The study showed that chatbot use is outpacing manual calls to customer service lines.
Two-out-of-three respondents reported interacting with a chatbot or digital assistant for a customer service need in the last month. This compares to almost three out of five (59%) who said they have called a customer service line.
Over half (57%) of consumers said that they find human customer service agents to be more effective in solving problems or handling their needs. However, one in three (35%) said that they find bots and customer service agents to be equally effective.
Timing matters when customers want a response quickly.
When asked "On average, do you find chatbots or traditional customer service agents more time efficient in handling your needs?", nearly half (49%) of Americans said that they find traditional human customer service agents more time efficient in handling their needs.
Only one-in-four respondents said they find chatbots to be more time efficient, and the other 25% of consumers said they find both to be equally time efficient.
Generation Z and millennial respondents were the most likely (30%) to report that they find their interactions with chatbots to be more time efficient than human customer service agents.
Whilst one in three (36%) of the general population reported they would prefer a human over a bot, the majority of respondents (46%) reported that they would "pick a chatbot if it meant I could solve my issue faster."
Americans are using or want to use chatbots more, but machines do not seem to be providing better customer service experiences than humans do at the moment.
And despite human interactios having the edge at the moment, our desire to turn to bots to save time shows that traditional customer service agents also have plenty of room for improvement.