Not surprisingly, the Lower Merion School District, which has been embroiled in a scandal over the use student laptop webcams, announced a settlement yesterday with all involved parties. While this particular story may be over, questions linger for many schools looking to provide student laptops. If ever there was a disincentive for 1:1 education, this is it.
All that aside, though, the unfortunate side effect of bad judgment in Lower Merion (yes, I'm being very diplomatic) is that schools considering 1:1 programs for their students now need to contend with parents, school committees, and administrators gun shy about expensive litigation. Schools have more than enough liability to begin with and adding another layer is never an attractive option.
Obviously, clear policies and transparent actions (as well as any number of great anti-theft measures that don't involve taking pictures with a web cam that may or may not be on and may or may not be looking at a student instead of a thief) would have prevented what amounts to close to 2 million dollars worth of litigation in Lower Merion ($1.2 million has already been spent on the case). Yet schools looking at major investments in technology have enough hurdles surrounding great implementations and classroom integration. They don't need legal hurdles and bad precedents fighting against them as well.
Lower Merion now has a pretty solid set of policies in place regarding the laptops (surprise) and, in fact, it can serve as a model for other districts looking to roll out such programs. The key message? Let's learn from Lower Merion and do 1:1 the right way rather than let expensive litigation and liability concerns prevent us from doing it at all.