There is no such thing as a cloud operating system — and we're some way off even needing one, says Lori MacVittie.
Google's foray into the operating-system business was barely public before it was being hailed as the latest cloud operating system, with some industry watchers saying this product could be pivotal in the cloud revolution.
To be fair, Google's Chrome OS is not the only operating system to which the cloud handle has been attached. It is merely the latest in a long line of attempts to capitalise on the growing interest and hype surrounding cloud computing.
There is no such thing. It is a myth existing entirely in the minds of those who cannot seem to get enough cloud in their daily technology diets. And the problem in perpetuating that myth is that it continues to confuse an already confused market.
Millions of IT professionals who should be able to separate marketing jargon from technical definitions are confused and unable to articulate a definition for the cloud. It borders on exploitation to label something a cloud product just to make it appear as if participating in the cloud involves special requirements.
A typical IT department spends 80 percent of its budget keeping the lights on, managing, patching, cooling and otherwise caring for servers and applications in their own datacentres, according to analyst firm Gartner. It makes sense to move some of this burden to the cloud, so it is shocking to see vendors perpetuate confusion for their own gain.
A cloud operating system is unnecessary at this point in the evolutionary cycle of the technology. Part of the allure of the cloud is its reliance on the internet, which, as everyone knows, is built on established, well-supported standards such as TCP/IP.
Applications served via the internet are almost always transported via HTTP, which completes the standards-based trifecta that has long supported the web, and now makes the cloud realistic.
Nothing special is required for an operating system to support the cloud. No new standards, no new capabilities, and no new functionality at the operating-system layer.
Cloud computing, as implemented today, is evolutionary — not revolutionary — and combines the best of hosted services with application management at the provisioning layer. There is very little about the operating system that needs modification even on the server side — that is, at the cloud provider — and absolutely nothing that needs changing in the deep underbelly of the client operating system.
To be fair, so-called cloud operating systems may be delivered with cloud-specific management and development tools as part and parcel of the distribution, but these are applications and are almost certainly not a part of the operating system itself.
Operating systems focus on I/O, file, CPU and memory management, and on scheduling the core operations into which all applications ultimately break down. Operating systems are granular, tightly focused systems that know nothing about clouds or networks or even applications, except as they relate to the next machine-code instruction that must be executed.
As cloud computing moves towards what purists might deem real cloud computing — the provisioning at the compute-resource level or distribution of applications at the functional level without modification — it may be that operating systems will need to change and evolve and adapt to the specific needs of such an environment.
When the operating system takes into consideration other CPUs and banks of memory on nearby machines when it schedules an instruction, then we will need a cloud operating system.
Lori MacVittie is responsible for application services education and evangelism at application delivery firm F5 Networks. Her role includes producing technical materials and participating in community-based forums and industry standards organisations. MacVittie has extensive programming experience as an application architect, as well as in network and systems development and administration.