ie8 fix
madison

Networking

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols

Google Chrome Web browser kicks rump, takes names

By | September 2, 2011, 11:43am PDT

Summary: Internet Explorer is still the number one Web browser, but Chrome is continuing to grow at both it and Firefox’s expense.

Internet Explorer (IE) 9 is probably the best Web browser Microsoft ever shipped. Unfortunately for Microsoft fans, it’s too little, too late. While Firefox has fallen into the doldrums, Google’s Chrome Web browser is slowly, but surely becoming the most popular Web browser of all.

According to Net Applications, Chrome, which just turned three years old, is now up to 15.5% of the market in August 2011. Internet Explorer market share continued its long decline and hit a new low of 55.3 percent from last month’s 56 percent. Firefox continued its decline as well and hit 22.6 percent. Apple’s Safari browser stayed steady at 4.64 percent. The other Web smaller Web browsers also stayed static.

I strongly suspect that Chrome is going to continue to catch up with IE and Firefox and eventually surpass them both. By year’s end, I think Chrome will pass Firefox. It will take until late 2012 for Chrome to surpass IE, but I can see it happening.

If you look beyond the U.S., Chrome is already well on its way. Statcounter had Chrome exceeding 20% of the worldwide Internet browser market in June. Statcounter’s numbers already places Chrome ahead of Firefox in some areas of the world.

Royal Pingdom’s analysis of Web brower use shows Chrome doing even better in some regions. In South America, Chrome has already left Firefox eating its dust with 33.2% of the market. In some countries, such as Argentina, Chile, Colombia and Uruguay, Chrome is even ahead of IE already the number one Web browser.

Why is Chrome being so successful? Well, first Chrome is just a great Web browser. It’s screamingly fast and extremely secure. You can also run it on any PC platform. So, if you have a Mac at home and a Windows PC at the office, you can use the same familiar program.

Another plus for Chrome is that, in part because of Google’s support for the Chrome operating system and Chromebooks, there’s an application eco-system developing around Chrome applications. Yes, at this point, many Chrome “Apps” are really just fancy Web-site links, but real applications are coming.

In addition, Chrome now has off-line Google applications. These will become available to other HTML-5 enabled Web browsers, but they’re first being made available on Chrome. I expect this to have the effect of making Chrome even more attractive to users in the short run.

In the long run, as everyone incorporates real HTML-5 compatibility in their browsers, this won’t matter so much. In the long run, though, I also expect most people to be using Chrome for their Web browser both on their PCs and on their Android smartphones and tablets.

Related Stories:

Firefox 6: A Firefox too far? (Review)

Chromebooks Live!

Google adds offline mode to Gmail, Calendar, Docs apps

More Google Web Browser goodness: Chrome 12

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols, aka sjvn, has been writing about technology and the business of technology since CP/M-80 was the cutting edge, PC operating system

Disclosure

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols is a freelance writer. He does not own stocks or other investments in any technology company.

Biography

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols, aka sjvn, has been writing about technology and the business of technology since CP/M-80 was the cutting edge, PC operating system; 300bps was a fast Internet connection; WordStar was the state of the art word processor; and we liked it.

His work has been published in everything from highly technical publications (IEEE Computer, ACM NetWorker, Byte) to business publications (eWEEK, InformationWeek, ZDNet) to popular technology (Computer Shopper, PC Magazine, PC World) to the mainstream press (Washington Post, San Francisco Chronicle, BusinessWeek).

61
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

Benched42, been through this before.
Joe.Smetona Updated - 6th Sep
@Benched 42 .. The number of published infections are from analysis by Kapersky Labs. That's why nothing was reported at ZDNet. Like you illustrated, people don't know that they are infected and that suits MS and ZDNet very well. They are just happy to ignore the whole mess. After all, the world can use a couple billion more spam emails. This is an absolutely excellent lesson for the smartphone manufacturers and carriers. This is what is in store for you if you start handling MS smartphones.

Anyway, this is a professional program and is changing rapidly to bypass patches and AV programs. Who really knows if it can be prevented or removed. You certainly won't get any answers or testing from tight lipped ZDNet that hasn't even mentioned it after 4.5 million Windows infections in the first three months of 2011.
Chrome is great but IE10 will be great too and an integral part of Windows 8. Do you think there will be a chrome tile on Windows 8? ...............
@jatbains
...then MS' lawyers will find themselves back in antitrust court, and should; likewise if MS tried to prevent users from changing the default browser or otherwise interfered with the operation of the user's chosen browser (it might even result in a contempt of court citation). IE has been an "integral" (meaning non-removable) part of Windows for a good 13 years now, but that doesn't stop Windows users from using IE only for downloading the browser they really want and in conjunction with Windows Update.
@John L. Ries
Yes IE10 will be good. But do you think that Google will stop now and let MS do better web browser?

Gee, and when IE10 will come out, guess what? Google will have whole year to implement everything fancy from IE10, and put even more into Google Chrome.

The same goes for Firefox.

MS can not win this race for long time. Simply Mozilla and Google can deliver quicker.
0 Votes
+ -
@John L. Ries

This is so funny when I see people calling antitrust on Microsoft if they even try to pull off 1% of what Google and Apples has done for years in their products.

Let me ask you something John, doesnt Google use all its advertising power to promote Chrome? Even on other people pages without their consent, Adwords, where Chrome ads show?

How about this. If you happen to log into www.google.com using Explorer, specially with IE6 a big heavy advertisement appears to download Chrome. How is that for an antitrust case? Google controls search and they are pushing Chrome on it very hard. I never saw an ad there to download Opera, or Safari or even Explorer, only Chrome. So let me ask you again? Why do you think Microsoft doesnt have the right to do the same with Windows?

Its so funny when people call antitrust and as far as I know you cannot install Explorer, or Firefox or any other Google product on a Chrome OS laptop. At least Microsoft lets you install on Windows everything you want. If you want to call lawyers I think they should really look into what Google and Apple has being doing with their platforms, where they are for sure not letting Microsoft in either but Microsoft has to play nice with all competitors. Example, Youtube doesnt give completely access to their APIs on Windows Phone but they do to Android. You must be very naive if you think Google is giving the same access to their products to Microsoft like Microsoft is letting Google to do.

Why dont they let Microsoft AdCenter put ads on Adwords? Of course they will never do this. You can blame and say Windows is a monopoly which is far from true, and with this lame excuse you could affirm Microsoft must allow Chrome to be run in Windows. If this is true you could say Android is already a monopoly in phones as well and even so Google doesnt allow access to their services to other companies like they do it for their own apps, and as far as I know Google is also the default search engine in Android, its not like they let you choose on setup from Yahoo, Bing or Google.
So if we want to scream antitrust about choice I think Microsoft is the most open company right now regarding choice as opposed to Apple and Google where they only want to push their own services and products. And im using Chrome right now, so its not an anti Google comment, but fair is fair and Microsoft has the same right to promote IE on their services and platforms just like Google and Apple do on theirs since years.
@weiterer

Google's products often suggest I use another browser when I'm using Midori, leading me to the following page, which recommends a modern browser such as IE 7/8/9, Firefox, or Safari.
https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/D3EWUlisO0DQ7UsVo3e2Wg?feat=directlink
0 Votes
+ -
Exactly, IE cannot be removed.
Joe.Smetona Updated - 5th Sep
@John L. Ries ... I guess my question is why not? IE doesn't provide anything magical due to having a pipeline into the OS. Certainly nothing greater than Firefox or Chrome which are just add-on applications, easy to install, easy to remove. Maybe it's doing somethng when you are not using it. There has to be a reason for MS to try and buy Yahoo for 44.3 Billion. They want the Google Gold and in some ways are better positioned to get it since they can design their closed source browser and OS to be a data vacuum. What better machine to gather data than an OS? That even trumps Google.
0 Votes
+ -
Is IE-10 going to run on Win 7?
Joe.Smetona 5th Sep
@jatbains ... Really, how many IE's will it take to kill out the Win 7 folks?
You're missing a rather big point...it's easy to grow when you have no market share. Likewise, it's easy to shrink when you're the top dog. Mainly because there's only one direction to go.
0 Votes
+ -
You're also missing a point
GoPower 2nd Sep
While not mentioned in this article, IE had market share simply because it came with Windows. There are still folks that don't know there are alternatives. Chrome, Firefox, Safari and any others require people to seek it out, download it, and install it. Big difference.
@Aerowind
@GoPower
You too missed the point. Aerowind is just saying about how Google seems gaining momentum. You are saying how MS got to that position. Big difference.
0 Votes
+ -
What a tool
itpro_z 2nd Sep
Chrome has reached 15% market share, while IE still holds better than 55%, yet you boldly proclaim that Chrome is "becoming the most popular web browser of all". I found no reason to continue reading after that bit of nonsense in your first paragraph.
0 Votes
+ -
You mean that IE is down to 55%?
John L. Ries 2nd Sep
@itpro_z
And neither the Internet, nor the commercial software industry have collapsed?

This is good news.
Always amusing how some IT folks fall in love with something and refuse to open their eyes. Remember all the Netware folks?

@itpro_z
0 Votes
+ -
Refuse to open my eyes?
itpro_z 3rd Sep
@GoPower, I use IE9, FF, and Opera, so my eyes are wide open. I refuse to allow spyware on my systems, so I reject Google's crapware in all forms, whether it be their toolbar that breaks applications, their Desktop that scans every file on my harddrive and uploads the data to the Overlord, or their browser that not only lacks basic features but tracks all of my internet usage for Google's benefit. I have tried Google's search engine, but find it lacking in results, other than those of the malicious variety which it delivers in abundance. Sell your soul to the Google if you wish, but don't expect me to follow.
@itpro_z
Wow. Just wow. I guess we have to add "ABGer" to the list of ZDNet abbreviations. I'll tell you what -- just download and install Chromium and you can test out "Chrome" to know and understand what's going on in IT without having your brain scanned by Google while you sleep.
0 Votes
+ -
daengbo, you appear to have a problem with reading comprehension. What is there about "I reject Google's crapware in all forms" that is so hard to understand? I absolutely will not download Chrome, as I am well aware of its purpose: To collect data on one's web browsing habits for Google. That is its only purpose. My data, and my browsing habits, are my own, and I do not choose to share either with Google.

I also take exception to Google's habits of forcing it onto PCs without the users knowledge. I am constantly running into it on both personal and work PCs, and not even once have I had the user tell me that they installed it. In virtually every case, the user has no idea how it got on their system. Why is that? Is Google forcing it on users? It sure seems so to me.

I do know what is going on in IT, as I am an IT professional with many years of experience. Perhaps you are comfortable with Google's practices, or perhaps you are just naive or oblivious to their history. Either way, I really don't care. I have watched as Google installed software (Google Desktop) that not only slowed even fast computers to a crawl but also was proven to scan the user's hard drive and send data, including passwords and financial info, back to Google. I have been forced to remove Google Toolbar from numerous systems, as it not only breaks apps but also steals data, even when disabled. I have watched as Google at first lied about, then was forced to admit that it was monitoring wifi connections and once again stealing data. I have observed as China has had their way with Google's supposedly secure servers, stealing at will Google's vast collection of data on nearly everyone.

Chrome may very well be a decent browser, but it is not the only one. IE9 is now an excellent choice, and offers features that Chrome does not. FF has also matured of late, and also offers a variety of features that Chrome does not. I have also used Opera, and find it to be a compelling choice as well. None of the above track and steal my habits and data like Chrome, in fact they have taken steps to protect my privacy.

So, if you wish to lable me ABG, then I am perfectly OK with that. Perhaps you should badge yourself NBG while you are at it.
0 Votes
+ -
@itpro_z

"is slowly, but surely becoming the most popular Web browser of all."

He is saying the rate at which it is gaining market share is growing faster than either IE or FF, not that it is the market leader right now.
@digital838 Something without any market share will show a rapid growth. Chrome may have a high version number, but it is still a beta quality product that has only being out for a short period of time.

It is fast .... but it is also buggy ... and a privacy rapist.
0 Votes
+ -
@itpro_z
Let me ask you this. Suppose Windows shipped with Chrome as a default browser for the past 10 years and IE was a third party browser people had to download and install. What would be the market share of IE after 10 years? Competing with other third party browsers, I'd say about 2%...
0 Votes
+ -
Google Haters Anonymous.
Joe.Smetona Updated - 5th Sep
@itpro_z ... I get a hoot out of these rants about Google privacy problems. Really, what do you really know about it? What proof do you personally have? I'll tell you, what you hear and don't question. It's called Propaganda and virtually everyone at ZDNet is a victim of it.

Just to set the record straight, Microsoft is in competition with Google, Apple and Linux. They are doing everything in their power to trash these companies through their puppet publications and propaganda threaded articles.

If you don't believe me, take the TDL-4 rootkit MBR botnet that infected 4.5 million Windows users in the first three months of 2011. Not a wimper from your puppy watchdog ZDNet. Nothing.

Now take a look at 72,000 articles on the web about it. Did you know about TDL-4? Did any of the readers here know about it? It's called Propaganda by omission.

Google has a public policy they adhere to. Write an email about a red Corvette, and you'll see 4 Corvette parts ads appear. Not so bad, is it?

