Roster
The BSA’s biggest strength is perhaps its
membership, and two of the companies that were among the original founders
remain powerful members: Microsoft and Autodesk.
“Just about every other
company has undergone some kind of a change in corporate identity, so that we
now have, at least on the face of it, a different roster of members,” Kruger
said.
The BSA’s current membership boasts
the biggest companies in the computer industry. In addition to Microsoft, it
includes Adobe, Apple, and IBM, companies whose presence in international
markets demands some kind of protections for their properties. Kruger said that
as a result of the BSA’s efforts, most countries in the international
marketplace now have laws in place designed to protect the intellectual property
rights of software and e-commerce developers.
Enforcement
The strength of its membership has
helped the BSA grow into a powerful organization that is increasingly flexing
its muscles to fight software piracy and maintain licensing compliance among
business users. Kruger said that the BSA is best known today for its efforts to
enforce software licensing laws.
“We are viewed by many as the software
police, the organization that will, in fact, investigate and pursue instances of
infringement that come to its attention.”
Perhaps the most potent action
the BSA takes is the auditing of companies under investigation for possible
software license infringements. When the BSA has obtained adequate evidence to
pursue a case, it will obtain court orders to conduct audits of the software
installed on company computers. Kruger emphasized that this occurs only in cases
where the BSA has gathered enough evidence to show that a company has violated
software license agreements.
“We try very hard here to make sure that
we’re only proceeding on the basis of reliable information.”
The investigation
Information on possible
violations typically arrives via the BSA’s piracy hotline or its Web site. In
most cases, Kruger said, the callers are either current or former employees of
the companies they are reporting. He acknowledged that many are former employees
who feel they’ve been wronged by the companies in some way.
“We’ve found
that there are plenty of employees with an axe to grind who actually have very
good, credible, detailed information. The challenge for the BSA, of course, is
to separate out the disgruntled employees with good information from the
disgruntled employees with bad information.”
Only when the BSA has
established that the information is credible does it begin to take action
against the targeted company. After the preliminary investigation, which
includes obtaining a detailed statement from the caller and checking
registration records with the software company whose licenses are being
violated, the BSA contacts the company to give it the opportunity to cooperate
in the investigation. At this point, however, the BSA has already built a solid
case of license infringement against the company and will likely end up levying
fines against it.
“If a company is being contacted by the BSA either
directly or through our lawyers, it’s usually too late for the company to simply
get into compliance; it's too late to do what they should’ve done in the first
place.”
The consequences of noncompliance
What can happen
if you fail to comply with the licensing agreements for the software you use?
Consider the case of Washington, DC-based Adrenaline Group Inc., a software
development and Web consulting company. In May 2001, the company agreed to pay
$103,000 to the BSA to settle a claim that it was using unlicensed commercial
software. A Washington Post article reported that Adrenaline Group was
among hundreds of companies that were tipped off to the BSA via its piracy
hotline.
After being contacted by the BSA, Adrenaline Group conducted an
internal audit and found it was using more copies of particular programs than it
had licenses for. Adrenaline said that the software licensing issue was
unintentional and arose as a consequence of the company’s rapid growth.
According to Kruger, this is the case for many of the companies the BSA has
investigated. Companies that run into problems aren't necessarily bad—they just
haven't paid enough attention to their software licensing.
When the BSA has established solid evidence of violations and contacted the
company, the company must take steps to get into compliance. It will also have
to pay fines for the violations.
Kruger said that the violating company
must take these actions to resolve the case: