed a life beyond Windows.

Another interesting question here is how does this move by Google affect its relationship with Apple? Scan the board of directors for both companies and you see a crossover - Google CEO Eric Schmidt. As Google takes aim at the consumer electronics market, this relationship could become strained.

Note: Arthur D. Levinson is also a director on both boards.

All that said, it is important to inject realism into the debate. Microsoft is unlikely to stand still and hand the netbook market to Google. Microsoft knows what the consequences are to its bottom line if it loses its grip on the OS market. That means that Google has a fight on its hands. Still, there’s no doubt that this will shake up the OS market, and that’s a good thing. At the very least, we’ll see some innovation.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes is an internationally published technology author who has devoted over a decade to helping users get the most from technology.

Disclosure

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes

All opinions expressed on Hardware 2.0 are those of Adrian Kingsley-Hughes. Every effort is made to ensure that the information posted is accurate. If you have any comments, queries or corrections, please contact Adrian via the email link here. Any possible conflicts of interest will be posted below. [Updated: February 23, 2010] - Adrian Kingsley-Hughes has no business relationships, affiliations, investments, or other actual/potential conflicts of interest relating to the content posted so far on this blog.

Biography

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes is an internationally published technology author who has devoted over a decade to helping users get the most from technology -- whether that be by learning to program, building a PC from a pile of parts, or helping them get the most from their new MP3 player or digital camera.

Adrian has authored/co-authored technical books on a variety of topics, ranging from programming to building and maintaining PCs. His most recent books include "Build the Ultimate Custom PC", "Beginning Programming" and "The PC Doctor's Fix It Yourself Guide". He has also written training manuals that have been used by a number of Fortune 500 companies.

Adrian also runs a popular blog under the name The PC Doctor, where he covers a range of computer-related topics -- from security to repairing and upgrading.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?
186
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

Game Changer? You Betcha
cpt_slog@... 19th Nov 2009
And the reason is security. A sub $100 unit running Chrome OS will be the
perfect way to use net net for financial transactions. Secure safe and fast. No
worms no keyoggers no ransomware no ID theft.

If the banks anounced what internet fraud is costing (us) the wheels would fall
off the net overnight. Hell at $100 Banks would be giving a netbook away free
to customers and would still be making money

The best we can do at the moment is use a Linux live cd to boot from before
performing a transaction. Ask anyone who has been a victim of online fraud if
they are happy with any other existing solution.

And with what a browser can do these days Chrome OS will be no slouch.

Using Google Chrome will help make our laptops and desktops safer. Thank
you Google for caring about the rest of us.
0 Votes
+ -
this is just another silly idea
nessrapp 8th Jul 2009
don't you understand that people want more than web-surfing on computers? be it netbook, notebook, desktop or what ever.

if google means business then it means my smartphone offers more capabilities than this so called web OS calle google chrome OS
0 Votes
+ -
Conversely
AndyCee Updated - 8th Jul 2009
A laptop without a good internet/browsing connection is quite useless. Google already offer a smartphone OS (which I've no experience with). I see no reason why they would offer fewer capabilities in their netbook OS than in Android.

All speculation at this point. No point praising or condemning the quality of a product to be released one or two years away.
0 Votes
+ -
A laptop without an internet connection is useless?
de-void-21165590650301806002836337787023 8th Jul 2009
Only if you're running ChromeOS.

My Windows based laptop is enormously useful whether it has connectivity to the internet or not! Without the internet, I can still write code, read and write email, write & read documents, project plans, etc. I can still listen to music, watch movies, play games, etc.

But that's because I don't rely on the internet being there in order to run my life.

Remember, the majority of the worlds' population exist outside the US and more developed parts of the world. For them, internet connectivity is still a luxury and broadband is a pipe-dream.
0 Votes
+ -
Very True...
Kromaethius 8th Jul 2009
Chrome isn't anything to get excited about, remember the fanfair on the browser -- same thing with this version of Linux.
Google already offers apps that handle offline
access to its web services for one thing. But
just because its a Netbook, doesn't mean it
relies on the net to funtion. I have two other
netbooks, and I use one of them offline almost
exclusively. They exist for their size and
convenience.

