Australian aged care provider trials driverless vehicle

The driverless vehicle is being running along an eight stop loop around an IRT retirement village.
Written by Campbell Kwan, Contributor

Aged care provider, the IRT group, is trialling a driverless vehicle at one of its aged care centres in Canberra.

The two-week trial began on 10 May and uses a driverless vehicle to drive retirement village residents around its IRT Kangara Waters retirement village.

The driverless vehicle used in the trial, EasyMile's EZ10 autonomous shuttle, follows an eight stop loop of IRT Kangara Waters and can carry up to eight passengers. The EZ10 also has a deployable access ramp to accommodate passengers with mobility aids, IRT CEO Patrick Reid said.

The purpose of the trial, IRT said, is to determine how driverless vehicles can be used to improve the independence and quality of life of older people.

"As we test the EZ10 on the private roads within IRT Kangara Waters we hope to better understand how it could help aged care and retirement living residents travel more independently and in turn reduce the social isolation that can occur when it's hard to get out and about without the assistance of a friend or family member," Reid said.

"Many residents are still mentally very capable but no longer drive due to common life changing events, such as the loss of a driver's licence due to age, a fall causing mobility difficulties, loss of hearing or eyesight."

See: Our autonomous future: How driverless cars will be the first robots we learn to trust (cover story PDF)

According to IRT, quantitative and qualitative data will be collected throughout the trial to measure perception shifts and behavioural changes of participating residents. The data collected will be shared with government and industry bodies to assist in the development of public policy surrounding the use of autonomous vehicle technologies in an aged care and retirement living settings.

The project is partially funded by Telstra.

The Easymile EZ10 has been used to operate selected bus routes around Oslo, Norway since June last year.

Elsewhere in Australia, the South Australian government in January launched a six month trial of a new autonomous bus and smart transit hub in Adelaide while the Victorian government gave approval for Bosch to test automated driving systems on the state's rural roads during that same month.

New South Wales, meanwhile, has also ramped up its driverless shuttle efforts, completing the first passenger trip on its Driverless Smart Shuttle in September last year, which used a Navya shuttle at Sydney Olympic Park in September.

The Navya shuttle is considered a level four, highly autonomous vehicle designed to carry up to 12 passengers. It can travel up to 40kph in autonomous mode, with features including front and rear cameras, LIDAR, GPS technology, and autonomous emergency brakes.

Similar efforts are also underway in the country's west, with Perth previously chosen as one of three cities to host a trial of Navya's electric, driverless fleet, run by the Royal Automobile Club (RAC) of Western Australia and the WA government.


Transport Commission concerned over government access to citizen vehicle data

The National Transport Commission is probing whether current privacy and information access frameworks are going to be adequate when automated vehicles take to Australian streets.

Moving from planes, trains, and automobiles to 'mobility-as-a-service': A peek into the future of transport in Sydney

The state of New South Wales is preparing for a future of work underpinned by autonomous vehicles, smart highways, and regional hubs. Here's a look at the 2056 plan for Sydney and its surrounds.

Bosch to trial automated vehicle tech in country Victoria

The automotive parts giant was handed a AU$2.3 million grant to trial the technology.

Will human drivers always be the weak link when sharing the road with autonomous vehicles? (TechRepublic)

A collision between a self-driving shuttle and a human-driven truck in Las Vegas shows the inevitability of accidents, and who is more likely to be at fault, as we share the road with robots.

Editorial standards