Tech Broiler

Jason Perlow and Scott Raymond

Retail in 2021: When clicks have buried bricks

By | November 29, 2011, 5:30am PST

Summary: Ten years from now, virtually all shopping will take place at home.

Edgewater, New Jersey.

Mindy Konsumer was in waking sleep when she heard the sound of birds tweeting. They progressively got louder, and louder and louder.

She pulled the covers over her head. “Ugh. Why did Josef set it to those horrible birds again instead of my wind chimes?”

“Bitch, deactivate the alarm. I’m up.”

YES MINDY. GOOD MORNING. IT IS MONDAY, 8:30AM, THE 29TH OF NOVEMBER, 2021. SHALL I PRIME THE ESPRESSO MAKER NOW, OR SHALL I WAIT UNTIL YOU EXIT THE SHOWER?

“Prime me my standard double right now, Bitch. I’ve got some shopping to do first.”

YES MINDY. DOUBLE ESPRESSO, DOUBLE STRENGTH WITH EXTENDED BREW TIME. ONE SPLENDA.

Mindy was always cranky in the mornings. The first time Josef brought in their first Apple Siri iHome automation system and it woke her up it really pissed her off.

She’s been calling it “Bitch” ever since. The intelligent agent could care less now, but it originally asked her if she was upset. Now it was simply routine.

And at age 50, while she was exceptionally perky and fit, Mindy wasn’t getting any younger. Or patient. God, she hated the holidays.

Josef, her husband, had already woken up about an hour earlier. She walked out of the bedroom and past his office, where he was staring at the data streaming on his 4K wall displays and was barking orders on a three way conference call with the home office in Beijing and his traders in Mumbai.

She waved to him and blew a kiss, but he seemed too engrossed in what he was doing. She continued downstairs, and headed into the kitchen, where she could hear the Philips Saeco i7000 superautomatic grinding the coffee and priming its pumps.

ESPRESSO IS READY TO PULL, MINDY.

Mindy grabbed a pre-warmed demitasse cup from the Saeco’s heater rack and put it under the coffee spout.

“Pull Bitch.”

Fifteen seconds later, a steaming hot cup of espresso was ready. “Hey bitch, how are we doing on coffee supplies?”

APPROXIMATELY EIGHT OUNCES OF FREE TRADE CITY ROAST BRAZILIAN BEANS ARE REMAINING IN THE HOPPER. THE PANTRY HAS ONE POUND OF COSTMART MEDIUM ROAST GUATEMALAN. BASED ON CURRENT CONSUMPTION RATES, NEW SUPPLIES WILL BE REQUIRED IN ONE WEEK. SHOULD I PRE-ORDER BASED ON EXISTING PREFERENCES?

“Yes Bitch. You think I’m pissed off now, wait until we run out of coffee.”

I MUST INFORM YOU BASED ON YOUR DEAL SNIPER THAT COSTMART HAS POSTED A SALE THIS WEEK ON FIVE POUND BAGS OF DARK ROAST COSTA RICAN SINGLE ESTATE BEANS. WOULD YOU LIKE THAT INSTEAD?

“Sounds good.”

YES MINDY.

Mindy takes a sip and walks into the living room. She’s wearing just her underwear. It’s a good thing they don’t have kids.

“Screen, Bitch. I need to buy some clothes for our Christmas trip to Saint Martin.”

The 80 inch 4K super-sized wall monitor came to life, and Amazon.com’s clothing portal appeared. Mindy had shopped at Amazon for clothes before, so the system was already familiar with the brands she liked.

Size isn’t a problem either, as the ultra-high-resolution Microsoft Kinect V 3D camera had taken Mindy’s precise full body metrics. The load sensor mat underneath the carpeting had also calibrated for the fact that her exercise regimen of XBOX 4K 3D kickboxing has kept her weight under control as well.

Bitch would have already told her if she was putting on the pounds anyway.

“Tee shirts, and bathing suits please.”

