X
Tech

Second Circuit overturns remote-DVR ban

New York cable operator Cablevision's planned remote-storage digital video recorder does not violate Hollywood studios' copyrights, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals ruled today (PDF). The decision overturns a district court ruling that blocked introduction of the device because, the lower court said, it would directly infringe on Hollywood IP.
Written by Richard Koman, Contributor

New York cable operator Cablevision's planned remote-storage digital video recorder does not violate Hollywood studios' copyrights, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals ruled today (PDF). The decision overturns a district court ruling that blocked introduction of the device because, the lower court said, it would directly infringe on Hollywood IP. Not so, the appellate court said:

[The service] would not directly infringe plaintiffs' exclusive rights to reproduce and publicly perform their copyrighted works.

"We appreciate the Court's perspective that, from the standpoint of existing copyright law, remote-storage DVRs are the same as the traditional DVRs that are in use today," Tom Rutledge, Cablevision's chief operating officer, said in a statement.

Editorial standards