Mozilla license becoming Apache-compatible
![dana-blankenhorn.jpg](https://www.zdnet.com/a/img/resize/9901f0c28381677d8bf5ced1b5af181cd77e3a1c/2014/07/22/220ebf26-1175-11e4-9732-00505685119a/dana-blankenhorn.jpg?auto=webp&fit=crop&frame=1&height=192&width=192)
Mozilla is best known for its Firefox browser. (Picture from Wikimedia.)
Call it one small step by a licensor, one giant leap against license proliferation.
The most important result may be to make it easy for Google Code contributions to move into the browser. Google is a big supporter of the Apache license.
The Black Duck Knowledge Center currently lists Mozilla as the 10th most popular open source license with 1.22% of the market. Apache is 7th with 4.01%. The three main GPL licenses -- GPL V.2, LGPL, and GPL V. 3 -- together represent more than 60% of the license market.
Apache has momentum, however. Matt Asay called it better for open source businesses last year -- he's now COO of Ubuntu, which uses the GPL. Bruce Perens has written that only three licenses are really necessary -- a "gift" license, a "sharing with rules" license, and a hybrid between the two.
Most open source license proliferation involves the rules under which sharing takes place. The OSI's License Proliferation Committee says there are dozens of OSI-approved licenses out there but only nine (including Apache and Mozilla) have what it calls "strong communities" around them.
License proliferation is a big issue among big companies, since some licenses have terms that contradict one another, forcing corporate projects to be built with multi-license distributions that can be confusing.
Version 1.0 of the Mozilla Public License was written by Mitchell Baker when she was a lawyer for Netscape. The current version, 1.1, was written by the Mozilla Foundation and is a hybrid of BSD and GPL terms.
The new license, Mozilla Public License V.2, is expected to be out by the end of the year.