Video: Face ID won't forget you - even if you get a new hairdo
As the chart below shows, you can spend as little as $349 for a base model iPhone SE, or spend as much as $1149 for a fully-equipped bleeding-edge iPhone X.
|iPhone 8 Plus||$799||$949|
|iPhone 7 Plus||$669||$769|
|iPhone 6s Plus||$549||$649|
Earlier this year, my wife donated her 6s Plus to me as an extra 4K camera, and bought an SE. She found the physical size of the Plus phone to be too large. That's one of the more interesting elements of the iPhone X -- it has more screen, in a smaller package.
The dollar decision
In this article, I'll be looking at what you might want to consider, if you're deciding between an iPhone 8, an 8 Plus, or an iPhone X. If your decision is mostly driven by budget, then you really want to spend your time with the price chart and decide what you can afford.
Since all three models (the 8, 8 Plus, and X) come in 64GB and 256GB configurations only, that simplifies the money calculation considerably. For each memory capacity, there's a hundred dollar jump between the iPhone 8 and the 8 Plus, and a two hundred dollar jump between the iPhone 8 Plus and the iPhone X.
So when it comes to a dollar decision, you're really deciding whether the iPhone X is worth $200 more to you than an iPhone 8 Plus, or $300 more to you than the iPhone 8.
Does size matter?
I mentioned size, and this is intriguing. The iPhone 8 has a 4.7-inch display with a 1334-by-750-pixel resolution at 326 ppi. The 8 Plus jumps that up to a 5.5-inch display with a 1920-by-1080-pixel resolution at 401 ppi.
But then there's the iPhone X. Its display is 5.8 inches with a 2436-by-1125-pixel resolution at 458 ppi. But wait. There's more. Or rather, less.
See, here's the thing. The iPhone 8 Plus' physical size is 3.07 by 6.24 inches. The iPhone X, with it's larger display, is physically considerably smaller. At 2.79 by 5.65 inches, it's closer in size to an iPhone 8 at 2.65 by 5.45 inches.
In other words, if you want the biggest possible display, but in a smaller phone, the iPhone X might be the phone for you.
More screen specs
There's a lot more going on in that iPhone X screen besides size. As mentioned above, it has considerably more pixels than previous models.
The iPhone X has an HDR screen, providing much higher contrast and color quality. Apple quantifies it as going from roughly a 1300:1 contrast ratio on the iPhone 8 Plus to a 1,000,000:1 contrast ratio on the iPhone X. Put simply, images will be crisper and more vivid.
The iPhone X also has a different method of lighting pixels: OLED (organic, light-emitting diodes). This is part of how you can get a more vivid screen. On most iPhones (and most non-OLED phones), the LCD display doesn't light up. Instead, there are side or back lights that provide the light.
In an OLED display, like in the iPhone X, each individual pixel produces its own light. Effectively, the iPhone X has 2,740,500 tiny little flashlights in its screen, each producing light.
OLED has many advantages over LCD, but as this CNET article shows, it's not a slam dunk. Nonetheless, you get OLED with the iPhone X. If a higher-quality, higher-resolution screen with greater color quality is important to you, the iPhone X might be worth those extra Benjamins.
Not your Dad's iPhone
We'll get to the camera in a minute, but let's cover some of the weird stuff first. The iPhone X is going to take some getting used to.
This is a big part of how Apple got more screen in a smaller space. By nuking the Home button, they get a ton of space back on the front of the phone.
But now, instead of having a tactile button you can find, even in the dark, you have to swipe up from the bottom of the screen to get to Home. And yes, that means that other swipe-up gestures have changed. If you buy an iPhone X, you'll have to live with that.
You'll also have to live without Touch ID. No longer will you be required to press the Home button to authenticate. Instead, you'll have to smile for the camera. Apple is introducing Face ID on the iPhone X.
Face ID adds a couple of new sensors to the front of the iPhone X, including a mechanism that projects 30,000 individual dots at your face, so the phone can measure who you are. I'm not sold on this technology, personally, but Apple claims that Face ID is actually considerably more accurate and secure than Touch ID.
There are some disadvantages. No matter what Apple says, Face ID will fail from time to time. In fact, it failed during Apple's public demo, although Apple claims it gracefully recovered as it was designed to. The problem there was that too many faces were scanned by one demo phone, and it simply got fed up and took its toys home.
My concern about Face ID is similar to the missing Home button: turning on the phone quickly in pitch black. I often get alerts in the middle of the night that I need to pay attention to. I can easily reach for my phone, feel the Home button, and authenticate, all in darkness. But without a Home button and a Face ID system that's essentially a camera, it's not clear to me just how well the recognition will work in darkness.
Also, faces change. My beard grows pretty fast, so I look different (more cave man) towards the end of my barber avoidance cycle than at the beginning. My wife puts on a different face to match each of her outfits. Makeup can significantly change someone's look. Apple does claim it can handle those changes, but, again, I have my doubts.
If you're deciding between an iPhone 8 or 8 Plus and an iPhone X, only you will know whether Face ID and the lack of a Home button excites you, or will annoy you to no end. For me, it's a turn off. But then again, I still have my iPhone 6s Plus, almost entirely because of how often I use the headphone jack.
AR has a lot of potential. For example, imagine you could point your camera at a wall, and it can tell you the dimensions of that wall. Apple and others in the AR space often show games being played through a screen, so that you might have a city on a table, or, in the case of Pokemon Go, little Poke monsters scattered throughout the world.
ARKit actually works on iPhones as old as the 6s. I ran a room measuring program (which failed for reasons other than interpreting reality) on my iPhone 6s Plus. On my phone, it actually did discern walls and floors, but because the phone wasn't itself rock steady just in my hand, the floor plan wobbled. That was a failing of the app developer, not ARKit.
In any case, where ARKit becomes interesting when buying a phone is the fact that it's designed to interpret physical reality, then do something with that interpretation. It can find a park bench, and put a little Pokemon guy on it. Or it could interpret a scene, and allow your camera software to manipulate it.
Think about that for a second. Once you have a camera and something smart enough to interpret a scene, you can combine the two to perform some interesting tricks. That, then, brings us to the cameras.
Each generation of iPhone has sported a substantially improved camera compared to the previous generation. The iPhone 7 camera has better performance and better image quality than the iPhone 6s, while the iPhone 7 Plus added a second lens to the back camera.
The iPhone 8 again improves image quality and, taking a hint from the AR capabilities I discussed earlier, adds a Portrait Lighting feature, allowing you to drop out backgrounds and dynamically create new lighting for your subjects without needing to use actual lighting fixtures.
This is where the ARKit capabilities become really interesting. Because as apps get better at working with a representation of reality, photo software can do a lot more. If you thought green screen effects were cool, wait until your phone actually understands what's in the image with you and makes changes based on that understanding.
CNET compared the iPhone 7 Plus and iPhone 8 Plus cameras side-by-side, and their definitive opinion is the iPhone 8 Plus beats the 7 Plus. That's no real surprise. But what about the iPhone X?
The big change is the front-facing camera on the iPhone X. Because it needs to be able to perform facial recognition, its capabilities have improved considerably. Apple added a depth mapping feature it calls True Depth. Basically, this allows the front-facing camera to have a much better understanding of what's in the image, and to make it look better.
Think of it as a selfie camera on steroids. True Depth gives you the ability to create smart selfies, with more flexibility and capability than you had with other iPhones.
The rear cameras on the iPhone X are roughly the same as that of the iPhone 8 Plus. The iPhone X telephoto lens has an ƒ/2.4 aperture instead of an ƒ/2.8 aperture, meaning it lets in a bit more light. But that's about it for the camera differences.
If you're a selfie fan, you might want to consider the iPhone X. If you're just taking pictures on the back camera, you're not going to get much more from the X.
So what does your $200-300 buy you?
The iPhone X uses the same A11 Bionic chip with 64-bit architecture, Neural engine, and Embedded M11 motion coprocessor as the iPhone 8 and 8 Plus. So your $200-300 is not getting you a faster processor.
It is getting you more screen size in less space than the 8 Plus. It is getting you more screen resolution, in that smaller space. It is getting you higher quality images as OLED technology.
It's also getting you a substantially improved front-facing camera that's a huge boon to selfie fans.
And, depending on whether you consider this a benefit or a shortcoming, you're getting Face ID and losing the Home button and Touch ID.
If you're still not sure, here are some recommendations based on the various benefits of the iPhone X.
- If you're desperate for as much screen as possible, but the Plus-sized phones are too much for you, get the iPhone X.
- If you want to see the highest contrast images at their best possible quality, get an iPhone X.
- If you are all about selfies and better selfies are worth a few hundred bucks to you, get an iPhone X.
- If you're mostly hoping to get good rear-facing camera quality, then the iPhone 8 Plus will be fine for you.
- If you're taking telephoto images and just can't get enough light, the iPhone X's slightly better aperture might (only might, because it's not that big a difference) give you an advantage.
- If you really like being able to find your Home button without lifting and looking at your phone, get an iPhone 8.
- If you have difficulty with fingerprint readers for authentication (there are people with very fine fingerprints that just don't read well), then consider an iPhone X.
- If you're just plain tired of the iPhone look we've had since the iPhone 6, then get an iPhone X. It's definitely a different-looking phone.
- If you've been waiting years for wireless iPhone charging (even though I've been doing it on my iPhone 6s Plus since 2015), you don't need an iPhone X. The iPhone 8 and 8 Plus both come with wireless charging.
So, there you have it. Are you going to spend the few extra hundred bucks for the X? Let me know in the comments below.
You can follow my day-to-day project updates on social media. Be sure to follow me on Twitter at @DavidGewirtz, on Facebook at Facebook.com/DavidGewirtz, on Instagram at Instagram.com/DavidGewirtz, and on YouTube at YouTube.com/DavidGewirtzTV.