Michael Arrington today cites “a failure by companies to drive earnings enough to keep up with stock prices” as a principal reason for the “Web 1.0 implosion.”
It is a surprising public perspective from Arrington, given that his Web 2.0 TechCrunch phenomenon, “founded on June 11, 2005,” rarely discusses the need for earnings, revenues or even business models, when “obsessively profiling and reviewing new Internet products and companies.”
TechCrunch cheerleads daily on behalf of twenty something software developers rapidly prototyping cool Web 2.0 apps. TechCrunch is not obsessed with the commercial viability or long-term sustainability of new Internet products and companies, however.
Arrington reaffirmed his disdain for Web 2.0 business plans today at “The Future of Web Apps Summit. No need for a “perfect revenue model” in Arrington’s Web 2.0 book. Moreover, Arrington warns that Web 2.0 “losers” all “over business-planned.
Has Arrington gotten public Web 2.0 business plan religion for the Web 2.0 start-ups he obsesses about? Not really.
While his “Bubble, bubble, bubble” commentary today acknowledges “the public markets…won’t let companies go public on the vague promise of future revenues and profitability,” he hails “Network Effect is still the most powerful force driving Internet success today.”
Arrington asserts: “I disagree that Web 2.0 companies cannot become sustainable businesses,” but he only offers “network” traction, or popularity with non-paying users, as a mark of sustainable businesses, with unprofitable Digg, Facebook, YouTube, put forth as examples for emulation.