Samsung admits not doing well in tablet market, should stop requiring data contracts
Summary: Samsung makes some excellent Android hardware, but can't seem to get a focused tablet strategy out to consumers. They should also stop requiring high cost, low cap data for their cellular radio models.
Samsung is in Barcelona for Mobile World Congress, of course, and as reported by CNET, a product strategy executive, Hankil Yoon, stated, "Honestly, we're not doing very well in the tablet market." That isn't surprising given strategies such as announcing a $500 7.7 inch Android tablet that also requires at least a $30 monthly fee for two years, total cost for the tablet and service is $1,220. Apple gets it right by selling tablets with no contract obligation and an option for monthly data access when the customer needs it.
When Amazon and Barnes & Noble launched low cost Android tablets I thought other Android tablet manufacturers would take notice, but it seems that is still not the case. I have a 3G iPad, but looking at my usage over the past year I see I only used the 3G data for 5 of the 12 months. It was great to turn on the data plan for heavy travel months and then use tethering or just WiFi for other months of the year.
Samsung makes some excellent Android tablets and after using the Galaxy Tab 8.9 and 10.1 for a couple of months while I served as the tech editor for a book I came to enjoy the hardware. However, Samsung and other Android tablet manufacturers need to stop requiring costly data contracts to use their 3G tablets. You can pick up WiFi only models, but sometimes you do need the 3G data access as well. Samsung also may want to try to focus on just a couple of sizes rather than overwhelming consumers with a tablet at every inch increment from 5.5 to 10 inches. There has got to be a couple of sweet spots for consumers and Samsung should try to find that out.
BTW, if you pick up that new Samsung Tab 7.7 on Verizon you will go through that $30 2G monthly allotment in no time flat with a fast LTE connection so your subscription costs could easily double with heavier usage.
Related coverage
- CNET article covering Samsung statement on tablets
- Samsung's Galaxy Tab 7.7 coming to Verizon March 1st: $499
- Amazon Kindle Fire vs. B&N Nook Tablet: Is there a clear winner? (review)
- MWC: Android’s biggest competitor is Android
- CNET at MWC
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
That isn't even the biggest problem
Their problem is, they don't know their target audience.
Admitting they copy?
Some
Apple and Samsung are the only two to do this...
The OS doesn't really resemble iOS at all so I don't see that as an issue.
As for Touchwiz, the colors and theme resemble iOS but the functionality of the system does not.
So you admit they copied? Thanks that made my day:)
Pagan jim
Not everybody is a brand fanatic
Yes, some...
As for Samsung, outside of their displays, I am not a fan of their products and I much prefer LG, Sony, HTC, and Motorola to their offerings.
Crud, my wife has a Galaxy Tab 7 Plus and the only reason we bought that was because, they relented and added the SD Card slot.
As for the Tablet sales, the I pad isn't matching the iPhone either... Android Tablets made up 40% of the tablet sales last year and word is that Sony and Asus have the lions share of the 10" tablets.
As for the tablets, the Fire shows that it isn't Android that is the problem, it is the price that people are willing to spend on these tablets.
Agreed Jim...
The way I see it, the fanatics and the tech-pros makes up about 30% buying Android phones, while the rest are your everyday consumer that haven't a clue about OS version, brands, features etc they have. They're getting a cheap two-for-one deal, that's all that matter.
It's totally flipped with tablets. 80% buying Android tablets now are most likely the faithful and your tech-pro users. With the many variations, sizes, prices out there, you would think the "large" Android community would be buying these things like candy compared to the single iPad. Many are cheaper than the iPad.
It's clear that the gen consumer should be the main target for these tablet manufacturer's, not the small Android fanatics. Just look at Amazon and how fast they sold a few million Kindle Fires vs for instance Samsung who mainly targets the Android fanatics with the galaxy by focusing mainly on beefy specs and features that doesn't resonate with the gen consumer. Same goes for Google with their frequent OS releases, Honeycomb, ICS, Jellybean.....
I suspect they do know their target audience...
Their target audience is likely the non-IT savvy user, who doesn't want to be bothered with SD cards and will buy expensive cables/peripherals without much thought (the kind that buy $79.99 Monster HDMI cables at BestBuy). This audience far outnumbers all the hardcore Android users who root, sideload and customize non-stop.
They don't care about the hardcore user. Why should they, what are they going to switch to, Apple? Windows 8? That would be blasphemous. So, they'll drop the SD card slot to cut their component costs and maybe increase their profit, they'll lock you into proprietary connectors (but unlike iOS users, you won't have an infinite number of 3rd parties cranking out cables and peripherals, keeping price in check) so you seriously have to consider switching to a Moto tablet/phone the next time around.
So apparently...
Read the article.....
No that isn't true
You know, out of all the tablets I tried, the Sony is surprisingly the one I like the most... I say this because, they deliver many of those features, add a better display than any tablet in the USA, include a universal remote that is worth several hundred alone, and include PS support as well as controller support.
Samsung MUST change...
Now, back to the subject:
I love Galaxy! But... it is not enough to compete with Xoom, Eepad or Ipad. Theres a lack of features (again this thing) that is at least annoying. =P
Which features ...
Review: Samsung
<a href="http://www.androidcomplex.com">android phone</a>
Apple limits what you can do....
The Windows 8 Armstrong tablets seem like they will also be too restrictive!
Why is the demise of the PC imminent?
First they are all PC's. They are all very personal and they
Pagan jim
Tablets vs phones
It also shows that Samsung and the other tablet OEMs seem to have a very hard time matching Apple iPad price points with comparable hardware--they almost always seem to have smaller screens, require the subscription or they are sold at cost/loss (Playbook, Kindle, Nook)
Since the OEMs clearly have a very difficult time matching Apple's supply chain, component sourcing, you'd think they would simplify their product line-ups, but that doesn't seem to be happening.
the market will sort it out
Fighting with Apple on price is not going to work. People are already tired of paying for various carrier services. If you already have an smartphone data subscription you are unlikely to want more of the same.
One of the greatest selling points of the iPad has been it's unbundling from any carrier. Now, with the successful experiment Apple did with iPhone 4S (making it world phone and not tied to particular carrier) they could just make one iPad model -- with WiFi and 3G (or 4G if there are sufficiently mature chips now) and be done with it. With no subsidy of any kind. The sheer number of sold iPads will force any carrier to support it anyway.
how right you are!
Just put W8 on them and they'll sell them as fast as they can make them.