It's all done by robots, no human is reading your email and only words that are appropriate are used, no medical terms, etc. Really, What in the world do you think Microsoft, Hotmail, Yahoo, or other emails are doing with your information? Answer: You have no idea. Why don't you spend your energy trying to get them to tell you exactly what they are doing?

Here's the link to the 72,000+ posts on the TDL-4 mystery Botnet:

http://www.google.ca/search?q=%22tdl4%22+%2B+%22rootkit%22&hl=en&num=10&lr=&ft=i&cr=&safe=images&tbs=

You are so infused with propaganda that you think only Google is reading your information? What does that make the other companies, saints? Microsoft tried to buy Yahoo (for online advertising) for 44.3 Billion dollars. Don't you think they are serious about online data gathering?
Do these stats indicate whether other browsers are installed? I have chrome and firefox installed on my system, but rarely use either. Also, what kind of revenue do these browsers generate? What is the impact to the bottom line of MS if Chrome surpasses it in late 2012 as you have predicted?

I keep seeing these articles of "Chrome is better than FF which is better than IE" based on some arbitrary tests and the number of downloads, but am failing to grasp why this is in the least bit important. I'm not trying to jump start the fanbois wars, but seriously, can anyone explain this? Who benefits if one browser is "champion?" Will ms stop developing browsers for their users if their market share gets surpassed? These articles are beginning to get tedious. At least when a new version came out and you reviewed it there was a point to the review... Just my 2 cents.
0 Votes
+ -
How much revenue does IE generate?
John L. Ries 2nd Sep
@tdogg219
And given that I don't have a financial stake in any browser developer (nor do most people), why should I care?
0 Votes
+ -
@tdogg219 I really have not seen anything that says there is a winning browser over any others. Chrome, IE9, Firefox are all decent browsers that are very fast and render most sites within less than a second of each other. Some tests work better for some browsers, but other tests show the opposite. I believe it is too close to call. So pick a browser based on preference: don't want to install something, use IE; want something that works with google apps, use Chrome; want some greater functionality, use Firefox; love apple, use Safari; hate all the others, use Opera.
0 Votes
+ -
@tdogg219 You asked "Who benefits if one browser is "champion?" ". I think google would have been satisfied with any browser except they wanted to be sure microsoft couldn't build in functions to disable or cripple google docs. To prevent this, they produced their own browser which they can control. Even if it doesn't become the dominant browser, it is still available to prevent microsoft (or apple) from hurting their apps, docs or other web services.
0 Votes
+ -
@tdogg219 It's important because without browser competition forcing publishers to add features and improve security, the leading browser stagnates, and we consumers lose.
MS shipped IE6 for almost 4 years without any noticeable changes. Then Mozilla released Firefox, kicking off a browser war, that produced tabbed browsing, protected memory mode, phishing filters, add-ons, themes, 3D accell, and much more.
0 Votes
+ -
@tdogg219
These statistics are not based off number of downloads. They are based off actual statistics from websites.

The winner of browser market share benefits because of the users don't generally change the default search engine, which means that ads will be delivered to your browser accordingly (chrome=adsense; firefox=whoever_pays_them_the_most).
0 Votes
+ -
Message has been deleted.
William Farrell Updated - 2nd Sep
What is missing in this survey is the OS used to surf on websites. This will give a better view of the market.
@Chriz-tian Being that this is Chrome vs Firefox vs IE, I assume this is non-mobile browsers, so it's probably mosty Windows, with a bit of MacOS.

The non-mobile market isn't really changing that much, other than MacOS slowly gaining market share and Linux staying at the same percentage it's been for the last 10 years.
I REALLY wish Google would fix Chrome so that it obeys built in safety features of Windows, and install to the Program Files directory and not the User folder.
0 Votes
+ -
@Cylon Centurion I agree. If a company that competes with Microsoft writes software for Windows, please do it well or not at all. I'm tired of having to uninstall crapware from Apple or Google that interferes with just using the computer.
@G Computer Network - Agree with you both. These are symptoms of companies that consider it beneath their vision of themselves as oh-so-cool-and-important to get down on their knees so they can face the user at eye-level, and ask them what they want.
@Cylon Centurion In a way, installing to the AppData is better. Its more secure in many ways, as it can't be modified in one user account and behave differently in other user accounts, and yet if an administrator wants to control it they can still force settings through group policy.

Windows Vista an 7 have really shaken the old philosophy of applications installing everything in the Program Files directory. There is a reason for the AppData directory!

Right now, Chrome is my favorite browser partially because of its performance and the ability to manage it through Active Directory. It gives nearly as much control through AD as IE, but with better performance and security.
0 Votes
+ -
@Cylon Centurion
It is possible to install Google Chrome for all users, doing so will install Chrome in the Program Files directory and will be available for all the users: http://www.google.com/support/chrome/bin/answer.py?answer=118663
0 Votes
+ -
@Cylon Centurion
An easy way to install Chrome in Program Files so all users can access it is to install it using Google Pack
0 Votes
+ -
What Google Pack?
wackoae 3rd Sep
@ingramproductions Didn't you read the memo? Google Pack is CANCELED.
why everybody says that google chrome is so slow .. i use it is a laser !! i love it wink
@hotelsudtirol A lot of standard websites render wrong in Chrome.
0 Votes
+ -
IE is the only sucker browser
theo_durcan 4th Sep
@wackoae
get your facts straight buddy. Chrome renders perfectly standards compliant web sites, idem Firefox, idem Safari, idem Opera.
until you get to that crap called IE.
0 Votes
+ -
Chrome doesn't have the Add-Ons.
peter_erskine@... 3rd Sep
Firefox does, chrome doesn't. So no point in using chrome.
0 Votes
+ -
@peter_erskine@... Until they are available I will stick with Firefox.
0 Votes
+ -
Wow. This is like drunk talk.
Cayble Updated - 3rd Sep
Way too early to make a prediction like Chrome will surpass IE. It takes nothing into account except the current trends with Chrome without any apparent allowance for any factors causing Chromes current climb. Lets start with the fact that newer browsers, so long as they run well, get the most attention they will ever get. Chrome is the new kid, and lets face it IE is the granddad. Joe Average doesn't even think much in terms of this particular IE in question actually being granddad #9.

And clearly Firefox has finally been relegated to the purgatory of something in between. Here is the worst part about Firefox, I know quite a few who still use FF and the situation is not great. The reason why they are using Firefox is that about 3 years ago some kook told them IE was just god awful and they should use FF in order to avoid those billions of viruses that the Apple guy warned us about. Most of these people let their "oh so knowledgeable" buddy install FF and its was largely left at that. So thats how things have been sitting for them since with this 2-3 year old FF installation running through the internet.

Personally, I always have every top rated browser installed, they are all good but sorry, IE was is and shall remain king. At least at this point.
@Cayble Firefox was actually very fast and minimalistic when it first came out. It was performing so much better that Netscape eventually used it for their Navigator browser, if I remember correctly.

Of course, that was a long time ago. Netscape's gone, and Firefox has become larger and slower.

IE took the world by storm by being the default, by deep integration into Windows, and by some nasty tricks that eventually lead to a lawsuit. Not by being a better browser.

IE6 was a very crappy browser, and a leftover from the Netscape vs Microsoft days. It wasn't until IE7 that Microsoft started paying attention to the stuff that really matters.

I think IE will keep some market share, due to being the default, and due to some businesses having it hardwired into their systems. But I don't know if it will stay a majority.
0 Votes
+ -
Quite bad analysis
deep@... Updated - 3rd Sep
Win7 is picking up and the more it picks up the higher share for IE9.
WP7 [and now with 7.5], next year will have many more millions using IE with their phones.
Chrome OS is almost offering zero support to this recent gain.
having offline Google apps also has almost zero affect.

Google is making hay while Win7 and WP7 is gainining full strength, and once they are, IE again will be a force to reckon, and now this time it will be much better than IE6 of past.

my few cents.

regards,
0 Votes
+ -
IE is only popular because of ignorance. The browser is pre-installed and people do not use anything else because they are not informed of a better browser. They also do not change over because being so used to everything they install into IE's browser.

I prefer FF over others due to Firebug and other addons that no one else can beat. Chrome comes up next due to it's security and simplicity. Then IE due to work. Safari... not even in my list, I cannot believe Apple can develop such a horrible browser out of the same Webkit that Google built Chrome from.
@Maarek

There is 100%, absolutely no doubt what so ever that the vast majority of FF installations, and most probably with Chrome installations that are happening now, they were installed on peoples laptops and desktops with the person owning the machine actually having no significant knowledge of browsers in general. They are also in the vast majority of the cases someone who was using IE without problemm....for years.

This is not speculation, its a fact.

And if you live and work outside of the IT world, you will quickly realize as I write further just how true this is.

Initial installations of a new "brand" of web browser will come by way of someone who is IT savvy, at least to some degree, doesn't have to work in the field but knows about and understands about alternative web browsers and how to find them and likes to try them out at least, others who have had problems with their current web browser may also look into a way to see if there is an alternative that may provide solutions for them. Those are the two kinds of ways people will come ON THEIR OWN to decide to install a new web browser.

The kind of people who WILL NOT DECIDE ON THEIR OWN to install a new brand of web browser are those who are not particularly web or IT savvy, don't have problems with their current browser and have no particular interest in trying out new software just for the sake of trying it. To say these kind of people would install a new brand of browser on their own, without any prompting from others is clearly B.S. For someone like this to just up and decide to install a new browser would surly be a peculiar situation and be a very very rare exception with an interesting reason behind it, that DIDN'T involve others prompting them.

And unless you have really lost touch with Joe Average public, the above person as described as; not particularly web or IT savvy, don't have problems with their current browser and have no particular interest in trying out new software just for the sake of trying it, is exactly who the vast majority of the average person on the street is. Obviously. We know this to be true.

So how are so many FF installations and Chrome installations come into existence then on Mr. & Ms. Joe Average's computers?? Easy. Somebody told them they should do it. Some wise acre who...has either had a poor experience with IE or simply is a security FREAK who just cant tolerate IE, or perhaps the few who simply hate Windows and even though they have to work with it, an alternative browser is at least a pound of flesh they can claim.

I cant even count as of a couple years ago the number of people who I have seen using Firefox and I was just shocked to see someone I know for a fact only uses their computer at work for basic office purposes and only uses their home computer for Facebook, email and looking at photos, they are not savvy and would have never even thought another browser was available, yet there it is, sitting bold as brass on the desktop, Firefox.

I ask them, I have, time and time again, thinking that someday one of them would say "IE collapsed my computer a couple times and I couldn't tolerate it anymore, I had to ask how to avoid that". It hasn't happened. Not yet after asking so many times. But the answer I do get is always the same.

And its "My cousin/brother/ boyfriend/ uncle/ neighbor/ roommate/ person in the office, told me it was better, said Internet Explorer wasn't safe. Its what they told me."

"Did you have problems before?"

"No, but I don't need them, if this helps, why not."

"But what if at some point this one lets you down? How do you yourself know its better?"

"....uhhhh....uhhhh...well, it works so I don't care..."

"I just looked at your version number, its over a year old..."

"What does that mean...?"

Thats how the conversations go, and its a really really crappy testament as to why most alternative browsers have made it as far as they have.
0 Votes
+ -
What about Active-X?
Joe.Smetona Updated - 4th Sep
@Cayble ... I want a browser that does not support Active-X so I can get extra security. Firefox and Chrome don't support Active-X.

IE is all about Active-X and the security issues related to it have been extensively documented over the years.

Maybe the 4.5 million Windows users infected with the TDL-4 MBR Rootkit botnet in the first 3 months of 2011 need to switch to Firefox or Chrome.

The ZDNet watchdog puppy must have been asleep because nothing was reported here.

http://www.google.ca/search?q=%22tdl4%22+%2B+%22rootkit%22&hl=en&num=10&lr=&ft=i&cr=&safe=images&tbs=
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
just WOW
theo_durcan Updated - 4th Sep
@Cayble
you are putting a lot of effort there defending your master company, I hope you are well paid for your efforts.
The problem, reality contradict your imaginative explanation.
Fact: IE went in a few years from 95% to minus 50% of usage. You can wildly spin about the reasons of this. But when a company, whatever is called RIM, Nokia or MS, is bleeding market share, it doesn't take a PHD to see where is the REAL problem. Hint: no, is not those "evil IT savvy people" switching everybody to FF...
0 Votes
+ -
Benched42, been through this before.
Joe.Smetona Updated - 6th Sep
@Benched 42 .. The number of published infections are from analysis by Kapersky Labs. That's why nothing was reported at ZDNet. Like you illustrated, people don't know that they are infected and that suits MS and ZDNet very well. They are just happy to ignore the whole mess. After all, the world can use a couple billion more spam emails. This is an absolutely excellent lesson for the smartphone manufacturers and carriers. This is what is in store for you if you start handling MS smartphones.

Anyway, this is a professional program and is changing rapidly to bypass patches and AV programs. Who really knows if it can be prevented or removed. You certainly won't get any answers or testing from tight lipped ZDNet that hasn't even mentioned it after 4.5 million Windows infections in the first three months of 2011.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
Click Here
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix