Well, we can keep limping along or we can make a concerted effort to educate our administrators as well as our faculty as to the benefits of a rich computing environment -- utilizing a variety of computing solutions to meet as broad a range of educational needs as possible. In an environment as politically complex higher education, or even a school district, administrators like nothing better than being able to demonstrate to their colleagues what they could do with better funding of critical services. Education IT needs to advocate for those services it provides -- not just accept the money they give you and hope they don't take it away before it's gone. Planning prior to each budget cycle, asking for what you need, and backing up your requests with sound data will serve your needs, and the needs of your educators and students much more effectively than just wishing you had more funding.
Our telling them what they need just doesn't cut it either. We have to be technology advocates for our schools. We have to be able to demonstrate how much technology can benefit our schools and above all we have to get our administrators to accept that to deliver consistent services to our students and educators, we must have life-cycle funding.
We can argue all day about what a reasonable life-cycle should be. We can debate when we should re-purpose aging hardware and when selling old hardware at surplus makes more sense. Do the cost-benefit analysis for yourselves and adopt whatever life-cycle makes sense but spend some time with your administrators and your educators advocating for the solutions that work best for your school. No one set of solutions will meet every body's needs but without life-cycle funding, the quality of services which you can deliver will suffer.
Learn to think like CIO's -- not consumers -- and your educators, your administrators, and your students will benefit from those efforts.