And what part of it runs on Linux makes you
think that it will be limited to net
functionality, what other laptops can you think
of that are limited in that way? None, and
it'll stay that way. Google isn't stupid, they
just have money they need to blow through, and
if it comes in the way of providing a credible
adversary to Microsoft products that causes MS
to finally up its game, fine. But MS has not
done anything useful in years, and charged a
lot for it, this threat may cause changes. If
nothing else, that alone makes the ChromeOS
laptop anything but useless.
0 Votes
+ -
Google's KEY GOALS are...
de-void-21165590650301806002836337787023 Updated - 9th Jul 2009
...
1) To get your eyeballs in front of their sites. That way they can sell advertizing.

2) To get your data. That way they can analyze more about your interests, activities, events, hobbies, favorite music, movies and movie stars, predelictions, etc. and target advertizing at you.

Make no mistake, advertizing is pretty much their only significant source of revenue, and that's not going to change by giving away a free OS.

Google are a corporation who have to answer to shareholders. They're going to have to receive some form of financial reward for their effort in creating and driving things like Chrome & ChromeOS. That reward will come from advertizing and/or paid-for services.

Don't fool yourself into thinking that they're doing this out of the goodness of their own hearts.
0 Votes
+ -
And to your latter points ...
de-void-21165590650301806002836337787023 9th Jul 2009
1) You state that MS hasn't done anything useful in years? Hmmm. Interesting. If that was the case then they wouldn't be selling anything. Whilst MS may not have released anything that YOU find useful/interesting, I suggest that customers of Office, Sharepoint, Exchange, Communicator Suite, Visual Studio, Expression, Silverlight, XBox (have you SEEN Natal?), Zune, SQL, Biztalk, Exchange, Hyper-V, and, of course, Windows7 & Server 2008R2 ... might, just might, disagree with you.

2) Chrome on the other hand is a stripped down Linux-based OS who's primary goal is to get your onto the web ASAP. Google need you on the web viewing sites displaying their adverts. That's how they pay their bills. They're not building ChromeOS to replace Windows - they're trying to move you, your apps and your data to the web without much (if any) local experience.

The day you opt into allowing google to own your entire experience is the day you submit yourself to something that is more borg-like than MS could ever dream of achieving.
0 Votes
+ -
Worded poorly (my bad)
AndyCee Updated - 9th Jul 2009
While I can also perform all those actions on my laptop, many of them (for me) require an internet connection at some point. If my laptop could not connect to the internet, it's usefulness would deteriorate vastly.

I think that is better wording.

What use a person will get from internet connection will vary, of course. Local horsepower leads to a better & smoother experience for many applications. Many other applications can be improved by how they interface with the network, and an OS designed for this might throw a new perspective on that. Logically one would assume that designing an OS for networking would be appropriate for devices designed for networking. Google have done a good job of this on the server side. Whether ChromeOS will be any good is a matter of speculation.
0 Votes
+ -
I have a G-1 handset which uses Android, and while it's got its share of 1st-gen bugs, I like it better than any M$FT OS I've seen other than Windows 7. So yes, I don't know why they're trying to reinvent the wheel with this "Chrome OS" when they could just fiddle a bit w/Android, and make that a highly-capable Netbook OS.

Stepping back for a second, Adrian - few people can match my utter hate and contempt for Micro$haft Products, and the fanbois who clutter this board w/their "I LURRVE MICROSOFT!!!!" Right-Wingtard gibberish. But Windows 7 RC is also an extremely capable, and more importantly lightweight , OS - if they can bring those qualities to the shrinkwrap version and keep the cost reasonable, they don't have to sweat Google's or any other competitor's OS at all. Yes, Windows 7 is that good -

::sniff! sniff!:: Why am I smelling frozen brimstone...?
0 Votes
+ -
I agree to an extent...
SimonUK 10th Jul 2009
The "Right-Wingtard gibberish" is the funniest thing I've read all year!
Can I use that? Seriously I agree with all of that part - there is very
much a MSFT Mafia here on the ZDNet boards. The bits I'm struggling
with are Windows 7 being "...that good" (It is very good, I agree,
but the benchmark was set incredibly low by Vista, anything
seems an improvement over that*) and cost. I don't believe that
Microsoft know how to not rip people off. The price of SCC (netbooks
et c.) has increased almost exponentially since Microsoft became
involved - with Samsung releasing the NC30 for $700. Wow!

*I was involved in testing before the public beta's. Like many beta
testers from that period will tell you, Vista was exciting! Genuinely
very impressive. Somehow between the first RC and RTM, Microsoft
manages to turn it into an utter POS that required two major service
packs to repair. The same happened with XP and NT - what is to stop
them making the same mistakes again?
0 Votes
+ -
Cross Your Fingers !
Jkirk3279 10th Jul 2009
" Like many beta testers from that period will tell you, Vista was exciting!
Genuinely very impressive. Somehow between the first RC and RTM,
Microsoft manages to turn it into an utter POS that required two major
service packs to repair. The same happened with XP and NT - what is to
stop them making the same mistakes again?"

Here's Hoping !
0 Votes
+ -
Not silly at all
Ben1265 8th Jul 2009
I have a desktop and a laptop (Vista). Although I have all kinds of apps on the laptop, in truth, all I do with it is go on the web and use web-based apps (Gmail, Google docs, for example).
If there was an OS that allowed me to boot my laptop and get on the web in seconds, I would give it a very serious look. Google got the right idea.
0 Votes
+ -
My Win7 laptop cold-boots in 23s
de-void-21165590650301806002836337787023 8th Jul 2009
The same laptop resumes from sleep in 2s.

I only need to reboot it once per month when I take the latest updates from Microsoft.

I am more than willing to sacrifice 23s or less of my life to start up a machine that I can use to surf the web. And play games. And write code. And prepare my accounts, expenses, etc. And build websites. And IM my firends. And watch movies. And a million other things that a stripped down OS will NOT let me do.

Whilst I think that ChromeOS may be of use in limited-function web surfing tablets/netbooks, I for one would rather blow my cash on a machine that is NOT as limited and which gives me the freedom to do what I want when I want to do it.

I can't imagine that ChromeOS will render a machine useful when I am out of range of the nearest internet connection.
0 Votes
+ -
23s
bigpicture 8th Jul 2009
You better shut it down and check for Conflikr or some
of the other mountain of malware that accumulates on
this monolithic system. You might even have a key
logger and not even know it. Ah! but then MS is going
to provide free malware tools, how nice of them.
0 Votes
+ -
Ermmmm? Whut?
de-void-21165590650301806002836337787023 9th Jul 2009
I've not run ANY anti-malware software since Vista RTM other than what already ships in the OS (Defender & MSRT) and have never ever been affected by ANY malicious software.

But then again, I don't run EXE's that I don't trust.

I don't install pirated (and subtly infected) software from my nearest torrent.

I don't agree to install "this important codec" in order to view some site's porn movies.

I leave Windows Update turned on so received the patch to prevent Conficker (and several other forms of malware) MONTHS before it broke out.

I am a geek, and periodically check what's starting up on my machine and what's running using the Sysinternals suite (http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/bb842062.aspx).

That way I can keep my machines clean and problem free and let me get on with my work/fun without worry.
0 Votes
+ -
You might have a point but...
deowll 9th Jul 2009
I suspect you just need help dealing with your feelings of hostility.
of a windoze virus. Were you expecting him to be thrilled with the experience?

Of course he has feelings of hostility towards windoze and all those that keep shoving it down peoples throats.
0 Votes
+ -
I meant that the way I said it. There is money in net bots. Once any OS gets up to 20% of the market security by obscurity is gone.