A virtual clothing rack appeared on the screen. Using the Kinect motion sensing and tracking interface, Mindy picked out a bunch of items, and tried them on using the augmented reality preview mode that superimposed the clothes on her body. She then added them to her basket.

Everything personalized, just the way she liked it.

THE ORDER WILL BE IN THREE SHIPMENTS, AS THREE AMAZON PARTNER VENDORS WILL BE PROCESSING IT. HERE ARE YOUR ESTIMATED DELIVERY DATES. CHECKOUT, MINDY?

“Yeah Bitch.”

PROCESSED. I’VE SAVED THE INVOICE IN YOUR INBOX.

“And send a reminder to Josef that he needs to get new tee shirts and bathing suits. His old ones are gross and have holes in them.”

PROCESSED. REMINDER SENT TO JOSEF.

It used to be that you had to go to the mall to go clothes shopping. Ten years ago, Bergen County had five huge shopping malls. It made things an utter traffic nightmare. Parking was insane, especially this time of year.

But in 2012, online shopping really began to hurt brick and mortar. Enabling technology such as smartphone and tablet apps, and then advanced user interfaces with augmented reality and biometrics eventually eliminated the need to get in the car and waste hours (and pricey gasoline) going back and forth and dealing with packed shops and long lines.

But for Mindy it wasn’t about the gas, since her plug-in electric Cadillac Voltec hybrid SUV got really good mileage. it was about the aggravation.

In 2016, Macy’s shut down their brick and mortar operations and became a catalog supplier to Amazon and other e-tailer portals. Other large retail chains, such as Sears (which returned to its catalog roots) began to do the same.

Without anchor department stores, the malls themselves had a hard time staying open.

In 2017 two of the largest shopping centers in Northern New Jersey closed down.

By 2019, nearly 80 percent of the retail space in the entire state had been vacated. Many of the smaller strip malls were bulldozed and were turned into residential zoning and parks again.

Some of it, such as the two larger malls which were fallow for several years, were re-configured into more entertainment-style complexes with “Showroom” stores for the types of items that didn’t make sense to buy or made it difficult to test out online, such as large appliances or even cars.

But they didn’t need to keep things in stock, it was all fulfilled by demand, and delivered right to your front door.

And some of the empty space was even reclaimed for urban and suburban agriculture projects. Northern New Jersey could finally call itself part of the Garden State again. Huge hydroponic greenhouses filled the land plots where other malls once stood.

Now you could get ripe Jersey Fresh tomatoes and other produce at farmers markets year-round.

Of course, a lot of consolidation occurred as well. Costco and Wal-Mart merged to become the largest brick and mortar merchant for food, consumables and durable goods — Costmart, although much of what they sold went through their own electronic portals, as well as through others such as Amazon.

Amazon itself merged with Target, which it used as local retail showrooms for large durable goods and distribution centers.

Best Buy merged with Staples, and ended up grabbing the business brand names and customer lists of every single mid-sized regional store chain you could imagine, once many of them declared Chapter 7.

Mindy finished her coffee. Her stomach started rumbling. She needed breakfast. But maybe it might be a good idea to think about what to cook for dinner.

“Bitch, what does our food inventory look like?”

MINDY, BASED ON PRODUCE AND PROTEINS IN THE REFRIGERATOR AND FREEZER, AND THE EXISTING MENU PLAN, YOU SHOULD SHOP FOR FOOD TODAY. THE SCALLIONS AND BROCCOLI IN THE FRIDGE SHOULD BE CONSUMED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE, AS SHOULD THE 1LB OF FLANK STEAK.

Ah, right. She had planned for a stir fry tonight. Every item in the fridge, freezer and pantry had an RFID tag. Bitch knew everything there was to eat, and how quickly it was being consumed. Biogas detectors in the food bins and on the refrigerator shelves could also make Mindy aware of what was going ripe. It really cut down on food waste that way.

