Yet another trove of sensitive US voter records has leaked

Each record contained details on voters, including names, addresses, dates of birth, their ethnic identity, whether an individual is married, and the individual's voting preferences.
Written by Zack Whittaker, Contributor

(Image: file photo)

A cache of voter records on over a half-million Americans has been found online.

The records, totaling 593,328 individual sets of records, appear to contain every registered voter in the state of Alaska, according to security researchers at the Kromtech Security Research Center, who found the database.

The records were stored in a misconfigured CouchDB database, which was accessible to anyone with a web browser -- no password needed -- until Monday when the data was secured and subsequently pulled offline.

The exposed data is just a portion of a larger voter file compiled by TargetSmart, which said its national voter file -- that contains 191 million voters -- is the "most comprehensive and up-to-date voter file ever assembled." The data is collected and used to help political campaigns with their fundraising, research, and voter contact programs, the company said.

ZDNet was provided a small sample of the records for verification.

Each XML-formatted record contained details, some sensitive and personally identifiable information, on prospective voters, including names, addresses, dates of birth, their ethnic identity, whether an individual is married, and the individual's voting preferences.

But the data also contained highly personal information, such as household income, the age ranges of an individual's children, and if an individual is a homeowner. The records -- some are more complete than others -- also have fields for the types of issues that an individual can be lobbied on, such as climate change, gun control, and tax reforms.

When reached, TargetSmart said that a third-party company was to blame for the data exposure.

"We've learned that Equals3, an [artificial intelligence] software company based in Minnesota, appears to have failed to secure some of their data and some data they license from TargetSmart, and that a database of approximately 593,000 Alaska voters appears to have been inadvertently exposed," said Tom Bonier, Targetsmart chief executive.

Bonier said the data was not accessed by anyone other than the security researchers at TargetSmart and the team that identified the exposure.

"None of the exposed TargetSmart data included any personally identifiable, non-public financial data," he said.

"To be clear, TargetSmart's database and systems are secure and have not been breached. TargetSmart imposes strict contractual obligations on its clients regarding how TargetSmart data must be stored and secured, and takes these obligations seriously," Bonier added.

Equals3 chief executive Dan Mallin confirmed it had "experienced an intrusion of a sample data set on one of our development servers." He said that the server wasn't in use by any of the company's clients and was shut down.

"This was an isolated intrusion, stemming from a white hat group who was searching for a known vulnerability in couchDB," referring to Kromtech security researchers.

"We have diligently conducted a forensic audit confirming the data set was not downloaded," he said.

This is the second known data exposure of voter records this year.

The first, and largest ever to date, saw 198 million records on individuals from every state exposed. Deep Root Analytics, a data company working for the Republican party, took responsibility for the exposure.

Kromtech has in recent years discovered and reported on several US voter databases online, totaling 18 million voters, as well as the state of Louisiana's entire database of 2.9 million voters.

Kromtech's Alex Kernishniuk said the exposure was "yet another wake-up call" for companies and governments to audit their networks.

"There seems to be no end in sight for improperly secured data making its way onto the web, and with little or no accountability for proper storage and security measures, it is up to regulators to decide the best way to manage an aging electoral system that seems to be struggling to keep up with the digital age," he said.

Editorial standards