A slow website is a bad website. You'd think that in the 23 years we've been using the web, we'd had figured this out. The average user has no patience for slow sites.
According to surveys done by Akamai and Gomez.com, nearly half of web users expect a site to load in 2 seconds or less. If it's not loaded in 3 seconds, they're already on their way to another site. 79 percent of web shoppers who have trouble with website performance say they won't come back to a site to buy again. 44 percent of them say they'll tell their friends to avoid poorly performing sites.
In general, as you'd expect, the e-commerce sites were the fastest. That doesn't mean they were fast enough to make customers happy. Radware found that the "time to interact" (TTI) averaged 3.1 seconds, just shy of the 3-second threshold users expect. Only 24 percent of web pages had TTI speeds of 3 seconds or below.
Load time, the time it takes to load all items on a page, is less important than TTI. For example, while Amazon.com has a load time of 10.569 seconds, it has a TTI of 1.8 seconds. No one questions that Amazon is the most successful e-commerce site in the United States.
Indeed, by Radware's metrics, Amazon.com is the second fastest e-commerce site. Only Mercado Livre, a Brazilian online marketplace owned by eBay, is faster. The other top sites, with the exception of Ikea, are also Amazon and eBay related sites.
For news and media sites, the content is the product in the eyes of the consumer, although they certainly don't want to pay subscription fees, In order, the top five fastest media sites are: Google News, The Guardian, Russia's Yandex news, the Polish Onet news site, and the Indian news site, Rediff.
Generally speaking, the top news and media sites have dismal performance with a median TII of 4.1 seconds, Only 22 percent of the sites broke the 3-second barrier. The reasons for this were:
Thirty percent of sites tested scored an "F" for image compression on WebPagetest.org, with just 8 percent earning an "A" grade.
Central "hero" images were often delayed due to other elements taking up the HTTP connections and those requests having to wait in line.
As bad as new media sites were, the sports sites were even worse. Only 6 percent had TIIs under 3 seconds, with 34 percent taking at least twice the 3-second target to load. The median TII was 5.2 seconds.
Only three sports sites had even half-way decent numbers. These were Yalla-shoot, an Arabic-language soccer site; rojadirecta.com, a site that aggregates live sport streams; and NFL.com. The National Football League site was easily the fastest, with a TII of 2.9 seconds, of the well-known sites. The problems with sport sites tend to be too many resort requests per page, larger pages, and lousy image compression.
Travel sites, like e-commerce sites, tended to be faster. The fastest of the fast here is Babt. This obscure site was followed by the far more well known: Priceline.com, Hotels.com, British Airways, and Delta.
No matter your industry, after decades of work, websites still aren't built for speed.
That's the bad news. The good news is that it means that if you can build a fast website in almost any industry, you're likely to quickly find new customers. The current generation of websites simply aren't fast enough for today's users and you can use that to your company's advantage.