No NBN winner: Govt goes FTTH alone
Summary: The Federal Government has terminated the National Broadband Network tender process with no winner, instead flagging plans to invest billions in building its own fibre-to-the-home network to 90 per cent of Australians over the next eight years.
The Federal Government has terminated the National Broadband Network tender process with no winner, instead flagging plans to invest billions in building its own fibre-to-the-home network to 90 per cent of Australians over the next eight years.
Citing "deterioration of the economy" and flanked by Communications Minister Stephen Conroy and Treasurer Wayne Swan, Prime Minister Kevin Rudd said at a Canberra press conference this morning that the government had not found any of the NBN bids by players like Acacia, Optus, Axia Netmedia satisfactory.
Instead of accepting an NBN bid, Rudd said, the Federal Government would establish a company in partnership with the private sector to roll out its own network, based on fibre-to-the-home (FTTH) technology, that would reach 90 per cent of Australians with speeds of up to 100Mbps.
"This is the single largest nation-building infrastructure project in Australia's history," Rudd said, comparing the project to the Snowy Mountains Hydro scheme and the building of the Sydney Harbour Bridge.
The remaining 10 per cent of Australians would be served by a combination of ADSL broadband, wireless and satellite.
Conroy said the government had found merit in the Tasmanian Government's submission to the NBN process and would begin negotiating with the state's government in the next 24 hours as to how its portion of the NBN could begin construction.
"The Tasmanian roll-out can be commenced by the middle of the year, June, July," he said.
The NBN company, will be majority owned by the Federal Government, Rudd said, with private investment to be taken of up to 49 per cent of the company. The government's share will, subject to market conditions, be sold off by the Federal Government five years after the network is complete, Rudd said.
Rudd said that the company would invest up to $43 billion into the network, not all of which the government would provide. The government is putting in an initial investment of $4.7 billion.
The NBN company will only provide wholesale services, Rudd said, with open access being provided to retail providers.
Rudd said the network would create 7000 jobs and $37 billion in economic activity for the life of the project.
As part of the new NBN process, Conroy has released a discussion paper on telecommunications regulatory reform. It is available from the website of his Department of Communications, Broadband and the Digital Economy.
The Prime Minister added the creation of the company would solve "once and for all" the perceived conflict of interest in Telstra owning Australia's main telecommunications infrastructure and also providing retail services.
"Our critics might say: 'Just let broadband be sorted out by the markets'," Rudd said. "It hasn't occurred over the last decade ... it's time we bit the bullet on this."
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
pie in the sky
NBN + Net Filtering? No thanks.
They could call it "Telecom"
Telstra all over again
And I shall name thee Telecom wait Telstra.......wait Telstra Version 2
waste more money
All your base...?
Spot on there Tom. And so, mandated filtering will be easily accomodated by installing 'infrastructure' in 'THE' wholesaler for the entire country.
I can see it now.
* Fibre to the home!! Woohoo! 100Mbps,
* Speed to the node, 10Mbps,
* backhaul to the "wholesaler" ~ fraction of 1Mbps per user
* Effective speed to user 2.4Kbps
When I was but a youngster I built my first 1200/75 modem from a kit. At least I KNEW I was was an amateur trying to provide (myself) bandwidth.
How it is GovCo thinks they can maintain 49% of the "company" yet inest not even 10% of the capital ($4.7B of projected $43B) ??
What about AusTel ?
Hah! Cost to Taxpayers!!
Sol's investments in mobile broadband are looking good now!!
And now the KRUDD is going back into Telco land!! What a joke when the taxpayers have been down this path!!
No NBN Winner
Providing the government can operate the installation on private sector attitudes with regard to outcomes, the entire country can benefit and this will be a great boost to decentralization.
Waste of time
OMG
Out come all the Telstra Campainers
I can say one thing. Read it as you wish.
Opportunityisnowhere !
Sparks
For christ's sake
I have reservations about their ability to fund the scheme and get it done on time and on budget obviously, but big kudos for having the balls to try and go down the right path.
Well done!!
8-10 years?
...maybe
It's the right path however, as long as the Libs don't come along to privatize it again like they did with Telstra.
Over Regulated
This is because the industry is over regulated and no private company in their right mind was going to build anything (incl Telstra) whilst there was any doubt of the Regulatory aspects. Because no assurances were given no company proceeded.
If they had of invested and built a wonderful network and then the Regulatory body could have turned around and said you need to give open access to all Access Seekers at below cost pricing, just like they have done with ULL.
Avoiding the political minefield
Not awarding the contract to a third party avoids lawyerfest with Telstra. Running fibre to the home avoids using Telstra copper and making it a half-private venture makes it easier on the cheque book now and trivial to sell later.
So, the sudden change in direction was inevitable - the alternative was to put on the blinkers and walk right into the minefield.
PPP?
Selling it to private enterprise will ensure that it fails, just look at the financial crisis to guage the effectiveness of the free market.
Labour stated the ball rolling
Kind of sounds like the present. Labour racks up the credit card debt and ....