Sharp's new screens aim to make HD-LCD pixels mobile
Summary: The company is now producing a new range of panels that will give smartphone screens the same pixel density of full HD-LCD TVs. What does this mean for the firm's future?
Sharp's new 1,080 x 1,920 LCD panels will feature a pixel density of 443 ppi which the technology giant claims is 1.3 times the industry standard and "among the highest in the world".
Production began at the end of September at Mie Plant No. 3 in Kameyama, Japan, and full-scale production of the new smartphone screen is expected to begin this month.

The new LCD panel integrates a new pixel design and revamped manufacturing process to achieve the rate of pixels normally reserved for large LCD television screens. According to Sharp, modern CG-Silicon technology allow the screens to display crisper text, super-clear maps and more realistic HD images.
"By providing ultra-detailed LCD panels to support the growing worldwide demand for smartphones, Sharp will contribute to smartphones with increasingly higher quality images," a company statement read.
Sharp produces the 5-inch screen for Apple's recently released iPhone 5. Before the device launched, reports claimed that the company was lagging behind in production -- and it remained "unclear" whether enough would be produced to cope with consumer demand. In light of today's low supply, an unnamed company executive at the Japanese firm said despite financial issues, the Kameyama LCD plant is manufacturing "adequate volumes" of the screen.
Recent reports have also suggested that Sharp is considering cutting over 10,000 jobs -- representing roughly 18 percent of its global workforce. In addition, the firm doubled cuts in management pay to ten percent in September, slashing end-of-year bonuses by 50 percent.
At the end of Q2, the firm owned $16 billion in debt after failing to reach an agreement with Foxconn over the purchase of a minority stake. However, even as Sharp's shares continue to fall and it remains at "junk" status through agency Standard & Poor's, the ailing firm secured a 360 billion yen ($4.64 billion) loan on Friday provided by the Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ and Mizuho Corporate Bank.
Even with the rescue loan, the balance sheet is not looking healthy for the technology giant. Potentially, the new screens may be part of the Sharp's plan to launch its own range of smartphones in Southeast Asia in collaboration with Foxconn -- giving the firm an advantage over competitors if the screens prove popular with consumers -- as well as a means to clean up its finances.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
A couple of things...
Also, before someone talks about Retina displays and how this is all pointless, you should understand a few things:
1. "Retina" display is just a term Apple cooked up.
2. The number that Apple associates with the term "Retina display" is 326ppi (pixels per inch).
3. The human eye doesn't have an inifinitely clear lens and the human brain couldn't proceess an infinitely sharp image anyway. When Apple say it's past the point where the human eye could differentiate individual pixels, they are assuming a specific distance, and therefore a particular quality of eye. A "Retina display" on a TV is going to have a heck of a lot fewer pixels in every inch than a phone.
4. Having a 443ppi screen is not a complete waste of time and money, as already explained, all you would have to do in order to benefit from the 117 extra pixels in every inch over the iPhone 5, is simply to stare at it a little closer. Another reason you will benefit from having a 1,920x1,080 (1080p) phone is that requires a decent amount of horsepower under the hood for powering the whole thing, and also the experience will be more consistent with whatever personal computer you have, especially for video viewing/editing.
a couple of things
Re: It is useful only for bragging rights
What is going on with Pixel QI?
Another thing...
and the Apple iPad *also* has a "Retina display", at 297ppi.
Both designated the same name despite completely different technical specifications.
Because retina is a marketing term
I always found it interesting that pre-iPhone 4, resolution was not considered to be an important spec by Apple fanbois. Apple really trailed the field back before the iPhone 4 and they handled it by unleashing a legion of astro-turfers to tell us that resolution didn't matter. Then they worked out a good deal with companies like Samsung and used Samsung innovations to release the excellent iPhone 4 (my current smartphone). Suddenly, Apple's displays didn't suck any more and instantly, resolution was incredibly important. Suddenly, we were told that you should never buy a device with low resolution.
Nice try, but your lie
More of the unending market hype
i
There becomes a point where a screen of that resolution
As for Sharp making handsets, I believe they manufactured the old T-Mobile Sidekick devices. Which means Sharp knows how to build quality hardware.
LG Were Showing Off A Screen Like This A Few Months Ago
Was that screen made by Sharp?