With more powerful cellphone cameras, who needs stand-alone digital cameras?
![zd-defaultauthor-russell-shaw.jpg](https://www.zdnet.com/a/img/resize/aab0ecb7fa6229ddd570d9e60960c37cdb96c2ed/2014/12/04/3c90fefa-7b70-11e4-9a74-d4ae52e95e57/zd-defaultauthor-russell-shaw.jpg?auto=webp&fit=crop&frame=1&height=192&width=192)
Just today, Telecoms Korea reports that an eight megapixel cellphone camera will get here next year:
Samsung Electro Mechanics (SEM) developed the world first CMOS camera module supporting up to 8-megapixel camera phones. The mass production will start in the first half of 2008. The mobile handset equipped with the 8-megapixel module will support maximum 3,264×2,444 pixels and 27.64 X 20.73 centimeters for high-resolution printing, according to the company.
It is a fair bet that these products are close to, or even exceed, the highest megapixel settings possible on your digital camera.
You might say that even cheapo digital cameras offer a greater amount of settings and controls than the new generation of high-res cellphone cameras do. But I am convinced that most users of these cameras don't fiddle with these choices much.
I know that some of you are Digital SLR camera owners. But with these users excepted, my point is:
Hey, you will be carrying a cellphone around anyway. When mobile phones commonly include cameras up to eight megapixels or even higher, why would any non-serious digital photographer schlep around a stand-alone digital camera as well?
What do you think?
[poll id=174]