Unless an OS has a decent share of the market a lot of companies won't write software for the OS.

However most attacks aren't through viruses in this day and age. Malware has gone a long way since then and some of it is aimed at Macs.

Don't really know about Linux. Jackalopes may need to become more common before they are worth hunting.
0 Votes
+ -
According to Google ...
ron.connal@... 9th Jul 2009
... that is 21 seconds too long ... (!sic)
0 Votes
+ -
... is such an OS. Linux can be trimmed back pretty far to maximize performance and, with some careful tuning, a minimal XP, Vista,or Windows 7 implementation can come very close.

With a few simple changes, I can boot my laptop to a Windows 7 desktop in 50 seconds. From hibernate, I can reduce it to 25 seconds, and from sleep, I can reduce it to 5 seconds. With an SSD, I am sure that all three of those numbers can be redsuced dramtically.

The problem is that people want the "pretty graphics" without the performance hit.

Maybe ChromeOS can do it on a netbook platform but to expect Google to displace Windows on the desktop or laptop (especially in a business setting), is just silly.
0 Votes
+ -
things you should never say
martin23 8th Jul 2009
Predicting on day one the google OS is just a another silly idea could be one of those things to look back on and think got that a little wrong.

I can see no need for more than 5 mainframe computers
We expect there will be a need for 12,000 micro computers.

I'd bet Googles announcement could have a radical effect as you have to assume their plan is not just to stop at netbooks and the O/S will be out earlier than the second part of 2010. However Linux distro's could be the first to disappear as clearly Chrome OS is going to take their market first.
0 Votes
+ -
You do realize that....
storm14k 8th Jul 2009
Chrome OS is a Linux distro right?

I'll admit that Google will be able to sell more hardware with their name on it than any of the Linux distros. But you won't find too many Linux users that care. In the end it means more hardware support for Linux which works for all Linux distros and more cross platform applications. Nobody cares which distro is on the machines that are selling.
0 Votes
+ -
Not all unix systems are the same
martin23 8th Jul 2009
While Chrome may be a another version of linux its unlikley to have the rough edges that still plague most existing products. So do I know Chrome is another Linux variant yes but that does not mean they will go to market in the same way.

The problems with most Linux distro's is they still have no real income model. Chrome is unlikley to have the same issues.

You also have to guess if its release is not going to be until 2010 they will do quite a bit of work to it so that people do care which distro they use.

0 Votes
+ -
...and people use every one of them. I personally think Ubuntu is the cleanest. Others feel SuSE is the cleanest. Others think Fedora is the cleanest...and so on. Do you see the picture. Yes I believe Chrome OS will probably take over on the netbook circuit because its all a part of a bigger plan and OEM's will enjoy riding off the Google name. However you aren't going to see any Linux distros disappear. They don't need to be distributed on hardware to survive. They only need the support that will be generated via Chrome OS on hardware and being used to access websites. I doubt chrome is going to be as full featured as the average Linux distro which I don't find to have any more rough edges than Windows. But if it is somehow cleaner than more power to them and I look forward to what becomes of all of this.
0 Votes
+ -
I believe you miss the point...
donw1234 9th Jul 2009
Chrome OS will attract new Linux users. Existing linux users may or may not migrate to it over time.

Chrome OS will certainly come with a local web server so browser based apps can be run when offline as well as online. That includes Google Office apps on a machine that costs less than Microsoft Office.
0 Votes
+ -
Maybe a public stunt b4 quarterly earning report
LBiege Updated - 8th Jul 2009
How is a dumb-down OS a game changer? Ain't there a whole bunch of graduate school research OSes having the same kinda claim of better security, architecture, efficiency and what not? Come on now, do some serious journalism please.
0 Votes
+ -
wtf are you talking about
onepersonsopinion@... 10th Jul 2009
"dumb-down OS"???

"dumb-down OS"???

do you even know what the hell you are talking about? do you know about the "whole bunch of graduate school research OSes" that are out there? cause i dont think you do. just because you have no idea about any research that has been going on...without your help...for the last 20 years doesnt mean you know whether this is good journalism or not.

"dumb-down OS" HAH! its ok that non technical people, and people who dont read about ANY research contribute ideas...but why do so many of them get into management!?! because its easy to cheat and lie your way into management thats why
0 Votes
+ -
C'mon Adrian, this is just marketing and is CERTAINLY not a game changer
de-void-21165590650301806002836337787023 8th Jul 2009
You said:
1) It?s open source
2) It?s a lightweight OS aimed at netbooks
3) It?ll be available to consumers in the second-half of 2010
4) It?ll run in x86 and ARM processors
5) The idea is for you to be on the web in seconds.

In response:
1) Big wahoo. How many OSS distro's of Linux are there?
2) Lightweight OS aimed at netbooks? What, like the lightweight Linux distro's installed on netbooks who had their collective asses handed to them by an 8 year old, outdated, closed-source, commercial OS?
3) Available to customers in 2010? Believe it when I see it. What other piece of client software (of significant size and complexity) have Google successfully launched and driven forward? None.
4) Whoopdedoo. x86 and ARM. Wow. That's groundbreaking. Not. Linux, WinCE and others have been able to do that since the early mid '90's.
5) I can cold boot my Win7 box in 25s. It resumes from sleep in 2s. I'd rather wait a few seconds for my computer to wake up and have a full raft of features at my disposal than wait about the same amount of time for a limited, unfamiliar OS to startup with which I can only surf the web.

C'mon Adrian. I expected you at least to view this "news" with a little more healthy scepticism.
0 Votes
+ -
Adrian Lost and Bought Into It...
Kromaethius 8th Jul 2009
I agree, Adrian locst his objectivity. Maybe his Windows 7 locked up or froze this morning and he's venting it out against Microsoft or something.

I remember Chrome the Browser was also the stinking talk of the town and how quickly that died out as well. I predict against the hyperbole about Google's Linux Distro will do about the same.
0 Votes
+ -
I read Adrian's articles often and have come to a conlusion that he is kind of anti-MS. So his articles are of little use to me.
0 Votes
+ -
I disagree. I think Jason often presents well considered arguments
de-void-21165590650301806002836337787023 9th Jul 2009
He voices is disapproval when MS or soemone else screws up. He generally provides more of an even-keeled, less open to marketing hype perspective of this crazy industry.

Which is why I was so surprised to see him publish this gushing blog about Google's plans to ship a stripped down Linux-based OS who's sole goal is to get you in front of a web browser (and thus, in front of Google's ad's) ASAP.

There's little that's a "game changer" here.
0 Votes
+ -
Yes, but
jragosta 8th Jul 2009
Yes, it's a silly idea, but remember that Microsoft is putting out a
massive anti-Mac TV ad campaign teaching people that buying the
cheapest computer is the right thing to do. A computer with a free OS
will be cheaper than one with Windows, so Microsoft's TV campaign is
telling people to buy Linux or Chrome systems.

Linux never had the resources to make a case for their product.
Google does. While I don't think Google will make a big impact in the
market, I'd LOVE to see Google place laptop hunter ads of their own. "I
need a computer and found this one I like. It's $799 with Windows,
but only $709 with GoogleOS that does everything I need it to do.
Guess which one I"m buying?"
0 Votes
+ -
Depends
BroGnorik 8th Jul 2009
If the $709 Google OS has only 1 gig of ram and shared graphics, and a 180 gig hard drive, while the Windows $799 machine has 4 gigs of ram and dedicated graphics card and a 640 gig hard drive, then Windows will out sell.

Every Linux PC/Laptop I have ever seen had specs much lower then the Windows counter part.

