DoubleClick thought it had it all figured out: it would take its Internet user data, buy direct marketer Abacus Direct, which has actual names and addresses, and put it all together to make lots of money. The plan sounded good -- not to mention profitable -- until the regulators and the privacy backlash appeared.
This week the company confirmed that the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is conducting an informal probe into whether it engaged in unfair or deceptive practices in collecting and maintaining data on consumers. To no one's surprise, DoubleClick shares dropped by 15 percent on Thursday.
Here's what DoubleClick's utopian direct marketing world looks like: with the combination of its assets, the company could target users by name, address and Net preference. Web ads could look like this: "Larry Dignan, I understand you're looking for a mortgage and you just put a bid on a house at this address. We thought you'd like the following rates."
Sure, it's a bit creepy, but that's both the promise and pitfall of the Web. Consumers want everything for free, but scream when they find out they're being profiled. Investors should closely watch this privacy flap, because if regulators crack down hard on DoubleClick, no Net company will ever make money.
"Everybody on the Net has some right to privacy," said Jeff Goverman, an analyst with Pacific Crest Securities. "But let's get real. The reason why there's free content is because there is a quid pro quo. Every newspaper and magazine sells lists."
Wall Street analysts said they thought the FTC probe wouldn't hurt DoubleClick. However, some did entertain us with a worst case scenario -- new privacy laws. If DoubleClick isn't allowed to track your every move, maybe that makes the direct advertising model championed by Yahoo! and others less effective. There goes the profit hopes folks! "DoubleClick is only one of the many companies that could be affected by changes in the law," said Lowell Singer, an analyst with Robertson Stephens, in a research note.
On another level, the FTC probe could also cast a pall over marketing companies such as 24/7 Media, Engage Technologies and Matchlogic, which is owned by Excite@Home. And on a purely financial level, DoubleClick may have wasted millions of its common stock to buy Abacus, so that it could connect the names and addresses with the anonymous Net profiles.
The big question now is where do DoubleClick shares go from here. We've seen these government/corporate jousts before, and investors typically hit the snooze bar. Microsoft and the US Justice Department are still fighting, even though the whole Net landscape has changed. The government raised concerns about Network Solutions and its domain registration, and resolved the situation by giving the company a cushy deal that ensures it will remain a cash cow.
DoubleClick's FTC flap won't be any different. Sure, the states are coming on side with the government, but the lawsuits will always fly when an issue becomes popular. "In the end, I don't believe this is a real issue," said Goverman.
Goverman's take is on target. In the end, this FTC probe will blow over and shares will do fine. But there will be some mileposts to watch as this privacy problem plays out. Here are a few items to watch:
DoubleClick's public relations game It has already started. The company has changed its privacy policies, and maintains users can just opt out of the tracking. The only problem is most users don't realise they're being tracked in the first place. Opting out is a direct marketing practice that may have to be rethought on the Web. How about allowing users to opt in for tracking? On Thursday, DoubleClick said that it was confident the regulatory cloud would clear. "We are confident that our business policies are consistent with our privacy statement and beneficial to consumers and advertisers," the company said. "DoubleClick has never, and will never, use sensitive online data in our profiles."
That statement doesn't mean DoubleClick never thought about selling sensitive data. Privacy controversy has surrounded the company ever since it revealed new plans to track Internet user movements and connect the information with real names and addresses. In response to the controversy, DoubleClick is trying to promote itself as privacy champion.
Engage goes on the offensive Imagine a CMGI company taking a swipe at a competitor? CMGI/Engage will be watching this DoubleClick flap closely. CMGI bought Flycast, Adforce and a host of other direct marketing concerns. Now they are lumped in with Engage. The key difference? Engage is a champion of anonymous profiles, which are more palatable to privacy wonks. Matchlogic will stump for the anonymous approach, too. The DoubleClick/FTC problems may be a good opportunity for Engage and MatchLogic to raise their profiles.
Engage didn't waste any time on Thursday. It announced that 41 new marketers and advertisers have recently purchased online media through Engage and its affiliates, Flycast and Adsmart. And, in case you forgot, "Core to Engage's next generation solutions is Engage Knowledge, a database of 42 million anonymous profiles, which enables media buyers and advertisers to specify a target audience based on demographics, geographics and over 800 interest categories," the company said in a statement.
The newbie effect First hack attacks, and now this. Privacy and security concerns could put a lid on newbie spending on the Net. Problems with auction fraud, eBay's dealings with auction portals, eToys' marketing and Amazon.com's use of consumer data are all beginning to pile up. Regulators are becoming more vigilant and could hinder growth. Throw in a pile of consumer complaints, and Net titans have a lot to worry about.
What do you think? Tell the Mailroom and read what others have to say.
See techTrader for more technology investment news, plus quotes and research.
See Inter@ctive Investor for US tech investor news.