'

Google: Here's why we're pulling out of Pentagon's $10bn JEDI cloud race

Google won't bid for the Department of Defense's massive cloud contract because it could conflict with its AI principles against developing weapons.

Google will no longer compete for the Pentagon's winner-take-all JEDI cloud computing contract that could be worth up to $10bn over a decade.

Google, Amazon, IBM, Microsoft, and Oracle have been vying for the JEDI, or Joint Enterprise Defense Infrastructure, contract to supply cloud infrastructure to the Pentagon, allowing the Department of Defense to consolidate its data centers.

Potential bidders have until October 12 to submit proposals but Google confirmed today to Bloomberg that it has dropped out of the process because the project conflicted with its new AI principles.

"We are not bidding on the JEDI contract because first, we couldn't be assured that it would align with our AI Principles," a Google spokesman said in a statement.

"And second, we determined that there were portions of the contract that were out of scope with our current government certifications."

Google published its AI principles in June, months after thousands of Google employees protested its work on Maven, a Pentagon project that used Google-developed AI to identify objects in drone footage.

SEE: How to implement AI and machine learning (ZDNet special report) | Download the report as a PDF (TechRepublic)

Google's AI principles included that it would not design or deploy AI for weapons, surveillance, or other tech designed principally to injure people.

Ahead of publishing its AI principles, Google said it would not attempt to renew the Project Maven deal after it expired in 2019.

Some at Google reportedly saw the project as a stepping stone to work under JEDI, but it wasn't certain at the time whether Google's new AI principles would stop it bidding from that work.

Google said it would have submitted a proposal for portions of the work if JEDI were a multi-vendor arrangement.

"Had the JEDI contract been open to multiple vendors, we would have submitted a compelling solution for portions of it," the Google spokesman said.

"Google Cloud believes that a multi-cloud approach is in the best interest of government agencies, because it allows them to choose the right cloud for the right workload."

IBM, Microsoft, and Oracle have also had problems with the Pentagon's winner-take-all approach to JEDI.

Previous and related coverage

Department of Defense's updated cloud-computing contract still is winner-take-all

Microsoft and other cloud vendors are keeping close tabs on the estimated multi-billion-dollar U.S. DoD JEDI cloud contract, as it winds its way through the bidding process.

Pentagon delays disputed JEDI cloud contract

The JEDI will have to wait a while longer for the award of the Pentagon's hotly-contested multi-billion "winner-take-all" cloud contract because the RFP has just been delayed....

Microsoft employees protest: 'Stop work with ICE over cruel border policies'

Concern over harmful applications of AI once again sparks an employee protest -- this time at Microsoft.

Google employee protest: Now Google backs off Pentagon drone AI project

Google won't bid to renew its Project Maven contract with the Pentagon after it expires in 2019.

Google employee protest: Now 'Googlers are quitting' over Pentagon drone project

The number of employees against Google's Project Maven role grows, and they're now backed by a big group of academics.

Google to release DeepMind's StreetLearn for teaching machine-learning agents to navigate cities TechRepublic

The StreetLearn environment relies on images from Google Street View and has been used by Google DeepMind to train a software agent to navigate various western cities without reference to a map.

Google says it won't build AI for weapons

In a set of principles laid out to guide its development of artificial intelligence, Google also said it won't build AI for surveillance that violates "internationally accepted norms."

Facebook Portal device seeks to take video chat to the next level CNET

But will people trust the social network's new consumer device after all those data security problems?