I look at specs not OS. Yes I know I can configure a good Linux computer, but when I have the prices between Linux and Windows was around $39. Windows being more. I rather pay the extra $39 for Windows.
0 Votes
+ -
Sorry ... but that's a silly argument
de-void-21165590650301806002836337787023 9th Jul 2009
MS' ad's aren't about someone choosing the cheapest PC they can find. It's about the fact that you can get a PC that meets ALL your requirements for a significant amount (several hundred dollars) less than an Apple.

Note that most PC's ship with Home Premium which costs the OEM around $100 a copy.

So chosing the identical machine for $700 with Linux vs. $800 with Windows ... which will run all my existing software, games, etc., and let me use all my hard-won skills ... THAT is a no brainer.

Sometimes free is too expensive - if I went with Linux, I'd have to dump my considerable library of apps, tools, games, etc., and would have to spend months (if not years) to learn a whole new set of skills to get me to the equivalent level of proficiency as I have under Windows. THAT would be WAY too costly for me.

If it works for you, then great, but don't think that the rest of the world is in your shoes.
The way you have been waging your tail at MS, through out the discussion, looks like you do not have any more brains than the 4 legged creature. How are you estimating the price of a Linux Laptop at 700.
Better go to some MS blog and wag your tail there. You might get some pieces thrown at you.

I use both Windows (XP) and Linux, I like both of them. But Windows is not enough for what I want to do. 2 years ago I would not have though about ditching away windows (as a client OS), but the way Ubuntu has come up, with so much ease and smoothness, I am ready to throw Windows out. I find working on Ubuntu more satisfying and relaxing,somehow.

I definitely hate the way MS tries to dominate your choices. They arm twist small software vendors to get their way and eat into their earings. None of the technology that MS boasts of is their original creation. NOT EVEN WINDOWS.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Google Chrome OS is a game changer
karnok.d@... 8th Jul 2009
I believe it when I see it (at least some screenshots).
0 Votes
+ -
Screenshots?
DannyO_0x98 8th Jul 2009
I'll believe when the game is changed.

While I am still on the fence regarding whether revolutions will be
televised, I'm pretty sure they will not be preceded by promos.

To be fair, looking at the headlines this morning, it's once again a
case where ZDNet augments company A's announcement with
assessments in terms of company B's market share. It's a narrow
viewpoint. Not every company has to have every product dominating
every market in order to succeed; some new products find heretofore
unreachable niches and achieve their targets. Sometimes the glue that
isn't too sticky has to bounce around awhile before it becomes the
post-it.

To paraphrase the philosopher Yogi, it ain't started til it's started.

0 Votes
+ -
As mentioned in Larry's topic...
Sleeper Service 8th Jul 2009
...this is surely also aimed at Apple's target demographic - a stable, quick OS that is safe and 'just works' yet on multiple hardware configurations which the buyer can choose.

I suspect Cupertino are more than a little concerned by this announcement too.
0 Votes
+ -
A stable quick OS that does very little
marks055@... 8th Jul 2009
I don't think Apple cares to much they don't compete in the netbook market anyway.
0 Votes
+ -
And do you imagine for one moment...
Sleeper Service 8th Jul 2009
...that Google wont extend this OS to 13" notebooks, a market Apple do compete in?
0 Votes
+ -
Apple has a computer now...
arminw 8th Jul 2009
That does everything this new OS will do, just much more. They are
selling it with two hardware devices, one of which is also a phone and
both of them are excellent movie players. It is highly probable that the
iPod touch will be upgraded to the capabilities of the new iPhone 3GS
minus the phone part. Both of Apple's devices are essentially computers
that can be put into a pocket and are instantly ready.
0 Votes
+ -
And it costs twice as much.
Sleeper Service 8th Jul 2009
I think you missed the point.
0 Votes
+ -
No....
Jkirk3279 10th Jul 2009
"I suspect Cupertino are more than a little concerned by this announcement
too."


"Those who are not against us are for us".

Look at it this way. If Google Chrome OS can hurt M$, Apple wins.

It's like having a 900 pound gorilla in the room. You're throwing him bananas
to keep him quiet, and waving a broom at him while desperately wishing for a
shotgun.

Then somebody comes running up with a firehose and starts blasting the
gorilla with it.

Sure, you'll get hit with some spray, but the gorilla is taking the water jet right
in the face.

And now he'll be too busy to bother you.

If you're lucky, the gorilla will back off and leave you alone. If you're REALLY
lucky, he'll try to grab the firehose and end up drowning himself.
0 Votes
+ -
I believe it will look a lot like the shot in the link, except that the Firefox icon on the Mac-like tool bar will be a Chrome Icon.

If you have never tried out this Linux variant you should give it a go. Exceptionally smooth and a great UI.

http://www.thinkgos.com/gos/index.html
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Google Chrome OS is a game changer
handydan918@... 8th Jul 2009
Spot on, Adrian. This is going to change everything.
Inevitably, "Game on!" leads to "Game over!"
This IS going to be fun to watch....

No single initiative will take Microsoft down. It will be more like death by ten-thousand flea bytes.

wink
0 Votes
+ -
Mistake (Linux can't run apps?)
eschmenk 8th Jul 2009
I think you made a mistake. You said "given that this OS is based on the Linux there?s no reason to assume that the OS could be a platform for all sorts of apps." Did you mean "...no reason to assume that the OS could NOT be a platform..." or are you saying that Linux can't run all sorts of apps?
0 Votes
+ -
Not many Linux apps to run...
NameRedacted 8th Jul 2009
There aren't that many apps to run on Linux. TuboTax? No. iTunes? No. And for business, there are fewer still. QuickBooks? No. Dreamweaver? No. Photoshop? No. Get the picture?
0 Votes
+ -
i don't even run linux,
lostarchitect 8th Jul 2009
but I know that there are substitutes for most if not all of those programs? are they as good? i don't know, but they DO exist.
0 Votes
+ -
In some cases yes; for others, no.
NameRedacted 8th Jul 2009
There is no viable substitute for iTunes with respect to use with an iPod. Moreoaver, people don't want substitutes, they the real article that they already know how to use. Try telling a web designer that he can't use Dreamweaver but he can use Geany and let me know what he says.

That's why the uptake on Linux to date is insignificant. It is great for computer hobbyists or for those applications where Linux can work well (e.g., in specific server applications). Otherwise, it's a nonstarter.
0 Votes
+ -
Why call them alternatives...
storm14k 8th Jul 2009
...well first you completely misread what Adrian was trying to say along with the first poster. He was saying theres no reason they CAN'T concentrate on desktop apps since this is Linux and it CAN run them.

Second I hate when folk go to talking about "alternatives". The Linux and cross platform apps are apps just like any other app. Some people have actually used these apps without ever using some of the ones you describe. For instance I have never bought Photoshop. I used it on a lab computer in college...later found that the Gimp did what I needed it to and never looked back. I never used TurboTax or QuickBooks...I did taxes online and used other apps to manage accounting.

They all get the job done whether they are considered "alternative" or not. I can say that I have found alot more apps to run on Linux than I had for Windows.
0 Votes
+ -
Game Changer? You Betcha
cpt_slog@... 19th Nov 2009
And the reason is security. A sub $100 unit running Chrome OS will be the
perfect way to use net net for financial transactions. Secure safe and fast. No
worms no keyoggers no ransomware no ID theft.

If the banks anounced what internet fraud is costing (us) the wheels would fall
off the net overnight. Hell at $100 Banks would be giving a netbook away free
to customers and would still be making money

The best we can do at the moment is use a Linux live cd to boot from before
performing a transaction. Ask anyone who has been a victim of online fraud if
they are happy with any other existing solution.

And with what a browser can do these days Chrome OS will be no slouch.

Using Google Chrome will help make our laptops and desktops safer. Thank
you Google for caring about the rest of us.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
Click Here
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix