'ZDNET Recommends': What exactly does it mean?
ZDNET's recommendations are based on many hours of testing, research, and comparison shopping. We gather data from the best available sources, including vendor and retailer listings as well as other relevant and independent reviews sites. And we pore over customer reviews to find out what matters to real people who already own and use the products and services we’re assessing.
When you click through from our site to a retailer and buy a product or service, we may earn affiliate commissions. This helps support our work, but does not affect what we cover or how, and it does not affect the price you pay. Neither ZDNET nor the author are compensated for these independent reviews. Indeed, we follow strict guidelines that ensure our editorial content is never influenced by advertisers.
ZDNET's editorial team writes on behalf of you, our reader. Our goal is to deliver the most accurate information and the most knowledgeable advice possible in order to help you make smarter buying decisions on tech gear and a wide array of products and services. Our editors thoroughly review and fact-check every article to ensure that our content meets the highest standards. If we have made an error or published misleading information, we will correct or clarify the article. If you see inaccuracies in our content, please report the mistake via this form.
Apple claims Studio Display webcam issues will be fixed via software update
Now that the first reviews for Apple's new Studio Display are beginning to pour in, a worrisome issue with the unit has appeared, causing enough of an uproar that Apple has already promised a software fix.
The problems focus on the device's built-in webcam. As one of the headline features of the device that Apple highlighted during its Peek Performance event, the camera's performance was under intense scrutiny.
Unfortunately for Apple, the webcam is being heavily panned in almost every review. It's been called out for noisy imagery, outdated visuals, poor focus control, terrible low-light performance, and a surprising range of other deficits. It's worth noting that all of these issues occurred while using the display with a Mac, meaning they can't be blamed on its known lack of full Windows support.
Apple
The issues were so severe that Nilay Patel, who reviewed the unit for The Verge, contacted Apple with an array of photographic evidence showing just how badly the webcam was performing.
In response, Apple spokesperson Jennie Orphanopoulos told Patel that the company's team had "looked into the images [he] shared, and discovered an issue where the system is not behaving as expected." She went on to promise that they would be "making improvements in a software update."
While this rather vague reply does indeed seem to indicate the webcam was never supposed to look this bad, it doesn't provide a timeframe for when users might be able to expect improvements, nor does it explain why the device is performing poorly on just about every level, or how it was allowed to be released in such a state.
It's an unfortunate black mark on a unit that seemingly would have made an excellent, all-in-one video chat solution, judging by the widespread praise its speakers and microphone have received in early reviews.
More: Best webcam 2022: Top choices for WFH video calls | Best video chat app 2022: Top virtual meeting software
That said, the display as a whole has earned less-than-perfect marks from multiple outlets, with several reviewers also pointing out issues with the Studio Display that can't be fixed via software updates, including its lack of support for more modern display technologies such as HDR and local dimming, as well as its starting price and $400 upcharge for height adjustability.