Based on what was in inventory, It could recommend dishes to cook, or conversely, Mindy could stock up the house with food based on recipes she tagged while watching interactive TV or reading her favorite cookbooks on her Kindle Fire or her husband’s iPad.

Mindy’s supermarket trip was similar to her clothing shopping spree. Costmart uses a virtual reality store with aisles and shelves filled with virtual merchandise, including generic store items and popular brands. But Mindy never left the house to buy food.

Some items Bitch automatically filled as staples, such as lowfat milk, whole grain bread, and the organic skinless boneless chicken breast that she liked. Mindy looked at the endcaps for deals and impulse buys, and Bitch made her aware of what other of her favorite types of items were on sale, like the DNA-certified Maine Lobster which was on special that week.

If Mindy had any questions about ingredients in a particular item, Bitch could tell her right away. Anything with High Fructose Corn Syrup on it was auto-blacklisted and didn’t even show up on the shelf. Costmart entered a distribution agreement with Whole Foods back in 2016, so many of the SKUs that Mindy liked came from their database.

When her order was complete, it was sent to the local Costmart Retail Food Processing Center (RFPC). Mindy happened to opt for home delivery and pay the extra fee for the privilege, but if she wanted, she could drive down to the local RFPC and pick up her order and have it loaded into her car, as long as it was within at least a two hour time window.

Some people drove down there to pick up their orders late at night, just to avoid traffic.

Mindy was happy enough to get the food by 2PM. Delivery trucks, assisted by sophisticated GIS systems for route planning were much more efficient and timely, especially since less people were travelling the roads.

And the packaging? Far less than you had to deal with in the old days. Since all shopping was done online, the idea of complex, visually attractive boxes and bags for most types of food and durable goods no longer made any sense.

A lot of stuff ended up in flat vacuum-sealed packets or cryovac, with simple labels, and optimized for space efficiency in the fridge and freezer. That’s one good thing from NASA’s Space Shuttle and the ISS programs which translated directly to the consumer market.

Mindy looked at her watch. It was 8:54 AM. As lead project manager for an IT services firm, she had a kickoff meeting for a large consulting engagement she had to get into gear in North Korea that morning. Thank God she got all her shopping done, because it was going to be a very busy day.

Her oatmeal and shower would have to wait until after her conference call.

“Activate my secure corporate virtual desktop session in my office, Bitch. And open the conference line to Pyongyang.”

YES MINDY.

What do you think shopping will look like in 2021? Talk Back and Let Me Know.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Jason Perlow, Sr. Technology Editor at ZDNet, is a technologist with over two decades of experience integrating large heterogeneous multi-vendor computing environments in Fortune 500 companies.

Disclosure

Jason Perlow

My Full-Time Employer is IBM. I write as a freelancer for ZDNet.

Disclaimer: The postings and opinions on this blog are my own and don't necessarily represent IBM's positions, strategies or opinions.

I own no investments or direct financial instruments in the companies I write about.

Biography

Jason Perlow

Jason Perlow, Sr. Technology Editor at ZDNet is a technologist with over two decades of experience with integrating large heterogeneous multi-vendor computing environments in Fortune 500 companies. A long-time computer enthusiast starting the age of 13 with his first Apple ][ personal computer, he began his freelance writing career starting at ZD Sm@rt Reseller in 1996 and has since authored numerous guest columns for ZDNet Enterprise and Ziff-Davis Internet. Jason was previously Senior Technology Editor for Linux Magazine, where he wrote about Open Source issues from 1999 to 2008.

In his spare time, Jason is an avid amateur chef and food writer, where his work reviewing New Jersey restaurants has appeared in The New York Times. He is also the founder of the popular food web site eGullet and blogs about restaurants and cooking at OffTheBroiler.com.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?
41
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

Distraction
Bob C User 27th Dec
The use of a certain objectionable word detracted from the whole article. That one word cast such a dismal pall over the whole story that I lost the point. This future seems dreary, where mankind has sunk to the level of machines. Is that what was intended?

