Linux and Open Source

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols & Paula Rooney

The first Chromebook Review: Samsung Series 5

By | June 13, 2011, 9:12am PDT

Summary: The first Chromebook, the Samung Series 5, is being shipped and while it’s not a great laptop, it is a very good one. Just don’t think of it as a full Windows laptop replacement. It’s not.

If you want a Windows laptop, get a Windows laptop. But, if you want an easy-to-use, Web-based laptop, consider getting a Chromebook. So long as you realize that the Samsung Series 5 and its brother from another company, the Acer Chromebook, is not a full-featured Windows or Linux notebook computer you’ll be fine.

So it is that I’m pretty happy with my brand new Samsung Series 5 3G even though CNET gave it a just “ok” rating pending software improvements. While neither Chromebook will be generally available until June 15th, I was able to get my hands on one a week early. I’ve been working with mine for several days now and this is what I’ve found.

Hardware:

The Samsung Series 5 comes with a matte 12.1-inch display. It’s powered by an Intel Atom N570 dual-core CPU running at 1.66Ghz, has 2GBs of RAM, and a 16GB solid state drive (SSD). For graphics, it uses an Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 3150.

On the netbook sized system’s left side you’ll find a headset/mic jack, with a USB 2.0 port and a proprietary port for a VGA dongle hidden behind a plastic door. The second USB port and a SIM card slot hide behind plastic door on the right side. In the front you’ll find a card reader that can handle SD, SDHC, SDXC , or MMC cards. At the top of the display, it also has a video-camera.

Under the hood, there’s a 3G radio and 802.11n Wi-Fi. You’ll need one or the other of these because the Samsung doesn’t have an Ethernet port.

There’s also no Bluetooth. I can live without an Ethernet port, but the lack of Bluetooth bugs me. The Samsung, to me, screams to be used with a Bluetooth headset.

On the other hand, The keyboard, while not back-lit, boasts large, well-spaced out keys. Although larger than most netbooks, many laptops have abysmal keyboards. I found the Samsung Series 5 keyboard to be the next best thing to my gold standard for keyboards: the Lenovo ThinkPad’s keyboards.

That said, this is not your normal keyboards. It has no function keys and the delete key is also missing in action. Instead, it duplicates some of this functionality with keyboard shortcuts.

That’s great as far as it goes, but the Chromebook doesn’t have any documentation to speak of so finding the Chromebook keyboard shortcuts can be a pain. The keyboard combo “Ctrl-Alt-?” will show you keyboard overlay that shows most, but not all, of the keyboard shortcuts. For example, Ctrl-M, which opens up the file manager, isn’t to be seen on the overlay.

The touchpad is good-sized and I was able to work with it without much trouble. I say this as someone who hates touchpads. Give me a mouse or the ThinkPad’s pointer any day of the week. The touchpad is capable of multi-touch gestures, but two-finger scrolling is the only one that’s currently supported.

The battery life is remarkable. I’ve used my Chromebook constantly for up to ten plus hours and I’ve yet to bring it under 10% of remaining battery life. I’ve finally found a laptop that, provided my plane had Wi-Fi, I could use constantly over a trans-Atlantic flight.

I could also use that long on my lap comfortably. The Samsung runs cooler than any other laptop or netbook I’ve ever used and at a bit over three-pounds it’s quite light for its size.

Page 2: [The Chromebook's Software] »

Topics

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols, aka sjvn, has been writing about technology and the business of technology since CP/M-80 was the cutting edge, PC operating system

Disclosure

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols is a freelance writer. He does not own stocks or other investments in any technology company.

Biography

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols, aka sjvn, has been writing about technology and the business of technology since CP/M-80 was the cutting edge, PC operating system; 300bps was a fast Internet connection; WordStar was the state of the art word processor; and we liked it!

His work has been published in everything from highly technical publications (IEEE Computer, ACM NetWorker, Byte) to business publications (eWEEK, InformationWeek, ZDNet) to popular technology (Computer Shopper, PC Magazine, PC World) to the mainstream press (Washington Post, San Francisco Chronicle, BusinessWeek).

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?
66
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

Where Google Went Wrong on Chrome Book?
Vyas Rao 27th Mar
I am an ardent fan of Chrome Book. I have one Samsung model, and love it. I liked the concept of not having hardware limitations. Also not to have bulky software, loaded into the system. I like the concept of use the software as needed, and leave it in the cloud. I also like the concept that the programmers can update the software as many times a day they want, and we get the latest version, each time we log on.
The only thing Google went wrong, is that it did not catch up on the glamour and the hype about tablet computers of the present. If they just made a " Chrome Pad", instead of "Chrome Book", it would have sold more. If they insist on the Key pad, we can always have had it as an add on, by blue tooth enabled key pad. They should have cought on this mania about the tablet computers and should have capitalised on it.
Apple's i-pad is great, but it is not a cloud computer as yet. They want to keep using the software loaded version as long as they can, so as to capitalise on it as long as they can. Eventually, all computing will move to cloud, but "Chrome Pad" would have launched us there even faster. And I think, "Chrome Pads" will be a great asset to every class room in this generation, to be able to pull in resources from any data centers.
0 Votes
+ -
Who is the target market?
Cynical99 13th Jun
"If you want a Windows laptop, get a Windows laptop", well that wipes out 85% or more of the target market.

One wonders who the target market really is. It?s definitely not the traveling business person that needs compatibility with the home office. Not the youthful gamer. Not the Apple fanatic.

It?s got to be someone that fits the new (ok, very old) paradigm of being held to a central hard drive rather than that old broken PC Centric data model.

I?m just not sure who that really is. Geeks, early adopters, risk takers and those rebellious enough to take the risk of technologies being introduced into unproven customer acceptance waters, maybe?

Too bad I don?t have the cash to throw away on one.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: The first Chromebook Review: Samsung Series 5
jblossom@... Updated - 13th Jun
@Cynical99 My guess is that there are a good amount of people who are already road warriors and ready to give up the expense, complexity and lack of portability that most OSes offer in exchange for the freedom of the Web. Many of the posts I've seen would seem to bear this out. Experienced professionals with good notebooks are picking up their Chromebook, knowing that it's all that they need for the day. It's a discipline, really, a way of saying that it's okay to rely on the Web. And, increasingly, it is OK, if not in fact preferable to dealing with anti-virus software, the insecurity of sensitive information on a PC, and machines that get worse over time as you add more software. The nicest thing about a Chrome OS machine is that you can buy your next one and spend zero time making the transition. Worth thinking about.
@jblossom@... "insecurity of sensitive information on a PC" and on a Mac. Actually, only those who don't know better tend to have insecure systems. So the same thing can happen with a ChromeOS system.

"Experienced professionals with good notebooks are picking up their Chromebook, knowing that it's all that they need for the day" - You sound like you work for Google. ChromeOS has barely came out. You comment sounds like it's been out for years.
@jblossom@... If only other OS'es gave me something like Chrome so I could use the freedom of the web on other platforms.

Oh wait...
0 Votes
+ -
@jblossom@...
They need compatibility with the home office, and most road warriors use custom built apps from the home office for inventory, sales, expense reporting and the like.

Funny but none of them will run on Chrome. Even if they are browser based, the IT department has to certify the applications against Chrome and that takes time, if anyone in IT cares enough to do it.

Nope, road warriors won't bite. Your sales pitch will fall on deaf ears because they have real jobs to do.
0 Votes
+ -
Chrome, Secure?????
Cynical99 Updated - 14th Jun
@jblossom@...
Well, Chrome may not have been hacked yet, but do you really trust Google with your sensitive corporate documents? We sure don't. Sorry but you really showed how little experience you have in real business.

No way in hell would I allow my sensitive stuff to be anywhere near Google or a cloud I don't control. It'd be gone and no one would ever know because Google doesn't have your best interest in mind, EVER!

Get a life outside of your prejudices and look at the whole picture.
0 Votes
+ -
Umm... smart-phones and tablets...
kaninelupus 15th Jun
@jblossom@...

Seems they already have this space covered with rapidly growing adoption. Here is Australia - where we are known as one of the fastest adopters of new tech.... Wiki it! - smart-phones are expected to go from around 15% of the market early last year till 40 percent PLUS by the end of the year. I honestly can't see these punching all that high in response to that
@Cynical99 "Too bad I dont have the cash to throw away on one."

Good points, especially the last one.
0 Votes
+ -
@Cynical99

There are a number of individuals I guess who would be interested.

A. Those power users, like myself, who see it compares favorably to an iPad (see: http://blog.chipp.com/chromebook-first-impressions/ )

B. Those families who already have Google accounts and want to have a family computer they can share without worrying about trashing files, hard disks, losing work, getting viruses OR having to learn the new OS'es and all it's new tricks, or the new 7000+ features in MS Word 2013. These folks just want to get things done and not worry about whether Lion is cooler than Windows 7.

C. Those small businesses who want to cut costs on IT infrastructure and provide a decent computing platform including support for ~ $28/ yr.
Even a dog once neutered can still function but it will never be the same . . . This is what I foresee with the cromebook. Once you take away its connections the croombook loses it's teeth and becomes as docile as a puppy.
0 Votes
+ -
Meh
Hasam1991 13th Jun
Can't wait to get my hands on a MacBook Air with newer intel processors later on this year!!!!
@Hasam1991 I hate Apple and love Google and I'd agree with you. I'd take a MacBook Air over a Chromebook any day of the week.
@Aerowind i would certainly hope so, looking at the price point. if they put hardware expensive in the chromebook it would be way faster and smoother
0 Votes
+ -
@Hasam1991

We have three here at work to evaulate by the IT group. Yeah get an Air.... you have a MUCH richer environment.
0 Votes
+ -
Nice review - good facts and insights, not like many half-based Chromebook reviews posted last week.
Cant believe one guy actually bought the chrome laptop. oh wait, did he get it for free?
@gunn13 : I'm sure he did.
0 Votes
+ -
This will mark up another Google failure right next to Wave. Why not just carry around a Microsoft Windows notebook? Your not going to notice a difference in the weight of each. And the Microsoft Windows notebook will be able to run native applications as well as anything in the cloud, and there is no monthly fee. Chromebook is pointless.
@LoverockDavidson
"Microsoft Windows notebook will be able to run native applications as well as anything in the cloud, and there is no monthly fee."
Last time I checked a McAfee monthly subscription wasn't free. You wouldn't seriously consider surfing the web on a Windoze notebook without virus protection, would you?
0 Votes
+ -
That's an old argument...
statuskwo5 13th Jun
@slave5tom With ZoneAlarm, Avira , CCCleaner, Ad-Aware, Avast, and Microsoft Security Essentials (all free) who needs McAfee, Norton, etc. Plus I would take Linux any day over ChromeOS.
0 Votes
+ -
@slave5tom
Then don't use McAfee. There are several free antivirus applications out there should you choose to use one. Or you can not load one at all.
@slave5tom
I've never used Antivirus... but I also don't open random .EXE files..
@slave5tom : What does McAfee have to do with Windows and monthly fees? You want a free AV? THere are plenty of them out there. And mcAfee has no monthly subscription.
@slave5tom Been running Windows for over 15 years in school and professionally. The last time I got a virus was when I was about 12 years old and had no idea what I was doing.

How fast was Safari hacked in Pwn2Own this year? Oh yeah, under 10 seconds. Let's just forget the ignorant, ridiculous idea that Macs are somehow more secure viruses and hacks. The fact is, as they get more popular, you'll see them hacked more and more, go figure...
@LoverockDavidson

Better to carry a Macbook since they are lighter than your typical Windows notebook, last longer on a charge, and sleep/resume instantly.

And when you do get a Windows notebook that does all the things as a Macbook (except the reliably sleep/wake) you pay just as much...
@itguy08 : According to who on your comments?
@itguy08 I never got people pointing out the "instant on" and insanely fast sleep/resume on Macs. I've never had any delays with sleep and resume on my PC, and iPhones and iPads are only "instant on" if you never turn it off. Those things take forever to boot up if you turn it all the way off.
@itguy08 i really dont understand this sleep/wake argument. not that i am a mac user. but my 4 year old 1.73 dual core acer with win 7 wakes up instantly... it's so instant that if it were any more instant, i would not feel the difference. Is something wrong with my laptop?
0 Votes
+ -
@vel0city and gunn13

That's the same kind of crap as "Macs don't get viruses"... they aren't any faster waking up than Windows 7.

Even if they were... that one feature is worth paying 2x - 3x more for a Macbook? Negative, Ghostrider.

Also, what itguy08 isn't telling you is: when you load a VM with Windows7 on a Macbook, ya know, to be able to do anything past internet browsing... the battery life is sucked down to nothing.
0 Votes
+ -
@itguy08 Really!?! Could you show us the numbers the back that drivel up please. Oh keep in mind I have a 2011 Macbook Pro, and I have a Dell Latitude E6410, so I'm interested so see your numbers because from where I sit i.e. using both machines on a daily basis you are - as usual - all wet.
0 Votes
+ -
@LoverockDavidson Unless you plan to use Office 365 Enterprise, subscriptions start at $10/month without Document editing, and up to $30/month for everything.
So how do figure "there is no monthly fee." with MS?
0 Votes
+ -
@anothercanuck

Idiot... that's like saying "there's a monthly fee with the Macbook because of MobileMe (iCloud)", or "there's a monthly fee with Chromebook because of Google enterprise offerings"

Or... a consumer could sign up for Office 365 and have a monthly fee without buying ANY computer whatsoever!?

You're as stupid as that idiot up above talking about how McAfee is an absolute necessary, fixed cost
  • Flagged
@LoverockDavidson I have been asking myself the same thing. The only benefit that I have read about is the 10 second boot time, compared to 3-5 minute boot time. And a 8-10 hour run time. The specs are similar to my Windows netbook, with a smaller screen. Running Windows on the netbook has been a little sluggish, ironically, some of the Google sites work better on Mozilla than Chrome browser (Gmail for example).
0 Votes
+ -
You can store your data on the internal 16-gig drive, but what can you do with it if you are not connected to the internet?
0 Votes
+ -
Errrr
Gis Bun 13th Jun
ChromeOS is nothing but a Linux based OS with a web browser for it's desktop. And with that, you can see an increase amount of malware aimed at it. Chrome browser itself is probably the buggiest browsers. Finally, who is this OS made for? Not your typical user. They don't know Linux. They are happy with what they want. It will be just those who like Linux [primarily] that will use it.
@Gis Bun When a traditional linux OS does so much more and you can just refurb an old laptop.

Maybe Google can suck in some "Free and Open" dingbats who would rather give the finger to Apple and MS instead of buying something they can use...like a Windows or Macbook machine.
The battery life sounds great but that's about it. I just don't see how this is going to take off. Maybe if it was $350 instead of $500.
0 Votes
+ -
@sully0208
It's got a dinky screen, no hard drive, no backlit keyboard, no CD. There are no moving parts and no big power drains.
Of course, I see that as a total benefit, so I have no complaints about it. But a MacBook Air or any other SSD-based PC laptop should pull off similar battery life, so I don't see it as a real game-changer.
Likewise, a PC or Mac laptop can do everything a Chromebook can ... and more.
To me, there are only two reasons for the Chromebook's existence: 1) to hook more folks into using Google's services, so it can show (and sell) more ads; 2) to give hard-core geeks something else to play with.

As for the benefit that "you can upgrade with no migration issues" when you replace it ... you could do the same with Windows or Mac, if you enforce strict policies that prevent local-hosted apps, utilities or mods. Have 'em store their work on servers and use hosted apps only and you've got the same situation as a Chromebook.

Cheap Windows laptops even beat the Chromebook on price.

I just don't see a compelling reason to switch to Chromebooks from PCs ... or even more expensive Macs.
0 Votes
+ -
Reserving judgement
Dietrich T. Schmitz, *~* Your Linux Advocate 13th Jun
Steve, I would like to say I am excited by what I read, but, I am not.

But June 15 is a door opening and it will be just a beginning with many choices provided to users who only up to the very recent past had too few.

Choice: brought to you by Google and Linux.
@Dietrich T. Schmitz, *~* Your Linux Advocate

Neither is anybody else, Schmitzy.

You see... we all remember and know how much linux struggles with wifi drivers. 3G? forget about it.

What good is an o/s that relies on the internet, when the underlying architecture can't keep the connection?
0 Votes
+ -
@SonofaSailor
what do u know of underlying architecture .. do you even you what is the meaning of kernel ?
0 Votes
+ -
Nice try...Broadcom is now publishing source with drivers
Dietrich T. Schmitz, *~* Your Linux Advocate 14th Jun
@SonofaSailor

h-t-t-p://www.broadcom.com/support/802.11/linux_sta.php

But carry on with all your resplendent ignorance.
0 Votes
+ -
stop gap for android
Richard1111 13th Jun
This is just an stop gap solution till google gets there android 3.x up to speed with the ipad and blackberry playbook. Having both an netbook and tablet I don't see any need for and netbook anymore, never mind an none Windows one with is more useless.
0 Votes
+ -
What IS the use of this?
grillomalta 13th Jun
The clincher is the $499 ridiculous price tag! For far less than that price (here in Malta, Europe) I can buy a good 11inch netbook running the full Linux Mint OS.

I once was an advocate of these type of packages, but now realise that there is nothing more comfortable than having your own data at hand on your own pc...

Nice, but not particularly thrilling...
0 Votes
+ -
The type of people who would use a Chromebook would also probably be equally as happy with the functionality of an iPad or Galaxy Tab. The problem for the Chromebook is it is just too expensive, at ?349 which is the cheapest I could find, most laptops with Win 7 are cheaper than this. It doesn't make sense at this price.
"Wants to stop spending money on anti-virus software" is same meaning "Wants to stop spending money on managing their(company) firewall"?
0 Votes
+ -
Pot pourri responses to comments above
daboochmeister 14th Jun
Just to get them out of the way, a bunch of responses - mostly just repeating other's comments over the last month or two --

- $499 is a lot, but they'll come down

- Yes, it doesn't fit exactly with what you do today, but they're trying to create a new market niche for a different conception of computing; sure we have opinions on the likelihood of it succeeding (is it Wave [fail] or is it Google Maps [ftw]?), but it'd be hubris to pretend we know at this point

- Working offline is limited only by what apps support working offline - which will grow, if the whole concept catches on (classic chicken and egg)

- Likewise, support for Citrix Receiver and such make it feasible, at least, to address the missing X% of functionality from "classic" apps - but it's TBD whether businesses will re-architect in that direction

- You don't pay monthly if you buy - in fact, you can't do the monthly plan unless you're a school or business, and licensing 10+
0 Votes
+ -
Why doesn't it come with 4G? Galaxy S2 phone comes with 4G? then why cant a Chromebook? More over, I think Chromebook is good, but the data plan that goes with it is now. sad
0 Votes
+ -
Fair...
Naryan 14th Jun
I think this review is very fair. Just like almost all Google products, hard or soft, it is released to a somewhat warm-ish reception, then before long it becomes plain awesome.
I'm not expecting this to be the exception.
0 Votes
+ -
retarded concept
0 Votes
+ -
I am an ardent fan of Chrome Book. I have one Samsung model, and love it. I liked the concept of not having hardware limitations. Also not to have bulky software, loaded into the system. I like the concept of use the software as needed, and leave it in the cloud. I also like the concept that the programmers can update the software as many times a day they want, and we get the latest version, each time we log on.
The only thing Google went wrong, is that it did not catch up on the glamour and the hype about tablet computers of the present. If they just made a " Chrome Pad", instead of "Chrome Book", it would have sold more. If they insist on the Key pad, we can always have had it as an add on, by blue tooth enabled key pad. They should have cought on this mania about the tablet computers and should have capitalised on it.
Apple's i-pad is great, but it is not a cloud computer as yet. They want to keep using the software loaded version as long as they can, so as to capitalise on it as long as they can. Eventually, all computing will move to cloud, but "Chrome Pad" would have launched us there even faster. And I think, "Chrome Pads" will be a great asset to every class room in this generation, to be able to pull in resources from any data centers.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix