How to use RAID in 2014

Years ago I wrote a post "Why RAID 5 stops working in 2009". Five years later you can still buy many RAID5 arrays. Was I wrong?

No. In that post I laid out the simple problem with RAID 5 in 2009:

  • Disks fail.
  • When they fail the remaining disks are asked to read every available sector to rebuild the lost data on a new drive. 
  • The common unrecoverable read error (URE) spec is often still 1 in every 10^14 bits read. One error in about every 12.5TB.
  • With a 4 drive RAID 5 using 4TB desktop drives, that's 12TB of capacity - and a high likelihood of an URE.
  • When the URE happens your rebuild fails.

Now what?
First, don't panic. I own 3 different 4 drive arrays and I'm OK.


Because I understand the limitations of the technology and take steps to protect my data. What is the key step?

Don't keep your only copy of important data on a single array!

I keep data copied between arrays - a simple form of mirroring - so if an array fails I still have my data AND can recreate it if a drive rebuild fails.

Limits of RAID 5
With today's large drives you need to look at their error rates. Desktop drives are typically cheaper and have a 10^14 spec.

But drives intended for RAID typically have a higher spec: 10^15, which is one URE every 100GB or so. Much safer.

But regardless of the drive spec, you always need to back up! Whether to another array, as I do, or to the cloud or tape, you cannot rely on any storage device to safely keep your only copy of important data.

The Storage Bits take
RAID 5 still "works" in 2014. But only if you take precautions.

I speak to end-users who thought RAID meant their data was safe - and then discover it wasn't.

RAID offers speed and capacity, but safety comes from copies, not RAID. Remember that and you'll be fine - even in 2024.l

Comments welcome, as always. What is your RAID backup strategy?


You have been successfully signed up. To sign up for more newsletters or to manage your account, visit the Newsletter Subscription Center.
See All
See All