Also, it is amazing how many authors (think 1984, 2001 A Space Odyssey [not in any way comparing this to those works, just the title) grossly overestimate how quickly the future will arrive. There is no way this future is common by 2021, if it ever happens.
Honestly, I see what your were going for, but I stopped caring about this article and just skipped to the end after the fifth "*****".
0 Votes
+ -
If you ever used Siri
William Farrell 29th Nov
@Aerowind
you'd be calling it the same thing, too. wink
0 Votes
+ -
@Aerowind

same, except for me it was the third.
@Aerowind - Same here, it was a '*****' to read!
0 Votes
+ -
Not unless someone figures out how to monetize the "I need to touch it before I buy it" issue. I've learned my lesson the hard (aka expensive) way. Even trivial things like bath towels and water glasses can go horribly wrong when bought online without touching them beforehand.
@Vesicant I completely agree with you. There are still purchases that need to be viewed before they can be bought. I think brick and mortar stores will have to learn to adapt to a changing marketplace -- I believe most shoppers still prefer a knowledgeable salesman when needed rather than (a) a vacant sales floor where you can't find ANYONE when you need them or (b) some untrained, non product-aware lackey who hovers over you because they work on commission.
@jkumin@... The touch before buy thing is why I go to a B&M store to decide whether or not to make the purchase online. More often than not I try products out at Best Buy, then check the price at Amazon on my phone and buy it that way. B&M is dying for 2 reasons: Price competition, and convenience. People are to busy to go to a store and waste time in traffic, when the same product can be ordered online, for a lower price without any hassle.
@jkumin@...

Shame on you nekkibasara. If you go to a B&M store, you have a moral obligation to purchase there. If you buy online for less, you get less service, period, that's why it's cheaper.

I can see a point in the future where B&M will have to charge you for their time and refund it if you purchase. What other choice do they have? It costs much more to maintain stores, pay employees and then, you have to pay tax there and not online......that's a pretty stiff headwind for the B&M guys.
@jkumin@...

I agree, but we are looking 10 years into the future. Also, think of Amazon today. They make it really easy to return stuff you don't like, so if those towels come and they aren't soft enough, or the pillows don't have quite enough stuffing (a pet peeve of mine), they let you return them. Take that to the next degree and let simmer for ten years and you might find that most people will buy online.

But, your point is still a good one.
@Vesicant

Agreed, this is especially the case with things like beds & shoes.
Hey, I enjoy shopping. Seeing, touching, talking, etc.
Have some of you forgotten how pleasurable life can be.
Slow done live a little. Very little really has to be done quickly.
Where I shop and eat and get my car fixed the people working there are my friends.
The whole experience is rich and interesting. We talk, we have dialogue, we have fun.
I enjoy the world and the people in it.

Get a life.
I am NOT a consumer, I'm a human being, a citizen, etc.
Technology is good where it is appropiate but not for it's own sake.

Thanks
@AAC Tech
I agree with you but we are WWWAAAAAYYYY in the minority anymore!

People simply have an insatiable desire to get everything as cheaply as possible!
@AAC Tech

Someone else with a good point. I can easily see this exact scenario happening, and there being a strong backlash against it. Some stores remain to sell items that don't quite work online. You can easily buy a bag of coffee online, because you really don't have to feel it. Even can of Del Monte Corn is going to be the same, but there are places where we will want the human touch, and many people will reject the future described above. I might not be one of them, but I can see where others would.
0 Votes
+ -
@AAC Tech I agree with that wholeheartedly. Reading this article made me want to cry. It's one of the single most depressing concepts of the future, a world devoid of real human interaction. I like REAL LIFE shopping. I like knowing where I got a product (and by that, I don't mean the address on a shipping label). I like knowing the people who were there when I bought it. I like human interaction. As it is, I go a little bit stir-crazy if I have to sit at home all the time. I like being out in the world, and this concept scares me.

Realistically, I doubt what's going on in this article will happen that quickly, that's not just hope talking.
@AAC Tech
"I am NOT a consumer, I'm a human being, a citizen, etc.
Technology is good where it is appropiate but not for it's own sake."

Amen to that! I suspect most opposing posts to this are by people who also buy the latest & greatest of every update, upgrade, personal device, social dues clubs, etc. etc. without having the faintest idea whether it holds ANYTHING of any real use to them! Progress for the sake of progress is regression.
0 Votes
+ -
Question number ONE with all this is "Where are all the people who used to work in said 'brick and mortar' stores going to work?"

Take a good-sized store and you're talking about 50 to 100 people altogether. Take a bigger department store and you're talking of hundreds of employees, from the manager to the lowliest janitor. Repeat by however many stores there are in your town or city, multiply by cities in your state, add all other 49 states, and you'll have put more than 60% of the city's work force on the dole. What's left? Manufacturing? That's already left the continent, and gone to Asia. Mining? It's being phased out in certain parts as too dirty.

I would see it happen if the population were but a few million. We could get it done that way, with the help of a lot of robots to do the dirty and dangerous work. But we are BILLIONS!!! on this planet. So your fancy is just never going to happen, leaving aside the "need" for people to touch the actual merchandise (which is a very real need).

Food stores, from the supermarket down to the corner convenience store employ from nearly 100 people to just a family operation. You think they are not going to fight for their livelihood? Amazon will die first if it tries to expand to that level. So will your Costmart.

Your vision was fanciful but can't happen because of population pressure. They will need income and most of that comes from retail businesses, not distribution centers.
@bart001fr@...

I have to disagree. Amazon killed Borders....how many people are crying? Yes, people did lose their jobs, with an emphasis on the "DID." I am not painting this as a good thing. In fact, if you look at present trends, and push them into the future, I could see a privileged few living the life described above, and huge employed underclass.

In fact, it could be the recipe for a sort of Social Holocaust, where, after years of mass unemployment and poverty, that underclass rises up and tears down the civilization that has marginalized them.

Also, the future described is clearly a western future, as the impoverished parts of the world will have a hard time participating in such a future. Poor countries in South America, Africa and elsewhere are going to have a hard time supporting Costmart, just as they don't have Wal-mart and Costco today.
@bart001fr@...

Just because it will cause a great deal of pain for a lot of people doesn't mean it won't happen. This is no different than any other disruptive technology that has come along. Every disruptive technology kills jobs, raises overall societal efficiency, and new industries eventually absorb the glut. Long term net gain.

It does not make sense to refuse efficiency gains due to job loss. If is as absurd as tying retail employees legs together while working to increase employment.

Unfortunately, at some point in the not-too-distant future we are going to get machines that don't just replace humans at a specific task, but replace humans outright. At which point we REALLY have to re-think the idea of an economy.

"You think they are not going to fight for their livelihood?"

How would you suggest they fight? If they are to the point of fighting, they are already past the point of competing. The best they could hope to gain would be some kind of government-mandated protectionism exemplifying the worst traits of unions.
@SlithyTove & @AudeKhatru,

So you guys want to live in a Soylent Green world as was so aptly put by blkarkitect lower down. You think you'll be on the inside? Think again. Only the world's billionaires and a very few millionaires (who have 100s of millions) will will be inside. The rest of the world will be outside.

I guess this civilization is headed for a teardown and do over.

Just what happened to the Romans. (And that's only the latest civ it happened to.)

I guess future archeologists will really scratch their heads over what tore this one down.
@bart001fr

"So you guys want to live in a Soylent Green world as was so aptly put by blkarkitect lower down."

To throw that back at you: do you really want to live in Medieval times when the only way to improve standard of living was through killing people via disease and war?

Of course I don't want to live in a Soylent Green world. But making ourselves less efficient for the sake of jobs is MORE likely to put us into a Soylent Green world, not less.

There are ways out of this that don't involve paying people to dig ditches with spoons.
0 Votes
+ -
@bart001fr@... Not to mention this: http://www.intersperience.com/article_more.asp?art_id=52 So it would appear more people than you might think appreciate the higher quality service that comes with a real, physical store (B&M, as everyone else puts it).
I was in the retail auto industry for 21 years. I got out this year, the handwriting is on the wall. The internet will eliminate retail sales positions in just about every industry within the next decade. There will always be a small portion of people who want to touch and feel things before buying but it's a small minority now. The solution to this will be a centralized location where you can see and touch things but they stock nothing to keep costs down. There will be virtually no help available to you there, also keeping costs down.

God bless the internet, the single largest concentrator of wealth and destroyer of jobs ever devised by mankind. Get used to 10%+ unemployment, it's here to stay folks.
@bcanddc

Having just purchased a vehicle I have to disagree. I went to the local physical location, test drove the product and got a preliminary price. After that I went online and requested quotes on the product. I then gave the location I test drove at the opportunity to meet the lowest price quoted. They met the price and I purchased the vehicle saving $2300.
At best, I suspect there will be a even greater integration between B&M and Online. For example, my wife likes Nordstrom and will look an item at the store and purchase it online if they don't have the desired size/color. Upon receipt she can try it on at home in a natural light environment and see how it integrates with her existing wardrobe. If it doesn't meet her exacting standards, she then makes a trip to the store for return where she may also peruse the physical inventory and possibly make a purchase.

This scenario does not play as well for commodity goods or repeat purchases. However, in that case price and convenience become the arena which the B&M competes with online.

Seamless integration of physical and online presences are what the consumer desires.
I am a city dweller and enjoy the art and challenge of shopping. I can understand how many persons who do not have the opportunity or excuse to go to the Galleria in the suburbs may do more cyber-shopping in the future. I resent however the author using the word "*****" I don't like being called that or referring to anyone else like that. Totally useless article too. Practice short story writing on another blogsite....*****. Oops see how low life that sounds?
I love technology. Scratch that, I LOOOOVE technology, but this seems a bit much. When I was buying my first car, my Dad (an auto mechanic) advised me against getting the one with all the bells and whistles because if they broke, you were stuck. What happens if your whole life is bells and whistles?

What happens if there is a huge snowstorm and there is a power outage? What if Mindy lived in California and there was an earthquake? If we become too dependent on technology for even the basics of life like getting food, our life becomes a house of cards that a single errant event can severely disrupt.

As for those thrown out of work, I am reminded of the movie Soylent Green. Charleton Heston's acting aside, what I remember were the scenes where the masses literally lived in the streets, while the super rich, like Mindy, lived in luxury. In that world, even a police officer like Heston's character found Mindy's daily bath an indulgent luxury that he couldn't afford.
I think you are dead wrong and are behaving like an advertisement banner for certain companies. People are touchy-feely when it comes to purchasing many things: what the cloth feels like; how a camera feels in their hands; does that jacket fit nicely; etc., etc., etc. Will online shopping gain ground? Absolutely, as well it should. There are some things you can't even buy at a local store. But for the foreseeable future bricks still trounce clicks. Maybe Steve Jobs wanted to burn down the book publishers - most of us do not.
If you expect me to believe that in ten years all five of Paramus's malls will be gone, and the traffic with it, I think you are deluded!
Let's not forget the place of honor bestowed on immediate gratification (IG). This adds weight to the idea of online merchants merging with B&M, or at least partnering with them, to service the IG and TBB shoppers.
This article is TOTALLY CRUDE! ZdNet is supposed to be ABOVE this trash!
Absolutely NO NEED for that "B"-word, no matter HOW 'cutesy' and "kewl" you think it is. Are you TRYING to lose readers?!
As a long time geek and lover of technology, I do more shopping online and started WAY earlier doing so than a lot of people. However, nothing takes the place of being able to touch what you buy. Especially items that involve cloth. (Would you buy a couch without trying it out first? I wouldn't.) And regardless of how much I love my e-toys, I and we (meaning all of us) are a tactile species. Brick will NEVER die. It will get smaller and smarter. (I hope.)
0 Votes
+ -
I would side with the vision in Minority Report. This screen (or whatever name you give it) will be subsidized by the retailers. It will recognize you and actively try to sell you targeted merchandise. It won't matter if you need it or not.
Hopefully this will come sooner than 2021. This would be a Godsend to many people. Yes, I know it will make us a bit lazier, but it will be nice to know what you need and when you need it. I must agree that there are times that one needs to see and touch the product before ordering it. Today we research online, check the stores and then, many will buy online because it is less expensive and in some cases one may not pay taxes. I'm sure that the tax savings will be a thing of the past in 2 to 3 years. I would embrace this technology the minute it comes of age.
People already shop hands-on at B&M's but then buy via the iNet. And who has real loyalty to a big box store if the internet offers a better deal?
(I use the iTerm as reference to the internet and not because I love Apple, which I actually do.)
I own a smaller business with strong sales and strong customer support, but I see the iNet challenge. Many costs that I buy at, are now available directly to customers via the internet as vendors turn to the internet to sell direct on Ebay and Amazon "FrontStores".
Five years from now the iNet/iShip experience will have improved greatly because of innovation and technology so there will be a tipping point where, for the masses, product selection, price, product information and SERVICE will be so much better in the iMarket space. The surviving B&Ms will be more iMarket integrated and there will always be a need for B&M's in some form or another.

You have to love the idea of interactive 3-D wall screens delivering amazing details, info and service at amazing speed, saving time, gas and leaving more time for the stuff we love to do.

If the last standing argument is that the service at B&M's are better, then you have to believe the iShopping experience will improve here as well as the iMarket fights for market share. Maybe new job creation will result from someone having to manage Interactive Customer Service Buttons in real time so as to woo the old schoolers and even the newer generations away from their B&M shopping dependance. When will a computer program alone match the B&M customer service advantage?
Got the point of the article only a few paragraphs down and skipped to the end.
What I was hoping for was an article about the current buying trends. What percentage of good are bought on-line compared to at store. I currently bought a computer on line for my daughter. She was all excited because her best friend had one just like it. I would have like to have had it delivered to the store for pickup, but that option wasn't available. I really like the ship to store for expensive items.
0 Votes
+ -
with people like Mindy ...
thx-1138_@... 30th Nov
... it's no surprise Bender will later (..say, around the year 2900) want to kill all humans.
0 Votes
+ -
Jason is right to stimulate thought by extrapolating a future based on existing and soon to be available technology. Whether we like the projection is not the point - it is to invite us all into social debate and to that end he has succeeded. A dystopian future or something that cannot happen - we will see... well done Jason for starting the ball rolling.
0 Votes
+ -
Nuh, uh
tom@... 30th Nov
Won't happen. Too many crooks & criminals & miscreant thieves out there taking advantage of same. SOME will, but those will be the ones with a combined brick/online structure where the two work together as one.
As soon as folks realize all forms of support (returning defunct product, etc) are non-existant, they'll go back to the brick & mortar stores. I use both and find each can provide positives the other often can't.
And online isn't the way to skip sales taxes anymore either; those now have to be paid either by the buyer or the seller, and guess who hands out the money? Yeah, the buyer. Plus shipping fees, handling fees, etc.. Try buying a Sears mail-order online part for $2.00 and see what you actually pay! Many others ae the same.
0 Votes
+ -
Distraction
Bob C User 27th Dec
The use of a certain objectionable word detracted from the whole article. That one word cast such a dismal pall over the whole story that I lost the point. This future seems dreary, where mankind has sunk to the level of machines. Is that what was intended?

Also, it is amazing how many authors (think 1984, 2001 A Space Odyssey [not in any way comparing this to those works, just the title) grossly overestimate how quickly the future will arrive. There is no way this future is common by 2021, if it ever happens.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix